Review of "Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness"

Review of the book "Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness" by Richard H. Thaler and Cass R. Sunstein

Book review: Noise: a flaw in human judgment by Daniel Kahneman, Olivier Sibony and Cass R. Sunstein

In Noise: A Flaw in Human Judgment, Daniel Kahneman, Olivier Sibony and Cass R. Sunstein explore how ‘noise’ affects human judgment and reflect on what we can do to address this. This novel book will help readers to better understand the processes we undertake in decision-making and how to encourage more informed and principled decisions, writes Kaibalyapati Mishra. Noise: A Flaw in Human Judgment. Daniel Kahneman, Olivier Sibony and Cass R. Sunstein. William Collins. 2021

Sunstein, Cass R.: Behavioral Science and Public Policy

Review of the book: Sunstein, Cass R.: Behavioral Science and Public Policy. Elements in Public Economics, Cambridge University Press.Recensión del libro de Sunstein, Cass R.: Behavioral Science and Public Policy. Elements in Public Economics, Cambridge University Press

Nudge-Proof: Distributive Justice and the Ethics of Nudging

A review of Cass R. Sunstein, The Ethics of Influence: Government in the Age of Behavioral Science

Unmasking Judicial Extremism

Review of Cass R. Sunstein, Radicals in Robes: Why Extreme Right-Wing Courts Are Wrong for America (2005

Of Gnarled Pegs and Round Holes: Sunstein\u27s Civic Republicanism and the American Constitution: A Review Essay of the Partial Constitution. by Cass R. Sunstein.

Of Gnarled Pegs and Round Holes: Sunstein\u27s Civic Republicanism and the American Constitution: A Review essay of The Partial Constitution. By Cass R. Sunstein. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 1993. Pp. vi, 414. Reviewed by: Robert W. Bennett

Unmasking Judicial Extremism

Review of Cass R. Sunstein, Radicals in Robes: Why Extreme Right-Wing Courts Are Wrong for America (2005

Intergenerationalism and Constitutional Law

A Review of Constitutional Law by Geoffrey R. Stone, Louis M. Seidman, Cass R. Sunstein and Mark V. Tushnet and Constitutional Law: Cases -- Comments -- Questions by William B. Lockhart, Yale Kamisar, Jesse H. Choper, and Steven H. Shiffri

On the Costs and Benefits of Aggressive Judicial Review of Agency Action

In this essay, the author undertakes three tasks. The first is to describe some of the difficulties of defining benefits in the setting of judicial review of administrative action. The second task is to offer reasons, though tentative and largely anecdotal ones, for an affirmative answer to the question whether aggressive judicial review has produced net benefits. At the very least, the author suggests, aggressive judicial review has had significant benefits in many settings. The third and final task is to outline some proposals by which to increase the benefits, and decrease the risks, of an aggressive judicial posture in administrative law