4 research outputs found

    HE AMOT FAMILY OF PROTEINS BINDS AND ACTIVATES NEDD4 FAMILY LIGASES TO PROMOTE THE UBIQUITINATION OF LATS AND YAP

    Get PDF
    poster abstractAmot adaptor proteins bind and integrate signaling that controls cell po-larity and growth. All three Amot family members (Amot, AmotL1 and AmotL2) directly bind YAP; a transcriptional co-activator that controls the expression of genes involved in organ homeostasis and cell growth. Preven-tion of nuclear accumulation of YAP by either sequestration or degradation in the cytosol abolishes its transcriptional functions and is a major mechanism for growth arrest in response to cellular differentiation. This is mainly thought to be regulated by phosphorylation of YAP by the Hippo kinases LATS1/2. Recently, binding by the Amot proteins was also found to inhibit YAP by sequestering it in the cytosol through both LATS dependent and in-dependent mechanisms. This study identifies a novel mechanism whereby Amot proteins control YAP activation in a Hippo independent mechanism by coupling it to ubiquitination by Nedd4 family ligases. Amot proteins mediate the coupling of Nedd4 ligases with YAP by simultaneously binding both pro-teins via multiple PY motifs that are recognized by WW domains in both YAP and Nedd4. Binding of Nedd4 by Amot is also shown to relieve the auto-inhibition of its ligase activity. This may be a direct consequence of binding Amot or from being re-targeted in cells by Amot proteins to endosomes. Im-portantly, Amot induced ubiquitination of YAP by Nedd4 proteins is shown to enhance the residence of YAP in the nucleus and in YAP activated transcrip-tion. Taken together our data suggest that Amot couples Nedd4 family ubiq-uitin ligases with the transcriptional co-activator YAP to drive the ubiquitination and activation of YAP

    Advances in computational and translational approaches for malignant glioma

    Get PDF
    Gliomas are the most common primary brain tumors in adults and carry a dismal prognosis for patients. Current standard-of-care for gliomas is comprised of maximal safe surgical resection following by a combination of chemotherapy and radiation therapy depending on the grade and type of tumor. Despite decades of research efforts directed towards identifying effective therapies, curative treatments have been largely elusive in the majority of cases. The development and refinement of novel methodologies over recent years that integrate computational techniques with translational paradigms have begun to shed light on features of glioma, previously difficult to study. These methodologies have enabled a number of point-of-care approaches that can provide real-time, patient-specific and tumor-specific diagnostics that may guide the selection and development of therapies including decision-making surrounding surgical resection. Novel methodologies have also demonstrated utility in characterizing glioma-brain network dynamics and in turn early investigations into glioma plasticity and influence on surgical planning at a systems level. Similarly, application of such techniques in the laboratory setting have enhanced the ability to accurately model glioma disease processes and interrogate mechanisms of resistance to therapy. In this review, we highlight representative trends in the integration of computational methodologies including artificial intelligence and modeling with translational approaches in the study and treatment of malignant gliomas both at the point-of-care and outside the operative theater in silico as well as in the laboratory setting

    A Compact Blast-Induced Traumatic Brain Injury Model in Mice

    No full text
    Blast-induced traumatic brain injury (bTBI) is a common injury on the battlefield and often results in permanent cognitive and neurological abnormalities. We report a novel compact device that creates graded bTBI in mice. The injury severity can be controlled by precise pressures that mimic Friedlander shockwave curves. The mouse head was stabilized with a head fixator, and the body was protected with a metal shield; shockwave durations were 3 to 4 milliseconds. Reflective shockwave peak readings at the position of the mouse head were 12 6 2.6 psi, 50 6 20.3 psi, and 100 6 33.1 psi at 100, 200, and 250 psi predetermined driver chamber pressures, respectively. The bTBIs of 250 psi caused 80% mortality, which decreased to 27% with the metal shield. Brain and lung damage depended on the shockwave duration and amplitude. Cognitive deficits were assessed using the Morris water maze, Y-maze, and open-field tests. Pathological changes in the brain included disruption of the blood-brain barrier, multifocal neuronal and axonal degeneration, and reactive gliosis assessed by Evans Blue dye extravasation, silver and Fluoro-Jade B staining, and glial fibrillary acidic protein immunohistochemistry, respectively. Behavioral and pathological changes were injury severity-dependent. This mouse bTBI model may be useful for investigating injury mechanisms and therapeutic strategies associated with bTBI
    corecore