Targeting PI3K/AKT/mTOR Pathway in Breast Cancer: From Biology to Clinical Challenges

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common women cancer and cause of cancer death. Despite decades of scientific progress in BC treatments, the clinical benefit of new drugs is modest in several cases. The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (AKT)/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway mutations are frequent in BC (20-40%) and are significant causes of aggressive tumor behavior, as well as treatment resistance. Improving knowledge of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway is an urgent need. This review aims to highlight the central role of PI3K-mTORC1/C2 mutations in the different BC subtypes, in terms of clinical outcomes and treatment efficacy. The broad base of knowledge in tumor biology is a key point for personalized BC therapy in the precision medicine era

T-DM1 efficacy in trastuzumab-pertuzumab pre-treated HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer patients: a meta-analysis.

Background: Current guidelines consider T-DM1 the standard 2nd line therapy for HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients following trastuzumab (T) + pertuzumab (P) and taxane 1st line treatment. Despite this, there are no prospective studies supporting this sequence. Methods: We performed a meta-analysis using real world data to determine the efficacy of T-DM1 after 1st line TP in HER2 positive MBC patients. We used a random-effect model to find differences in the rate of 1-year progression free survival (PFS) between TP pre-treated population and the EMILIA phase III pivotal trial. Results: Seven studies were eligible. The meta-analysis showed a combined 1-year PFS risk difference for T-DM1 efficacy after TP in 2nd or more lines of -0.122, with lower and upper limits of -0.253 and 0.010, respectively (p = 0.07), with low heterogeneity among studies (I2 0.01%, p = 0.836). Considering the four studies on T-DM1 in 2nd line setting, 1-year PFS risk was -0.034 (95% CI -0.207 - 0,139; p = 0.701) (I2 0.01%, p = 0.91). Conclusion: Overall, the efficacy of T-DM1 after TP seems to be similar to that previously reported in the EMILIA trial. In the second line setting, data are not mature enough to confirm T-DM1 efficacy in TP pre-treated population

The treatment paradigm of right-sided metastatic colon cancer: harboring BRAF mutation makes the difference

Purpose: BRAF mutations represent the main negative prognostic factor for metastatic colorectal cancer and a supposed negative predictive factor of response to standard chemotherapy. We have explored survival difference in right-sided colon cancer (RCC) patients according to BRAF mutations, with the aim to identify any predictive factors of response to targeted-based therapy. Methods: A retrospective study of RCC patients, with BRAF known mutation status, treated with chemotherapy (CT) from October 2008 to June 2019 in 5 Italian centers, was conducted. Results: We identified 207 advanced RCC patients: 20.3% BRAF mutant and 79.7% BRAF wild type (wt). BRAF-mutant cancers were more likely to be pT4 (50.0% v 25.7%, p = 0.016), undifferentiated (71.4% v 44.0%, p = 0.004), KRAS wt (90.5% v 38.2%, p < 0.001), and MSI-H (41.7% v 16.2%, p = 0.019) tumors, with synchronous (52.4% v 31.5%, p = 0.018) and peritoneal metastases (38.1% v 22.4%, p = 0.003). Median overall survival (OS) was 16 v 27 months in BRAF mutant and BRAF wt (P = 0.020). In first-line setting, BRAF-mutant showed a 2ys OS of 80% in clinical trials, 32% in anti-VEGF, 14% in epidermial growth factor receptor (EGFR), and 0% in chemotherapy alone regimens (P = 0.009). BRAF-mutant patients demonstrated worse survival, regardless of targeted therapy administered. However, survival difference was statistically significant in the anti-EGFR-treated subgroup (16 v 28 months, P = 0.005 in BRAF mutant v BRAF wt, respectively). Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that BRAF status makes the difference in treatment’s outcome. Therefore, the anti-EGFR should not be excluded in all advanced RCC but considered on a case-by-case basis

The role of PNI to predict survival in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with Sorafenib

Background and aims The present study aims to investigate the role of the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) on survival in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with sorafenib. Methods This multicentric study included a training cohort of 194 HCC patients and three external validation cohorts of 129, 76 and 265 HCC patients treated with Sorafenib, respectively. The PNI was calculated as follows: 10 × serum albumin (g/dL) + 0.005 × total lymphocyte count (per mm3). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to investigate the association between the covariates and the overall survival (OS). Results A PNI cut-off value of 31.3 was established using the ROC analysis. In the training cohort, the median OS was 14.8 months (95% CI 12–76.3) and 6.8 months (95% CI 2.7–24.6) for patients with a high (>31.3) and low (<31.3) PNI, respectively. At both the univariate and the multivariate analysis, low PNI value (p = 0.0004), a 1-unit increase of aspartate aminotransferase (p = 0.0001), and age > 70 years (p< 0.0038) were independent prognostic factors for OS. By performing the same multivariate analysis of the training cohort, the PNI <31.3 versus >31.3 was found to be an independent prognostic factor for predicting OS in all the three validation cohorts. Conclusions PNI represents a prognostic tool in advanced HCC treated with first-line Sorafenib. It is readily available and low-cost, and it could be implemented in clinical practice in patients with HCC

Pazopanib-related secondary polycythemia in metastatic myxofibrosarcoma: A case report and review of the literature

Introduction: Pazopanib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), is a standard treatment for various tumours, including metastatic non-adipocytic soft-tissue sarcomas. In literature, erythrocytosis has been described as a TKI-related condition. Case report: A 59-year-old man underwent surgical removal of a sub-scapular mass consistent with myxofibrosarcoma. After distant relapse, he first started chemotherapy, and then Pazopanib. He was found to have increased levels of hemoglobin (Hb) and hematocrit (Hct). He was asymphtomatic, with no history of pulmonary disease nor smoking habit. Erythropoietin (EPO) level was higher than normal. A polycythemia vera was ruled out. Management & outcome: The patient started a prophylactic therapy with lysine acetylsalicylate, and we observed a reduction of Hb, but not Hct. Due to disease progression, we interrupted Pazopanib. After a week from drug discontinuation, Hb levels got back to the normal range, Hct was lowering. We decided not to perform phlebotomy, considering the declining trend in Hb and Hct values and the absence of symptoms. Discussion: We postulated a Pazopanib-related secondary erythrocytosis, since Hb and Hct levels increased from baseline during treatment, then normalized when Pazopanib was discontinued. We used the Naranjo Nomogram to assess the correlation between the adverse effect and Pazopanib, the correlation was “Probable”, a score of 5. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report of Pazopanib-related secondary polycythemia in a patient with sarcoma. It is important to pay attention to blood count and to any symptoms potentially related to erythrocytosis in patients treated with TKIs

Ocular Toxicity in Breast Cancer Management: Manual for The Oncologist

Ocular adverse events are common to many antineoplastic agents, although often misunderstood. In most cases, they are easily manageable, but sometimes they require instrumental diagnostics and specific treatments. There are currently no international guidelines for the management of these toxicities. In this review we summarized the main ocular adverse events related to the antineoplastic agents used in the treatment of breast cancer, analyzing their clinical presentation and management, trying to provide a useful tool to be used in clinical practice

BRAF-mutated colorectal cancer: Clinical and molecular insights

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the leading causes of mortality and morbidity in the world. It is a heterogeneous disease, which can be classified into different subtypes, characterized by specific molecular and morphological alterations. In this context, BRAF mutations are found in about 10% of CRC patients and define a particular subtype, characterized by a dismal prognosis, with a median survival of less than 12 months. Chemotherapy plus bevacizumab is the current standard therapy in first-line treatment of BRAF-mutated metastatic CRC (mCRC), with triplet (FOLFOXIRI) plus bevacizumab as a valid option in patients with a good performance status. BRAF inhibitors are not so effective as compared to melanoma, because of various resistance mechanisms. However, the recently published results of the BEACON trial will establish a new standard of care in this setting. This review provides insights into the molecular underpinnings underlying the resistance to standard treatment of BRAF-mutated CRCs, with a focus on their molecular heterogeneity and on the research perspectives both from a translational and a clinical point of view

Immunotherapy in Dialysis-Dependent Cancer Patients: Our Experience in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma and a Review of the Literature

In the past few years, several new drugs such as targeted therapy and immunotherapy have shown activity for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Literature data are very limited in some subgroups of patients such as those with end-stage renal disease who require hemodialysis and were excluded from pivotal clinical trials. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 8 hemodialysis-dependent patients with mRCC who were treated with nivolumab to evaluate the treatment-related toxicities and the clinical outcomes. Among these 8 patients, the objective response rate was 12.5%, and the disease control rate was 75%. The estimated median progression-free survival was 16 months and median overall survival was 26 months. There were no Grade 4 adverse events and only 2 patients had Grade 3 adverse events. Despite that the retrospective nature of this survey and the relatively small sample size represent major limitations, these data indicate that treatment with nivolumab is feasible with no unexpected toxicity and good efficacy in this cohort of patients

Irinotecan-based chemotherapy in extrapulmonary neuroendocrine carcinomas: survival and safety data from a multicentric Italian experience

Purpose: Neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) are a rare subgroup of neuroendocrine neoplasms that occasionally originate from gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP) tract. Evidence of the effectiveness of chemotherapy is scarce. Platinum plus Etoposide regimens are currently the standard treatment in first-line, while little data are available on second-line treatments. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of irinotecan (IRI)-based chemotherapy in a series of extrapulmonary NECs. Methods: Patients with NEC diagnosis treated at University Hospitals of Modena, Florence, Pisa, and European Institute of Oncology of Milan with an IRI-based regimen (FOLFIRI or XELIRI) after progression to a first-line platinum-based therapy were enrolled. Objective responses were assessed according to RECIST criteria. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated. Results: Thirty-four patients, 16 males, and 18 females, median age of 59 years (range 32–77), with metastatic NEC were included. Twenty-seven patients had Ki-67 ≥ 55% and four patients Ki-67 of <55% (for three patients data were not available). The median number of treatment cycles of the IRI-based regimen was 7.5 (range 1–16). Six partial responses (17.6%) and 9 stable diseases (26.5%) were observed, with a disease control rate of 44.1%. Median PFS and OS were 4.4 and 5.9 months, respectively. Neutropenia, anemia, and nausea were the only G3–G4 toxicities reported. Conclusions: Despite the relatively small sample size, IRI-based therapy demonstrated to be a valid option for patients with pretreated extrapulmonary NEC