Solitude and fear during the great coronavirus war

When you get ill, the first thing that comes to your mind is, “Will I make it? Will I survive? . COVID19 has a major impact on mental health. A sadness that inundates us like a river in flood and which we cannot hold back. But the thing that torments is the solitude. Those who struggle towards recovery do it alone, and those who do not make it die alone. An emblematic experience of a sense of loneliness, depression and death during illness is deeply described. We tell how the love of family and friends can help to recover from the abyss. Fighting this battle and winning it alone is painful. A lonely death is even more painful. We must stick together virtually and think about each other. The work done with enormous strength and tenacity by doctors and nurses is a great hope for a better time. It does raise the hope that a future generation will be able to truly take care of mankind. When all this ends, we must not go back to normal. We must be reborn, better. Experience Framework This article is associated with the Patient, Family & Community Engagement lens of The Beryl Institute Experience Framework. (http://bit.ly/ExperienceFramework) Access other PXJ articles related to this lens. Access other resources related to this lens

Hospitalizations for tuberculosis in Sicily over the years 2009–2021: Clinical features, comorbidities, and predictors of mortality

Background: Very few data are available in the literature regarding tuberculosis (TB) hospitalization, and few studies have reported the clinical characteristics and comorbidities of admitted patients and burden and cost of hospitalization. In our study, we described the occurrence of TB hospital admissions in the southern Italian region of Sicily over 13 years (2009–2021), explored the characteristics of patients with TB, and determined the comorbidities associated with mortality. Method: Data on the hospital discharge of all patients with TB hospitalized in all Sicilian hospitals were retrospectively collected from hospital standard discharge forms. Age, sex, nationality, length of hospital stay, comorbidities, and TB localization were evaluated using univariate analysis according to in-hospital mortality. The factors associated with mortality were included in the logistic regression model. Results: In Sicily, 3745 people were hospitalized for TB, with 5239 admissions and 166 deaths from 2009 to 2021. Most hospitalizations involved Italian-born people (46.3%), followed by African-born people (32.8%) and Eastern European-born people (14.1%). The average hospitalization cost was EUR 5259 ± 2592, with a median length of stay of 16 days (interquartile range, 8–30) days. Multivariate analysis showed that the development of acute kidney failure (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]=7.2, p < 0.001), alcohol consumption (aOR=8.9, p = 0.001), malignant tumors (aOR=2.1, p = 0.022), human immunodeficiency virus infection (aOR=3.4, p < 0.001), sepsis (aOR=15.2, p < 0.001), central nervous system involvement (aOR=9.9, p < 0.001), and miliary TB (aOR=2.5, p = 0.004) were independent predictors of mortality. Conclusion: TB in Sicily remains an important cause of hospitalization. HIV infection and comorbidities may complicate patient management and worsen patient outcomes

CTLA-4 and PD-1 ligand gene expression in epithelial thyroid cancers

The dysregulation of PD-1 ligands (PD-L1 and PD-L2) and CTLA-4 ligands (CD80 and CD86) represents a tumor strategy to escape the immune surveillance. Here, the expression of PD-L1, PD-L2, CD80 and CD86 was evaluated at mRNA level in 94 patients affected by papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) and 11 patients affected by anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC). Variations in the mRNAs in PTC patients were then correlated with clinicopathological features. The expression of all genes was deregulated in PTC and ATC tissues compared to normal tissues. In particular, the down-regulation of CD80 was observed in above all ATC. In addition, the increased expression of CD80 associated to longer disease-free survival in PTC. Higher expression of PD-L1 associated with the classical histological variant and with the presence of BRAFV600E mutation in PTC. The increased PD-L2 expression correlated with BRAFV600E mutation and lymph node metastasis, while its lower expression correlated with the follicular PTC variant. The latter was also associated with the CD80 down-regulation, which was also related to the absence of lymph node metastasis. In conclusion, we documented the overall dysregulation of PD-1 and CTLA-4 ligands in PTC and ATC tissues and a possible prognostic value for CD80 gene expression in PTC

EGFR-TKI plus anti-angiogenic drugs in EGFR-mutated NSCLC: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Abstract Background Results of several RCTs testing the combination of an EGFR-TKI plus an anti-angiogenic drug in advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC were reported. Methods We first report a systematic-review and meta-analysis of all RCTs, to estimate effectiveness and toxicity of such new therapeutic approach as compared with first-generation EGFR-TKIs monotherapy. Subsequently, we present a network meta-analysis (NMA) comparing the combination of an EGFR-TKI plus an anti-angiogenic drug with other two new treatment-options: combination of an EGFR-TKI plus chemotherapy or new EGFR-TKIs of second or third generation as monotherapy. Results Five RCTs were included in the first meta-analysis. The PFS was statistically significantly larger in patients treated with an EGFR-TKI plus an anti-angiogenic drug as compared with EGFR-TKI monotherapy: the pooled PFS-HR was 0.59 (95% CI = 0.51 to 0.69). The pooled median-PFS was 17.8 months (95% CI = 16.5 to 19.3) for the combination versus 11.7 months (95% CI = 11.1 to 12.7) for EGFR-TKI as monotherapy. No statistically significant differences between the two treatment-arms were observed in terms of both OS and ORR. The rate of grade equal or higher than 3 AEs was statistically significantly higher in patients treated with EGFR-TKI plus an anti-angiogenic drug: the pooled-Relative Risk was 1.72 (95% CI = 1.43 to 2.06). Ten RCTs were included in the NMA. All the three experimental treatments were associated with a statistically significant improvement of PFS as compared with first-generation EGFR-TKIs. When compared to each other, none of the three experimental treatments was statistically significantly associated with larger PFS or lower rate of grade ≥3AEs. Conclusion Patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC derived clinically meaningful larger PFS-benefit from the addition of an anti-angiogenic drug to a first-generation EGFR-TKI, at the cost of an increase of toxicitie

Fears and perception of the impact of COVID-19 on patients with lung cancer. A mono-institutional survey

In February 2020, Italy became one of the first countries to be plagued by the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, COVID-19. In March 2020, the Italian government decreed a lockdown for the whole country, which overturned communication systems, hospital organization, and access to patients and their relatives and carers. This issue had a particular regard for cancer patients. Our Thoracic Oncology Division therefore reorganized patient access in order to reduce the risk of contagion and, at the same time, encourage the continuation of treatment. Our staff contacted all patients to inform them of any changes in treatment planning, check that they were taking safety measures, and ascertain their feelings and whether they had any COVID-19 symptoms. To better understand patients’ fears and expectations of during the pandemic period, we created a nine-question interview, administered from April to May 2020 to 156 patients with lung cancer. Patients were classified by age, sex, comorbidity, disease stage, prior treatment, and treatment type. The survey showed that during the pandemic period some patients experienced fear of COVID-19, in particular: women (55% vs. 33%), patients with comorbidities (24% vs. 9%), and patients who had already received prior insult (radiotherapy or surgery) on the lung (30% vs. 11%). In addition, the patients who received oral treatment at home or for whom intravenous treatment was delayed, experienced a sense of relief (90% and 72% respectively). However, only 21% of the patients were more afraid of COVID-19 than of their cancer, in particular patients with long-term (> 12 months) vs. short-term cancer diagnosis (28% vs. 12.5%, respectively). Furthermore, the quarantine period or even just the lockdown period alone, worsened the quality of life of some patients (40%), especially those in oral treatment (47%). Our data demonstrate how lung cancer patients are more afraid of their disease than of a world pandemic. Also this interview indirectly highlights the clinician’s major guiding principle in correctly and appropriately managing not just the patient’s expectations of their illness and its treatment, but also and especially of the patient’s fears

Clinical and treatment features associated with improved 5-year survival rate in ALK-positive lung cancer treated with ALK-TKIs

n/

Correlation among different KRAS alterations, genetic co-mutations and PD-L1 expression in patients treated with immunotherapy in metastatic NSCLC

n/

Results of multilevel containment measures to better protect lung cancer patients from COVID-19. the IEO model

A novel coronavirus causing severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), named SARS-CoV-2, was identified at the end of 2019. The spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has progressively expanded from China, involving several countries throughout the world, leading to the classification of the disease as a pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO). According to published reports, COVID-19 severity and mortality are higher in elderly patients and those with active comorbidities. In particular, lung cancer patients were reported to be at high risk of pulmonary complications related to SARS-CoV2 infection. Therefore, the management of cancer care during the COVID-19 pandemic is a crucial issue, to which national and international oncology organizations have replied with recommendations concerning patients receiving anticancer treatments, delaying follow-up visits and limiting caregiver admission to the hospitals. In this historical moment, medical oncologists are required to consider the possibility to delay active treatment administration based on a case-by-case risk/benefit evaluation. Potential risks associated with COVID-19 infection should be considered, considering tumor histology and natural course, disease setting, clinical conditions, and disease burden, together with the expected benefit, toxicities (e.g., myelosuppression or interstitial lung disease), and response obtained from the planned or ongoing treatment. In this study, we report the results of proactive measures including social media, telemedicine, and telephone triage for screening patients with lung cancer during the COVID-19 outbreak in the European Institute of Oncology (Milan, Italy). Proactive management and containment measures, applied in a structured and daily way, has significantly aided the identification of advance patients with suspected symptoms related to COVID-19, limiting their admission to our cancer center; we have thus been more able to protect other patients from possible contamination and at the same time guarantee to the suspected patients the immediate treatment and evaluation in referral hospitals for COVID-19