Oligomeric structure of the repressor of the bacteriophage Mu early operon

International audienceThe regulation of the lytic and lysogenic development in the life cycle of bacteriophage Mu is regulated in part by its repressor, c, which binds to three operator sites, O1, O2 and O3, overlapping two divergent promoters. The oligomeric structure of this repressor protein was investigated by hydrodynamic and biochemical methods. Size-exclusion chromatography, analytical ultracentrifugation, dynamic light scattering, crosslinking and direct electron microscopy observations suggest that c exists primarily as a hexamer with a molecular mass of 120Ϫ140 kDa at low concentrations, i.e. in the 10-µM range. This molecule undergoes a self-assembly process leading to dodecamers and higher order species as the concentration is further increased in a manner depending on the nature of the solvent. Our results also suggest that these species have an elongated structure, and a possible arrangement of the subunits within the hexamer is proposed. The implication of this unusual quaternary structure for a repressor in its interaction with the operator sites O1 and O2 remains to be elucidated

Top-down mass spectrometry of intact membrane protein complexes reveals oligomeric state and sequence information in a single experiment

Here we study the intact stoichiometry and top-down fragmentation behavior of three integral membrane proteins which were natively reconstituted into detergent micelles: the mechano-sensitive ion channel of large conductance (MscL), the Kirbac potassium channel and the p7 viroporin from the hepatitis C virus. By releasing the proteins under nondenaturing conditions inside the mass spectrometer, we obtained their oligomeric sizes. Increasing the ion activation (collision energy) causes unfolding and subsequent ejection of a highly charged monomer from the membrane protein complexes. Further increase of the ion activation then causes collision-induced dissociation (CID) of the ejected monomers, with fragments observed which were predominantly found to stem from membrane-embedded regions. These experiments show how in a single experiment, we can probe the relation between higher-order structure and protein sequence, by combining the native MS data with fragmentation obtained from top-down MS

Mouse TSPO in a lipid environment interacting with a functionalized monolayer.

International audienceTranslocator protein TSPO is a membrane protein highly conserved in evolution which does not belong to any structural known family. TSPO is involved in physiological functions among which transport of molecules such as cholesterol to form steroids and bile salts in mammalian cells. Membrane protein structure determination remains a difficult task and needs concomitant approaches (for instance X-ray- or Electron-crystallography and NMR). Electron microscopy and two-dimensional crystallization under functionalized monolayers have been successfully developed for recombinant tagged proteins. The difficulty comes from the detergent carried by membrane proteins that disrupt the lipid monolayer. We identified the best conditions for injecting the histidine tagged recombinant TSPO in detergent in the subphase and to keep the protein stable. Reconstituted recombinant protein into a lipid bilayer favors its adsorption to functionalized monolayers and limits the disruption of the monolayer by reducing the amount of detergent. Finally, we obtained the first transmission electron microscopy images of recombinant mouse TSPO negatively stained bound to the lipid monolayer after injection into the subphase of pre-reconstituted TSPO in lipids. Image analysis reveals that circular objects could correspond to an association of at least four monomers of mouse TSPO. The different amino acid compositions and the location of the polyhistidine tag between bacterial and mouse TSPO could account for the formation of dimer versus tetramer, respectively. The difference in the loop between the first and second putative transmembrane domain may contribute to distinct monomer interaction, this is supported by differences in ligand binding parameters and biological functions of both proteins