Severe rhabdomyolysis associated with pemetrexed-based chemotherapy

Pemetrexed is an antifolate metabolite that inhibits several enzymes involved in the folate pathway. It has activity against various solid tumours, and has been approved for treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma on the basis of findings from a randomised phase III trial.1 The main toxic effects noted for pemetrexed have been rash, myelosuppression, diarrhoea, mucositis, and reversible elevation of liver enzymes—effects that are preventable partly by vitamin supplementation.

Mesotelioma pleurico

Inquadramento diagnostico e terapeutico del mesotelioma pleurico

Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Cisplatin must be considered the treatment standard for lung cancer chemotherapy, whatever the disease setting, at least in the Western world. After the seminal meta-analysis published in 1995, 12 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) exploring the benefits of adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy have been completed, published, or presented. Although all these RCTs differ in patient features, two common suggestions emerge when the stage is taken into account: a significant benefit for chemotherapy is demonstrated for stage II and IIIA patients and none of these trials showed any significant benefit for adjuvant chemotherapy in stage IB patients. Ten years after this meta-analysis, a further individual patient data-pooled analysis exploring the eventual benefits of adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy after surgery for early stage non-small cell lung cancer in the more recent RCTs has been presented. The 5-year overall survival benefit in favor of cisplatin-based chemotherapy was 5.3% (48.8% versus 43.3%, p = 0.004), with a relative risk reduction of 11%. These results confirm those reported by previous meta-analyses performed according to a literature-based approach. Advances are emerging in the selection of those patients who are likely to benefit more from such treatment. In this respect, the customized therapy based on molecular/genetic patient and disease features constitutes a new avenue to pursue

Nuclear and cytoplasmic cellular distribution of survivin as survival predictor in resected non-small-cell lung cancer.

AIM: Survivin is a member of the inhibitors of apoptosis (IAP) gene family that acts through pathways different from those involving the bcl-2 family. Largely undetectable in normal adult tissues, survivin is deregulated in most human cancers including non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and may represent a tumor marker with prognostic and therapeutic implications. Aim of our study was to determine the prognostic role of survivin as an apoptosis-related biomarker in a series of resected NSCLC patients. METHODS: A retrospective series of resected NSCLC patients were retrieved from the files of the Regina Elena National Cancer Institute. Survivin was detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC) using a polyclonal antibody. Survivin displayed two kinds of immunoreactivity: (i) a diffuse cytoplasmic staining and (ii) a distinct nuclear staining. A score-scale to distinguish positive (score 1-2) vs. negative (score 0) pattern was applied. Clinical and biological (nuclear and cytoplasmic survivin staining) covariables were screened for a prognostic relationship with overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) into the univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Data referring to 116 NSCLC patients who underwent surgery for stage I-IIIA NSCLC were collected. Multivariate analyses identified tumor size, nodal status and nuclear, but not cytoplasmic, expression of survivin as significant independent predictors of OS, with a hazard ratio of 2.40 (95% CI 1.44, 3.99, p=0.001), 2.03 (95% CI 1.26, 3.26, p=0.003) and 1.83 (95% CI 1.01, 3.30, p=0.044), respectively. Median OS for nuclear survivin positive (score 1-2) and negative (score 0) patients were 23 months (95% CI 15, 31) and 36 months (95% CI 1, 76), respectively (p=0.01); five-year survival for score 1-2 and score 0 patients were 20% and 44.5%, respectively. Conversely, no significant impact on survival is found when patients are stratified according to cytoplasmic survivin expression. CONCLUSIONS: Data presented herein open the issue that prognosis of stage I-IIIA NSCLC can be linked to the cellular pattern of distribution of survivin

Is recurrent venous thromboembolism after therapy reduced by low-molecular-weight heparin compared with oral anticoagulants?

PURPOSES: To evaluate whether the incidence of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) events after therapy differs for patients treated with long-term low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) or oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT). METHODS: All randomized studies were searched through computerized queries of MEDLINE, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, the American Society of Hematology abstract database, and the American Society of Clinical Oncology abstract database. RESULTS: Eleven studies including 2,907 patients were identified. Seven studies evaluated a period of 3 to 9 months after cessation of the allocated treatment: 5.4% of patients in the LMWH group vs 4% in the arm allocated to OAT had an episode of recurrent symptomatic VTE. Combined analysis showed a nonsignificant trend in lowering recurrent symptomatic VTE in favor of OAT (relative risk [RR], 1.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82 to 2.02; p = 0.27). By contrast, during active treatment, a statistically significant reduction of the risk of recurrent symptomatic VTE in favor of LMWH over OAT was registered (RR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.83; p = 0.001). Regarding cancer patients only, 37 of 569 patients (6.5%) in the LMWH group had recurrent symptomatic VTE vs 69 of 546 patients (12.6%) in the OAT group, with a statistically significant reduction of the risk of recurrent symptomatic VTE in favor of LMWH (RR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.76; p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the significant reduction of the risk of recurrent symptomatic VTE in favor of LMWH over OAT during treatment, patients treated with long-term LMWH do not seem to have more frequently recurrent VTE events compared with OAT after cessation of therapy. The significant difference favoring LMWH over OAT among all patients receiving treatment comes mostly from studies enrolling cancer patients

Second- and third-generation aromatase inhibitors as first-line endocrine therapy in postmenopausal metastatic breast cancer patients: a pooled analysis of the randomised trials

The purpose of this study was to estimate in all randomised trials the relative risk of overall response rate (ORR), clinical benefit (CB), time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and toxicity of aromatase inhibitors (AI), compared with tamoxifen (Tam) as first-line endocrine therapy in postmenopausal metastatic breast cancer (PMBC) women. Prospective randomised studies were searched through computerised queries of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) abstract database. Relative risk, 95% confidence interval, and heterogeneity were derived according to the inverse variance and Mantel-Haenszel method and Q statistics. Six phase III prospective randomised trials including 2787 women were gathered. A significant advantage in ORR (P = 0.042), TTP (P = 0.007), and CB (P = 0.001) in favour of AI over Tam was detected at the fixed effects model. These results were not significant at the random effects model, owing to the significant heterogeneity. On the contrary, no difference was registered for OS (P = 0.743) with no significant heterogeneity. Regarding toxicity, Tam caused more frequently thromboembolic events (P = 0.005) and vaginal bleeding (P = 0.001) compared with AI. Aromatase inhibitors appear to be superior to Tam as first-line endocrine option in PMBC women. Owing to a component of variability between the six studies analysed, the random effects estimates differed from corresponding fixed ones. Investigators should assess heterogeneity of trial results before deriving summary estimates of treatment effect

Aromatase inhibitors in post-menopausal metastatic breast carcinoma

To summarise the advances in the hormonal treatment of post-menopausal metastatic breast cancer, this paper reviews the published literature regarding the randomised trials comparing aromatase inhibitors (AIs) versus tamoxifen as a first-line therapeutic choice, or AIs versus megestrole acetate (MEG) as a second-line option. The pooled analysis of these authors on AI versus MEG as a second-line option for post-menopausal metastatic breast cancer suggested that AIs do not add any significant benefit over MEG in terms of overall response rate (ORR) and time to progression. According to the Cochrane Database, use of an AI as a second-line therapy versus any other endocrine therapy (mostly MEG) has shown a significant benefit in terms of overall survival, but not for progression-free survival, clinical benefit (CB) or ORR. Concerning the authors' comparisons between AIs versus tamoxifen as a first-line endocrine option in post-menopausal women with metastatic breast carcinoma, AIs seem to be superior to tamoxifen, with a significant benefit in terms of ORR, CB and time to progression being observed in favour of AIs over tamoxifen with fixed effects estimates. According to the Cochrane Database, there was an advantage to the use of AIs over tamoxifen in terms of progression-free survival and CB, but not for overall survival or ORR. With regards to toxicity, AIs show similar levels of hot flushes and arthralgia, increased risks of nausea, diarrhoea and vomiting, but a decreased risk of vaginal bleeding and thromboembolic events compared with other endocrine therapies. Weight gain, dyspnoea and peripheral oedema seem to be more frequent with MEG. At present, there is no proved overall survival difference in patients who are treated first with an AI and then with tamoxifen compared with the opposite sequence. In the metastatic setting, results are limited and are based on retrospective analyses

Novel Clinical Prognostic Score Incorporating the Number of Resected Lymph-Nodes to Predict Recurrence and Survival in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The number of resected lymph-nodes (#RNs) has proven prognostic in breast and colorectal cancer. Here we evaluated its prognostic impact in a series of resected NSCLC patients. METHODS: A panel of established prognostic factors plus (1) #RNs or (2) the ratio between the number of metastatic nodes and #RNs (NR) were correlated to overall- (OS), cancer-specific- (CSS), and disease-free-survival (DFS), using the Cox-model. Risk-classes according to hazard ratios (HR) were generated. Internal and external validation was accomplished. RESULTS: A dataset of 415 resected NSCLC patients was retrieved. At multivariate analysis, #RNs and NR were independent factor for longer OS, CSS and DFS (p10 (identified optimal cut-off) had a statistically significant OS (p=0.02) and DFS (p=0.0005) benefit. In node-positive patients, a NR<9% significantly correlated with better outcome. Stratification into High-, Medium-, and Low-Risk classes, based on High- (HRFs: stage, N-status, age, #RNs) and Intermediate-Risk Factors (IRFs: sex, grading, histology), efficiently predicted outcomes (p<0.0001). The risk class model performance was externally validated in and independent dataset of 297 patients. CONCLUSIONS: These results contribute to complete the panel of prognostic factors for resected NSCLC. A prospective larger validation and comparison with molecular prognostic tools is warranted