Additional file 7: Table S5. of Validation of a high resolution NGS method for detecting spinal muscular atrophy carriers among phase 3 participants in the 1000 Genomes Project

Results for all volunteer and Coriell samples. (XLSX 49 kb

Additional file 11: Figure S5. of Validation of a high resolution NGS method for detecting spinal muscular atrophy carriers among phase 3 participants in the 1000 Genomes Project

95 % Posterior (credible) intervals for π are plotted for each 1000 Genomes Project subject. Samples are colored and symbolized as in Fig. 5. (PDF 62 kb

Additional file 10: Figure S4. of Validation of a high resolution NGS method for detecting spinal muscular atrophy carriers among phase 3 participants in the 1000 Genomes Project

A plot of the scaled proportion of reads aligning to SMN1 versus their frequency for (a) the volunteer and Coriell subjects and (b) the 1000 Genomes subjects. In both datasets, most individuals have an estimate of π to the right of the line at 0.38; it is unlikely they are carriers. (PDF 114 kb

MOESM3 of High-throughput SuperSAGE for gene expression analysis of Nicotiana tabacum–Rhizoctonia solani interaction

Additional file 3: Table S2. List of the up and down regulated annotated tags with highest fold change of tobacco plants inoculated with Rhizoctonia solani

MOESM4 of High-throughput SuperSAGE for gene expression analysis of Nicotiana tabacum–Rhizoctonia solani interaction

Additional file 4. Relative expression of seven differentially up expressed UniTags in N. tabacum cv. ‘Sumatra’ plants at 15 days post-infiltration. Bars represent mean values and standard error of the results obtained from three replicates. A total of 30 plants with the lowest relative expression were used to calculate the disease incidence after disease susceptibility testing

MICROTOX test, validation with Tubifex tubifex and QSAR analysis

<p>Fold change of ‘<i>Ca</i>. L. asiaticus’ titers in HLB-affected citrus plants treated or untreated with eBL after 12 months. The fold-change was calculated by dividing the average of total ‘<i>Ca</i>. L. asiaticus’ titers before the applications by the total ‘<i>Ca</i>. L. asiaticus’ titers after 12 months of applications. All the plants with and without typical symptoms of HLB prior to treatment were included in this analysis. Each point represents mean values with standard error (30 replicates per treatment). Significant difference among means was determined by one-way ANOVA least significant difference mean separation at *P <i><</i> 0.05; F = 5.316.</p

Induction of defense-related genes in HLB-affected citrus plants treated with eBL.

<p>(A) Superoxide dismutase (SOD), (B) Glutathione peroxidase (GPX1), (C) Chitinase (CHI1), (D) Beta-1, 3 glucanase, (E) Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL), (F) Allene oxide synthase (AOS), (G) Fatty acid hydroperoxide lyase (HPL). Accession numbers are given in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0146223#pone.0146223.s008" target="_blank">S1 Table</a>. Results are based on three experiments, each with three replicates per treatment. Bars indicate standard error of the mean and least significant difference at *P <i><</i> 0.05; **P <0.01; NS, not significant.</p