2 research outputs found

    Visualiser l’influence des lobbies dans la politique suisse

    Get PDF
    Le Parlement fĂ©dĂ©ral est composĂ© de deux Chambres qui sont constituĂ©es de parlementaires. Les diffĂ©rentes lois sont soumises aux votes de ces derniers. Les lobbies essaient d’influencer les parlementaires afin de diriger les votes Ă  leur avantage. Lobbywatch, le mandant, est une association qui rĂ©pertorie les liens entre les lobbies et les parlementaires. L’objectif de ce travail est d’obtenir un prototype qui croise les donnĂ©es du mandant avec les votes des parlementaires afin de visualiser l’influence des lobbies et ainsi rendre le Parlement plus transparent

    Which lobby won the vote ? ::visualizing influence of interest groups in Swiss Parliament

    No full text
    Members of national parliaments (MPs) often have ties to interest groups, or ‘lobbies’, which might try to influence policies. In order to quantify the influence of lobbies on parliamentary decisions, we design an online platform that allows users to explore votes results, focusing on how interest groups members voted, in order to identify which lobbies voted for or against a given measure and in which proportion. We apply this approach to the specific case of the Swiss Federal Parliament. To achieve this, we build a database that combines two sources of openly available data: (1) a register of politicians’ interest ties, main- tained by Lobbywatch.ch, an association dedicated to the monitoring of Swiss politicians’ interest ties and (2) the individual votes results in the Swiss Federal Parliament, accessible through a web-service provided by the parliamentary service of the Swiss government. Our platform allows users to explore the following perspectives of the data: (1) general information about lobbies (e.g. size, domains), (2) individual votes results, with a drill-down by lobby that shows the distribution of votes in each interest group for each specific vote, and (3) overall (dis)agreement of individual MPs with their party and lobbies across all considered votes. We believe that such an exploration platform can be a powerful tool to help quantify the influence of lobbies in politics. Indeed, a qualitative evaluation of the prototype was conducted with 7 domain experts (5 journalists and 2 politicians). They were all able to complete successfully the submitted tasks. They rated its usability and usefulness as rather high (mean respectively 7.4/10 and 6.8/10). Moreover, most of them reported that such a platform has the potential to increase the accountability of politicians towards the people and consequentially to raise the trust of the population in their elected representatives
    corecore