Incisional hernia repair after caesarean section: a population based study

BACKGROUND Incisional hernias occur at surgical abdominal incision sites but the association with caesarean section (CS) has not been examined. AIM: To determine whether CS is a risk factor for incisional hernia repair. MATERIAL and METHODS: Population-based cohort study in Australia using linked birth and hospital data for women who gave birth from 2000 to 2011. (n=642,578) Survival analysis was used to explore the association between CS and subsequent incisional hernia repair. Analyses were adjusted for confounding factors including other abdominal surgery. The main outcome measure was surgical repair of an incisional hernia. RESULTS: 217,555 women (33.9%) had at least one CS and 1,554 (0.2%) had an incisional hernia repair. The frequency of incisional hernia repair in women who had ever had a caesarean section was 0.47%, compared to 0.12% in women who never had a caesarean section. After controlling for different follow up lengths and known explanatory variables, the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) was 2.73 (95%CI 2.45-3.06, P <0.001). Incisional hernia repair risk increased with number of caesarean sections: women with two CS had a threefold increased risk of incisional hernia repair, which increased to 6 fold after five CS (aHR=6.29, 95%CI 3.99-9.93, P<0.001) compared to women with no CS. Prior abdominal surgery including other hernia repair also increased the risk of incisional hernia repair (all p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There was a strong association between maternal CS and subsequent incisional hernia repair, which increased as the number of CSs increased, but the absolute risk of incisional hernia repair was low.We thank the New South Wales (NSW) Ministry of Health for access to the population health data and the NSW Centre for Health Record Linkage for linking the data sets. This work was supported by an Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Centre for Research Excellence Grant (1001066). CLR is supported by a NHMRC Senior Research Fellowship (#APP1021025)

Women’s expectations and experiences of maternity care in NSW - what women highlight as most important

Background Although surveys have identified that women are generally highly satisfied with maternity care provision, those aspects of care that women highlight as most important for achieving satisfaction and a satisfactory maternity care experience have not been reported. The aim of this study was to investigate how women understand and experience their maternity care and to report which aspects of care women highlight as most important. Methods This large qualitative study explored women’s expectations and experiences of maternity care provision. In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with 53 women experiencing maternity care in a range of tertiary, regional, rural, remote hospitals and midwife-led practices in the state of New South Wales, Australia during 2011 to 2012. Included in the interview schedule was the question ‘What 3 aspects would you see as most important for delivery of maternity care?’ Descriptive analyses of entire transcripts and responses to the question on most important aspects of care were undertaken. Results Descriptive analyses of women’s responses identified 5 important aspects of care: woman-focused care, staff qualities, systems and facilities, family-focused care and continuity of care/information. First-time mothers were more likely to identify woman-focused care, staff qualities and continuity of care/information as important 3 aspects than multiparous mothers. Urban and regional mothers highlighted staff qualities as having greater importance for satisfaction with their care while rural and particularly remote women nominated systems and facilities as important. Conclusions Our study showed that women from a range of settings are more concerned with staff and relational issues than facilities. Differences in perceptions among primiparous versus multiparous women, at different stages of pregnancy and among women from rural and remote compared to urban settings highlight the need to include women with a diversity of experience when trying to understand the aspects of maternity care most important to women

Influence of patterns of neonatal transfers on breastfeeding outcomes

Aim: To investigate/evaluate the impact of hospital transfers on breastfeeding outcomes for infants requiring neonatal intensive care and to explore approaches to supporting lactation and breastfeeding. Methods: A national study of two cohorts of infants admitted to the nine neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in New South Wales (NSW) Australia using data sourced from a prospectively collected NICUS data collection. Results: A total of 7829 infants were admitted to the nine NICUs in NSW for two 18-month cohorts (2012/2013 and 2015/2016) and were included in the study. These infants experienced 17 238 transfers to 107 different hospitals during the study period. Multiple transfers and low gestational age were independently associated with lower breastfeeding rates at hospital discharge across both cohorts. Extremely preterm infants and those with the greatest number of hospital transfers are least likely to be breastfed at time of discharge. Breastfeeding rates remained unchanged over time. The level of lactation support varied across NICUs. Conclusion: This study highlights the challenges of establishing and maintaining breastfeeding for infants requiring intensive care who have had multiple hospital transfers for continuing or specialist care. There is wide variation in lactation support across facilities. The importance of a consistent approach, education programmes and the provision of appropriate lactation support is emphasised