Syngeneic mouse model of human HER2+ metastatic breast cancer for the evaluation of trastuzumab emtansine combined with oncolytic rhabdovirus

BackgroundEstablished mouse models of HER2+ cancer are based on the over-expression of rodent Neu/Erbb2 homologues, which are incompatible with human HER2 (huHER2) targeted therapeutics. Additionally, the use of immune-deficient xenograft or transgenic models precludes assessment of native anti-tumour immune responses. These hurdles have been a challenge for our understanding of the immune mechanisms behind huHER2-targeting immunotherapies.MethodsTo assess the immune impacts of our huHER2-targeted combination strategy, we generated a syngeneic mouse model of huHER2+ breast cancer, using a truncated form of huHER2, HER2T. Following validation of this model, we next treated tumour-bearing with our immunotherapy strategy: oncolytic vesicular stomatitis virus (VSVΔ51) with clinically approved antibody-drug conjugate targeting huHER2, trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1). We assessed efficacy through tumour control, survival, and immune analyses.ResultsThe generated truncated HER2T construct was non-immunogenic in wildtype BALB/c mice upon expression in murine mammary carcinoma 4T1.2 cells. Treatment of 4T1.2-HER2T tumours with VSVΔ51+T-DM1 yielded robust curative efficacy compared to controls, and broad immunologic memory. Interrogation of anti-tumour immunity revealed tumour infiltration by CD4+ T cells, and activation of B, NK, and dendritic cell responses, as well as tumour-reactive serum IgG.ConclusionsThe 4T1.2-HER2T model was used to evaluate the anti-tumour immune responses following our complex pharmacoviral treatment strategy. These data demonstrate utility of the syngeneic HER2T model for assessment of huHER2-targeted therapies in an immune-competent in vivo setting. We further demonstrated that HER2T can be implemented in multiple other syngeneic tumour models, including but not limited to colorectal and ovarian models. These data also suggest that the HER2T platform may be used to assess a range of surface-HER2T targeting approaches, such as CAR-T, T-cell engagers, antibodies, or even retargeted oncolytic viruses

Assessing the Completeness of Reporting in Preclinical Oncolytic Virus Therapy Studies

Irreproducibility of preclinical findings could be a significant barrier to the “bench-to-bedside” development of oncolytic viruses (OVs). A contributing factor is the incomplete and non-transparent reporting of study methodology and design. Using the NIH Principles and Guidelines for Reporting Preclinical Research, a core set of seven recommendations, we evaluated the completeness of reporting of preclinical OV studies. We also developed an evidence map identifying the current trends in OV research. A systematic search of MEDLINE and Embase identified all relevant articles published over an 18 month period. We screened 1,554 articles, and 236 met our a priori-defined inclusion criteria. Adenovirus (43%) was the most commonly used viral platform. Frequently investigated cancers included colorectal (14%), skin (12%), and breast (11%). Xenograft implantation (61%) in mice (96%) was the most common animal model. The use of preclinical reporting guidelines was listed in 0.4% of articles. Biological and technical replicates were completely reported in 1% of studies, statistics in 49%, randomization in 1%, blinding in 2%, sample size estimation in 0%, and inclusion/exclusion criteria in 0%. Overall, completeness of reporting in the preclinical OV therapy literature is poor. This may hinder efforts to interpret, replicate, and ultimately translate promising preclinical OV findings

The Rubella virus capsid is an anti-apoptotic protein that attenuates the pore-forming ability of Bax.

Apoptosis is an important mechanism by which virus-infected cells are eliminated from the host. Accordingly, many viruses have evolved strategies to prevent or delay apoptosis in order to provide a window of opportunity in which virus replication, assembly and egress can take place. Interfering with apoptosis may also be important for establishment and/or maintenance of persistent infections. Whereas large DNA viruses have the luxury of encoding accessory proteins whose primary function is to undermine programmed cell death pathways, it is generally thought that most RNA viruses do not encode these types of proteins. Here we report that the multifunctional capsid protein of Rubella virus is a potent inhibitor of apoptosis. The main mechanism of action was specific for Bax as capsid bound Bax and prevented Bax-induced apoptosis but did not bind Bak nor inhibit Bak-induced apoptosis. Intriguingly, interaction with capsid protein resulted in activation of Bax in the absence of apoptotic stimuli, however, release of cytochrome c from mitochondria and concomitant activation of caspase 3 did not occur. Accordingly, we propose that binding of capsid to Bax induces the formation of hetero-oligomers that are incompetent for pore formation. Importantly, data from reverse genetic studies are consistent with a scenario in which the anti-apoptotic activity of capsid protein is important for virus replication. If so, this would be among the first demonstrations showing that blocking apoptosis is important for replication of an RNA virus. Finally, it is tempting to speculate that other slowly replicating RNA viruses employ similar mechanisms to avoid killing infected cells

From scourge to cure: tumour-selective viral pathogenesis as a new strategy against cancer.

Tumour mutations corrupt cellular pathways, and accumulate to disrupt, dysregulate, and ultimately avoid mechanisms of cellular control. Yet the very changes that tumour cells undergo to secure their own growth success also render them susceptible to viral infection. Enhanced availability of surface receptors, disruption of antiviral sensing, elevated metabolic activity, disengagement of cell cycle controls, hyperactivation of mitogenic pathways, and apoptotic avoidance all render the malignant cell environment highly supportive to viral replication. The therapeutic use of oncolytic viruses (OVs) with a natural tropism for infecting and subsequently lysing tumour cells is a rapidly progressing area of cancer research. While many OVs exhibit an inherent degree of tropism for transformed cells, this can be further promoted through pharmacological interventions and/or the introduction of viral mutations that generate recombinant oncolytic viruses adapted to successfully replicate only in a malignant cellular environment. Such adaptations that augment OV tumour selectivity are already improving the therapeutic outlook for cancer, and there remains tremendous untapped potential for further innovation

Extracellular Vesicles and Viruses: Two Intertwined Entities

Viruses share many attributes in common with extracellular vesicles (EVs). The cellular machinery that is used for EV production, packaging of substrates and secretion is also commonly manipulated by viruses for replication, assembly and egress. Viruses can increase EV production or manipulate EVs to spread their own genetic material or proteins, while EVs can play a key role in regulating viral infections by transporting immunomodulatory molecules and viral antigens to initiate antiviral immune responses. Ultimately, the interactions between EVs and viruses are highly interconnected, which has led to interesting discoveries in their associated roles in the progression of different diseases, as well as the new promise of combinational therapeutics. In this review, we summarize the relationships between viruses and EVs and discuss major developments from the past five years in the engineering of virus-EV therapies

Lighting a Fire in the Tumor Microenvironment Using Oncolytic Immunotherapy

Oncolytic virus (OV) therapy is potentially a game-changing cancer treatment that has garnered significant interest due to its versatility and multi-modal approaches towards tumor eradication. In the field of cancer immunotherapy, the immunological phenotype of the tumor microenvironment (TME) is an important determinant of disease prognosis and therapeutic success. There is accumulating data that OVs are capable of dramatically altering the TME immune landscape, leading to improved antitumor activity alone or in combination with assorted immune modulators. Herein, we review how OVs disrupt the immunosuppressive TME and can be used strategically to create a “pro-immune” microenvironment that enables and promotes potent, long-lasting host antitumor immune responses. Keywords: Tumor microenvironment, Oncolytic viruses, Cancer immunotherapies, Combination therapie

Oncolytic Viruses Are Designed to Grow in the Tumour Niche.

<p>There are at least six key critical features of tumour cell growth that can be targeted by oncolytic viruses. These include changes in the expression of viral-host cell receptors, the antiviral response, nucleotide and protein synthesis, cell proliferation, and apoptosis. A number of engineered or selected oncolytic viruses exist that can exploit one or more of these malignant characteristics.</p