Disruption of Nrf2, a Key Inducer of Antioxidant Defenses, Attenuates ApoE-Mediated Atherosclerosis in Mice

Background: Oxidative stress and inflammation are two critical factors that drive the formation of plaques in atherosclerosis. Nrf2 is a redox-sensitive transcription factor that upregulates a battery of antioxidative genes and cytoprotective enzymes that constitute the cellular response to oxidative stress. Our previous studies have shown that disruption of Nrf2 in mice (Nrf2-/-) causes increased susceptibility to pulmonary emphysema, asthma and sepsis due to increased oxidative stress and inflammation. Here we have tested the hypothesis that disruption of Nrf2 in mice causes increased atherosclerosis. Principal Findings: To investigate the role of Nrf2 in the development of atherosclerosis, we crossed Nrf2-/- mice with apoliporotein E-deficient (ApoE-/- mice. ApoE-/- and ApoE-/- Nrf2-/- mice were fed an atherogenic diet for 20 weeks, and plaque area was assessed in the aortas. Surprisingly, ApoE-/- Nrf2-/- mice exhibited significantly smaller plaque area than ApoE-/- controls (11.5% vs 29.5%). This decrease in plaque area observed in ApoE-/- Nrf2-/- mice was associated with a significant decrease in uptake of modified low density lipoproteins (AcLDL) by isolated macrophages from ApoE-/- Nrf2-/- mice. Furthermore, atherosclerotic plaques and isolated macrophages from ApoE-/- Nrf2-/- mice exhibited decreased expression of the scavenger receptor CD36. Conclusions: Nrf2 is pro-atherogenic in mice, despite its antioxidative function. The net pro-atherogenic effect of Nrf2 may be mediated via positive regulation of CD36. Our data demonstrates that the potential effects of Nrf2-targeted therapies on cardiovascular disease need to be investigated.9 page(s

Histone deacetylase inhibitors: potential targets responsible for their anti-cancer effect

The histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) have demonstrated anticancer efficacy across a range of malignancies, most impressively in the hematological cancers. It is uncertain whether this clinical efficacy is attributable predominantly to their ability to induce apoptosis and differentiation in the cancer cell, or to their ability to prime the cell to other pro-death stimuli such as those from the immune system. HDACi-induced apoptosis occurs through altered expression of genes encoding proteins in both intrinsic and extrinsic apoptotic pathways; through effects on the proteasome/aggresome systems; through the production of reactive oxygen species, possibly by directly inducing DNA damage; and through alterations in the tumor microenvironment. In addition HDACi increase the immunogenicity of tumor cells and modulate cytokine signaling and potentially T-cell polarization in ways that may contribute the anti-cancer effect in vivo. Here, we provide an overview of current thinking on the mechanisms of HDACi activity, with attention given to the hematological malignancies as well as scientific observations arising from the clinical trials. We also focus on the immune effects of these agents

Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)1.

In 2008, we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, this topic has received increasing attention, and many scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Thus, it is important to formulate on a regular basis updated guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Despite numerous reviews, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to evaluate autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. Here, we present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a dogmatic set of rules, because the appropriateness of any assay largely depends on the question being asked and the system being used. Moreover, no individual assay is perfect for every situation, calling for the use of multiple techniques to properly monitor autophagy in each experimental setting. Finally, several core components of the autophagy machinery have been implicated in distinct autophagic processes (canonical and noncanonical autophagy), implying that genetic approaches to block autophagy should rely on targeting two or more autophagy-related genes that ideally participate in distinct steps of the pathway. Along similar lines, because multiple proteins involved in autophagy also regulate other cellular pathways including apoptosis, not all of them can be used as a specific marker for bona fide autophagic responses. Here, we critically discuss current methods of assessing autophagy and the information they can, or cannot, provide. Our ultimate goal is to encourage intellectual and technical innovation in the field

Effect of vitamin E on atherogenesis in LDL receptor-deficient rabbits.

Vitamin E has been postulated to be antiatherogenic because of its antioxidative potency. However, intervention studies published to date have yielded conflicting results. To assess the antiatherogenic effect of vitamin E, two groups of 10 Watanabe heritable hyperlipidemic (WHHL) rabbits each were fed chow pellets containing D-alpha-tocopherol-acetate at either 40 mg/kg (control group) or 1000 mg/kg (vitamin E group) for 28 weeks. Plasma vitamin E levels in the vitamin E group increased five-fold over those controls (475.5 mumol/l vs. 95.9 mumol/l). The average total plasma cholesterol during the treatment period was not significantly affected by vitamin E (control, 950 +/- 113 mg/dl; vitamin E, 884 +/- 90 mg/dl). Vitamin E treatment had no significant effects on body weights, lipoprotein profiles, or HDL levels. The protection of plasma LDL against oxidation was determined by ex vivo by measuring the lag time in the formation of conjugated dienes in a standardized Cu22+(-)containing system. Lag time in the vitamin E-treated group increased four-fold over that in controls (404 vs. 123 min). The extent of atherosclerosis determined at the end of the study was not significantly different in the two groups (control group, 59.2 +/- 6.0%; vitamin E group, 50.6 +/- 6.2%, P = 0.33). Analysis of the correlation between vitamin E levels and extent of lesions also failed to indicate an antiatherosclerotic effect of vitamin E treatment. We previously reported that an analogue of probucol that provided antioxidative protection similar to that provided by vitamin E failed to prevent atherogenesis in WHHL-rabbits. In contrast probucol conveyed a much greater degree of antioxidant protection and effectively reduced atherosclerosis in rabbits. The results of the present study therefore support the hypothesis that a threshold level of antioxidative protection of LDL may be required to inhibit atherosclerosis

Effect of vitamin E on atherogenesis in LDL receptor-deficient rabbits.

Vitamin E has been postulated to be antiatherogenic because of its antioxidative potency. However, intervention studies published to date have yielded conflicting results. To assess the antiatherogenic effect of vitamin E, two groups of 10 Watanabe heritable hyperlipidemic (WHHL) rabbits each were fed chow pellets containing D-alpha-tocopherol-acetate at either 40 mg/kg (control group) or 1000 mg/kg (vitamin E group) for 28 weeks. Plasma vitamin E levels in the vitamin E group increased five-fold over those controls (475.5 mumol/l vs. 95.9 mumol/l). The average total plasma cholesterol during the treatment period was not significantly affected by vitamin E (control, 950 +/- 113 mg/dl; vitamin E, 884 +/- 90 mg/dl). Vitamin E treatment had no significant effects on body weights, lipoprotein profiles, or HDL levels. The protection of plasma LDL against oxidation was determined by ex vivo by measuring the lag time in the formation of conjugated dienes in a standardized Cu22+(-)containing system. Lag time in the vitamin E-treated group increased four-fold over that in controls (404 vs. 123 min). The extent of atherosclerosis determined at the end of the study was not significantly different in the two groups (control group, 59.2 +/- 6.0%; vitamin E group, 50.6 +/- 6.2%, P = 0.33). Analysis of the correlation between vitamin E levels and extent of lesions also failed to indicate an antiatherosclerotic effect of vitamin E treatment. We previously reported that an analogue of probucol that provided antioxidative protection similar to that provided by vitamin E failed to prevent atherogenesis in WHHL-rabbits. In contrast probucol conveyed a much greater degree of antioxidant protection and effectively reduced atherosclerosis in rabbits. The results of the present study therefore support the hypothesis that a threshold level of antioxidative protection of LDL may be required to inhibit atherosclerosis