La publicidad engañosa en Colombia

Abogado (a)Pregrad

GW190412: measuring a black-hole recoil direction through higher-order gravitational-wave modes

General relativity predicts that gravitational waves (GWs) carry linear momentum. Consequently, the remnant black hole of a black-hole merger can inherit a recoil velocity or ``kick'' of crucial implications in, e.g, black-hole formation scenarios. While the kick magnitude is determined by the mass ratio and spins of the source, estimating its direction requires a measurement of the two orientation angles of the source. While the orbital inclination angle is commonly reported in GW observations, the azimuthal one has been to date ignored. We show how the presence of more than one GW emission mode allows constraining this angle and, consequently, determines the kick direction in a real GW event. %We show that the higher-order mode content GW190412 enables the determination of both these angles and, consequently, the kick direction. We analyse the GW190412 signal, which contains higher-order modes, with a numerical-relativity surrogate waveform model for black-hole mergers. We find that while GW190412 is barely informative about the kick magnitude, we can constrain its direction. This forms angles $\theta_{KL}^{\text{-100M}}=28^{+23}_{-11}\,\deg$ with the orbital angular momentum defined at a reference time $t_{\rm ref}=-100\,M$ before merger (being preferentially kicked upwards), $\theta_{KN}=37^{+15}_{-12}\,\deg$ with the line-of-sight and $\phi_{KN}^{\text{-100M}}=46^{+32}_{-41}\,\deg$ with the projection of the latter onto the former, all at the $68\%$ credible level. We briefly discuss the potential application of this type of measurement for multi-messenger observations of black-hole mergers occurring in Active Galactic Nuclei.Comment: 8 pages, 4 figure

Systematic challenges for future gravitational wave measurements of precessing binary black holes

The properties of precessing, coalescing binary black holes are presently inferred through comparison with two approximate models of compact binary coalescence. In this work we show these two models often disagree substantially when binaries have modestly large spins ($a\gtrsim 0.4$) and modest mass ratios ($q\gtrsim 2$). We demonstrate these disagreements using standard figures of merit and the parameters inferred for recent detections of binary black holes. By comparing to numerical relativity, we confirm these disagreements reflect systematic errors. We provide concrete examples to demonstrate that these systematic errors can significantly impact inferences about astrophysically significant binary parameters. For the immediate future, parameter inference for binary black holes should be performed with multiple models (including numerical relativity), and carefully validated by performing inference under controlled circumstances with similar synthetic events.Comment: 12 pages, 9 figure

Impact of Bayesian Priors on the Inferred Masses of Quasi-Circular Intermediate-Mass Black Hole Binaries

Observation of gravitational waves from inspiralling binary black holes has offered a unique opportunity to study the physical parameters of the component black holes. To infer these parameters, Bayesian methods are employed in conjunction with general relativistic waveform models that describe the source's inspiral, merger, and ringdown. The results depend not only on the accuracy of the waveform models but also on the underlying fiducial prior distribution used for the analysis. In particular, when the pre-merger phase of the signal is barely observable within the detectors' bandwidth, as is currently the case with intermediate-mass black hole binary signals in ground-based gravitational wave detectors, different prior assumptions can lead to different interpretations. In this study, we utilise the gravitational-wave inference library, $\texttt{Parallel Bilby}$, to evaluate the impact of mass prior choices on the parameter estimation of intermediate-mass black hole binary signals. While previous studies focused primarily on analysing event data, we offer a broader, more controlled study by using simulations. Our findings suggest that the posteriors in total mass, mass ratio and luminosity distance are contingent on the assumed mass prior distribution used during the inference process. This is especially true when the signal lacks sufficient pre-merger information and/or has inadequate power in the higher-order radiation multipoles. In conclusion, our study underscores the importance of thoroughly investigating similarly heavy events in current detector sensitivity using a diverse choice of priors. Absent such an approach, adopting a flat prior on the binary's redshifted total mass and mass ratio emerges as a reasonable choice, preventing biases in the detector-frame mass posteriors.Comment: 16 Pages, 7 figure