2 research outputs found

    Agent鈥怋ased Modeling of Alternative Futures in the British Land Use System

    No full text
    Socio鈥恊conomic scenarios such as the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs) have been widely used to analyze global change impacts, but representing their diversity is a challenge for the analytical tools applied to them. Taking Great Britain as an example, we represent a set of stakeholder鈥恊laborated UK鈥怱SP scenarios, linked to climate change scenarios (Representative Concentration Pathways), in a globally鈥恊mbedded agent鈥恇ased modeling framework. We find that distinct model components are required to account for divergent behavioral, social and societal conditions in the SSPs, and that these have dramatic impacts on land system outcomes. From strong social networks and environmental sustainability in SSP1 to land consolidation and technological intensification in SSP5, scenario鈥恠pecific model designs vary widely from one another and from present鈥恉ay conditions. Changes in social and human capitals reflecting social cohesion, equality, health and education can generate impacts larger than those of technological and economic change, and comparable to those of modeled climate change. We develop an open鈥恆ccess, transferrable model framework and provide UK鈥怱SP projections to 2080 at 1聽km2 resolution, revealing large differences in land management intensities, provision of a range of ecosystem services, and the knowledge and motivations underlying land manager decision鈥恗aking. These differences suggest the existence of large but underappreciated areas of scenario space, within which novel options for land system sustainability could occur.Key Points: A national鈥恠cale agent鈥恇ased model is developed to represent paired climatic and socio鈥恊conomic scenarios in the land system. Key scenario characteristics relate to forms of human behavior, interactions and societal preferences. Large differences emerge between scenarios in terms of land management intensities, ecosystem service provision and land sparing.Helmholtz Association http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100009318Natural Environment Research Council http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000270Climate Resilience ProgrammeForestry Commission UK Forestry Commission http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100017497UKRI, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000266Global Food Security ProgrammeDAAD, German Academic Exchange Service London http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001654Government of the United Kingdom http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100013986Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001655Bundesministerium f眉r Bildung und Forschung http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100002347Karlsruhe Institute of Technology http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100009133Leibniz鈥怗emeinschaft http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001664https://landchange.earth/CRAFTYhttps://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/CY8W
    corecore