3,712 research outputs found
Classical causal models for Bell and Kochen-Specker inequality violations require fine-tuning
Nonlocality and contextuality are at the root of conceptual puzzles in
quantum mechanics, and are key resources for quantum advantage in
information-processing tasks. Bell nonlocality is best understood as the
incompatibility between quantum correlations and the classical theory of
causality, applied to relativistic causal structure. Contextuality, on the
other hand, is on a more controversial foundation. In this work, I provide a
common conceptual ground between nonlocality and contextuality as violations of
classical causality. First, I show that Bell inequalities can be derived solely
from the assumptions of no-signalling and no-fine-tuning of the causal model.
This removes two extra assumptions from a recent result from Wood and Spekkens,
and remarkably, does not require any assumption related to independence of
measurement settings -- unlike all other derivations of Bell inequalities. I
then introduce a formalism to represent contextuality scenarios within causal
models and show that all classical causal models for violations of a
Kochen-Specker inequality require fine-tuning. Thus the quantum violation of
classical causality goes beyond the case of space-like separated systems, and
manifests already in scenarios involving single systems.Comment: 9 pages, 14 figures. Modified title, discussion and presentatio
Weak values in a classical theory with an epistemic restriction
Weak measurement of a quantum system followed by postselection based on a
subsequent strong measurement gives rise to a quantity called the weak value: a
complex number for which the interpretation has long been debated. We analyse
the procedure of weak measurement and postselection, and the interpretation of
the associated weak value, using a theory of classical mechanics supplemented
by an epistemic restriction that is known to be operationally equivalent to a
subtheory of quantum mechanics. Both the real and imaginary components of the
weak value appear as phase space displacements in the postselected expectation
values of the measurement device's position and momentum distributions, and we
recover the same displacements as in the quantum case by studying the
corresponding evolution in the classical theory. By using this analogous
classical theory, we gain insight into the appearance of the weak value as a
result of the statistical effects of post selection, and this provides us with
an operational interpretation of the weak value, both its real and imaginary
parts. We find that the imaginary part of the weak value is a measure of how
much postselection biases the mean phase space distribution for a given amount
of measurement disturbance. All such biases proportional to the imaginary part
of the weak value vanish in the limit where disturbance due to measurement goes
to zero. Our analysis also offers intuitive insight into how measurement
disturbance can be minimised and the limits of weak measurement.Comment: 9 pages, 2 figures, comments welcome; v2 added some references; v3
published versio
Causation, decision theory, and Bell's theorem: a quantum analogue of the Newcomb problem
I apply some of the lessons from quantum theory, in particular from Bell's
theorem, to a debate on the foundations of decision theory and causation. By
tracing a formal analogy between the basic assumptions of Causal Decision
Theory (CDT)--which was developed partly in response to Newcomb's problem-- and
those of a Local Hidden Variable (LHV) theory in the context of quantum
mechanics, I show that an agent who acts according to CDT and gives any nonzero
credence to some possible causal interpretations underlying quantum phenomena
should bet against quantum mechanics in some feasible game scenarios involving
entangled systems, no matter what evidence they acquire. As a consequence,
either the most accepted version of decision theory is wrong, or it provides a
practical distinction, in terms of the prescribed behaviour of rational agents,
between some metaphysical hypotheses regarding the causal structure underlying
quantum mechanics.Comment: Cross-posted in http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00004872
- âŠ