4 research outputs found
Factors Associated with Non-Adherence to Drugs in Patients with Chronic Diseases Who Go to Pharmacies in Spain
Background. Pharmacological non-adherence in chronic diseases is 40â65%. No predictive profile of non-adherence exists in patients with multiple chronic diseases. Our study aimed to quantify the prevalence of non-adherence to pharmacological treatment and its associated factors in patients who visit pharmacies in Spain. Methods. This observational cross-sectional study included patients with one or more chronic diseases. The variables analyzed were demographics, diseases involved, self-medication, information about disease, and lifestyle. The main variable was adherence using the MoriskyâGreen test. A total of 132 pharmacies collaborated, providing 6327 patients representing all Spain regions (AprilâDecember 2016). Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was calculated. Results. Non-adherence was 48.4% (95% confidence interval (CI): 47.2â49.7%). The variables that reached significance in the multivariate model were: difficulty in taking medication, self-medication, desire for more information, smoking, lower physical activity, younger age and number of chronic treatments. Discrimination was satisfactory (area under the ROC curve = 70%). Our study found that 50% patients was non-adherent and we obtained a profile of variables associated with therapeutic non-adherence. Conclusions. It is cause for concern that in patients with multiple diseases and taking multiple medications, there is an association between non-adherence, self-medication and worse lifestyle
The role of collaborative, multistakeholder partnerships in reshaping the health management of patients with noncommunicable diseases during and after the COVID-19 pandemic
Background: Policies to combat the COVID-19 pandemic have disrupted the screening, diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of noncommunicable (NCD) patients while affecting NCD prevention and risk factor control. Aims: To discuss how the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic affected the health management of NCD patients, identify which aspects should be carried forward into future NCD management, and propose collaborative efforts among publicâprivate institutions to effectively shape NCD care models. Methods: The NCD Partnership, a collaboration between Upjohn and the European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing, held a virtual Advisory Board in July 2020 with multiple stakeholders; healthcare professionals (HCPs), policymakers, researchers, patient and informal carer advocacy groups, patient empowerment organizations, and industry experts. Results: The Advisory Board identified barriers to NCD care during the COVID-19 pandemic in four areas: lack of NCD management guidelines; disruption to integrated care and shift from hospital-based NCD care to more community and primary level care; infodemics and a lack of reliable health information for patients and HCPs on how to manage NCDs; lack of availability, training, standardization, and regulation of digital health tools. Conclusions: Multistakeholder partnerships can promote swift changes to NCD prevention and patient care. Intra- and inter-communication between all stakeholders should be facilitated involving all players in the development of clinical guidelines and digital health tools, health and social care restructuring, and patient support in the short-, medium- and long-term future. A comprehensive response to NCDs should be delivered to improve patient outcomes by providing strategic, scientific, and economic support
Validation of self-reported adherence in chronic patients visiting pharmacies and factors associated with the overestimation and underestimation of good adherence
Background Studies validating indirect methods to identify nonadherence in chronic patients who visit pharmacies are lacking. The aim of this study was to validate self-reported adherence and assess the variables associated with both overestimation and underestimation of good adherence when using this method. Materials and methods An observational, cross-sectional study was undertaken to validate self-reported adherence in 132 community pharmacies throughout Spain in 6237 chronic patients. The Morisky-Green test was used as the validation method and through a 2âĂâ2 table, the validity indicators, predictive values, and likelihood ratios were calculated. To assess the variables associated with both overestimation and underestimation of good adherence, multivariate logistic regression analysis and calculation of the area under the ROC curve were used to evaluate discriminatory capacity. Results Sensitivity was 27.8% (95% CI: 26.2â29.4) and specificity was 93.9% (95% CI: 93.1â94.7). Discrepancy analysis obtained a significant overestimation of good adherence (pâ<â0.001). The factors associated with overestimating good adherence were performing a mnemonic trick (pâ<â0.001), not self-medicating (pâ<â0.001), a high level of physical activity (pâ<â0.001), and an older age (pâ=â0.014). Factors associated with underestimation were self-medication (pâ<â0.001), desiring more information (pâ<â0.001), smoking (pâ=â0.014), not engaging in physical activity in the low (pâ=â0.006) or high (pâ<â0.001) categories, having a younger mean age (pâ=â0.007), and taking two to three (pâ=â0.029) or four or more (pâ<â0.001) chronic treatments. Conclusion Self-reported adherence has good specificity but poor sensitivity. The associated profiles of the discrepancies were obtained to identify both good and poor adherence
The role of collaborative, multistakeholder partnerships in reshaping the health management of patients with noncommunicable diseases during and after the COVID-19 pandemic
Background Policies to combat the COVID-19 pandemic have disrupted the
screening, diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of noncommunicable (NCD)
patients while affecting NCD prevention and risk factor control. Aims To
discuss how the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic affected the health
management of NCD patients, identify which aspects should be carried
forward into future NCD management, and propose collaborative efforts
among public-private institutions to effectively shape NCD care models.
Methods The NCD Partnership, a collaboration between Upjohn and the
European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing, held a
virtual Advisory Board in July 2020 with multiple stakeholders;
healthcare professionals (HCPs), policymakers, researchers, patient and
informal carer advocacy groups, patient empowerment organizations, and
industry experts. Results The Advisory Board identified barriers to NCD
care during the COVID-19 pandemic in four areas: lack of NCD management
guidelines; disruption to integrated care and shift from hospital-based
NCD care to more community and primary level care; infodemics and a lack
of reliable health information for patients and HCPs on how to manage
NCDs; lack of availability, training, standardization, and regulation of
digital health tools. Conclusions Multistakeholder partnerships can
promote swift changes to NCD prevention and patient care. Intra- and
inter-communication between all stakeholders should be facilitated
involving all players in the development of clinical guidelines and
digital health tools, health and social care restructuring, and patient
support in the short-, medium- and long-term future. A comprehensive
response to NCDs should be delivered to improve patient outcomes by
providing strategic, scientific, and economic support