206 research outputs found

    The Continuing Evolution of Criminal Constitutional Law in State Courts

    Get PDF
    Although early state constitutions were important and ambitious documents for their time, the development of state constitutional law stagnated after the drafting and adoption of the federal constitution., As the doctrine of federalism has resurfaced, however, states have begun to turn to their constitutions to grant more protection for their citizens. The states\u27 criminal constitutional laws have changed significantly and continue to evolve today. In the 1960s, the Warren Court expanded basic protections for criminal defendants by finding that the Fourteenth Amendment incorporates the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments. The Court held that the Eighth Amendment prohibits cruel and unusual punishment by the states. The Court extended the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination to criminal defendants, held that this privilege also requires police to give warnings to suspects prior to custodial interrogations, and applied the double jeopardy clause to states. The Court extended the Sixth Amendment to give criminal defendants further rights: to be represented by an attorney, to be confronted by the witnesses against them,o to have a speedy trial, to have a trial by an impartial jury, and to have a compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in favor of the defense. During this period, states hardly had time to consider what protections their own constitutions might give to criminal defendants because the Supreme Court was expanding the federal rights so rapidly to citizens accused of state-law crimes

    The Effectiveness of Self-Regulatory Gambling Advertising Rules on the Protection of Minors and Vulnerable Persons (UK based study)

    Full text link
    The liberalisation of the gambling advertising facilitated in the UK by the Gambling Act 2005 led to a natural but phenomenal overall expansion of gambling advertising. While any claims that such gambling marketing may lead to harm continue to be strongly contested, it is at least implicitly accepted that some vulnerable persons, including minors, may require specific protection as mandated by the statutory licensing objective. In the UK this is aimed to be achieved by ensuring that gambling advertisements are ‘socially responsible’ and by the timing/placement restrictions. Compliance is monitored by the ASA that also publishes standards-setting Codes and adjudicates on complaints. There is, however, a paucity of independent research that evaluates whether the practical application of the high-level rules is sufficiently aligned with the third licensing objective. The paper provides a systematic analysis of the ASA adjudications and draws from findings collected from minors during focus groups carried out as part of the author’s PhD thesis. It argues that while the existing enforcement framework and self-regulatory principles go a long way in restraining the industry from acute exploitation they are not sufficiently definite to eliminate the possibility of emotive appeal, do not encompass all advertising techniques, are too focused on technical approach at the expense of a more in-depth assessment of the potential wider impact of the image portrayed, and still rely on the transmission theory that does not necessarily correspond to how minors construct and react to such advertisements. Presents insight from minors’ views and suggests practical recommendations

    Reverse Engineering of Software for Interoperability and Analysis

    Get PDF
    The rapid evolution of computer technology raises difficult questions about the scope of protection the law should afford computer programs. Computer programs are uniquely different from traditional literary works protected by the copyright laws, because they have machine-like properties, are primarily functional in nature, and frequently are distributed in a form that humans cannot read. Despite these differences, however, computer programs have received protection under the copyright paradigm along with literary and artistic works. The United States historically has employed a highly protectionist approach to computer programs, as evidenced by early software infringement decisions in which courts slowly expanded protection by prohibiting copying of not only the literal or tangible aspects of computer programs but also the nonliteral elements. Recently, some courts have made an underlying shift in their interpretation of legal doctrine and policy from a broad standard of infringement that favors software copyright owners to a more narrow standard
    • …
    corecore