Inter-Rater Agreement on Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale (CPSS) and Prehospital Acute Stroke Severity Scale (PASS) Between EMS Providers, Neurology Residents and Neurology Consultants

Martin Gude,1 Hans Kirkegaard,1,2 Rolf Blauenfeldt,3 Anne Behrndtz,3 Jeppe Mainz,3 Ingunn Riddervold,4 Claus Z Simonsen,2,3 Niels Hjort,2,3 Søren P Johnsen,5 Grethe Andersen,2,3 Jan Brink Valentin5 1Department of Research and Development, Prehospital Emergency Medical Services, Central Denmark Region; and Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; 2Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; 3Danish Stroke Center, Department of Neurology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; 4Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation, Oslo, Norway; 5Danish Center for Clinical Health Services Research, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, DenmarkCorrespondence: Martin Gude, Prehospital Emergency Medical Services, Central Denmark Region and Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark, Email [email protected]: To examine the agreement between emergency medical service (EMS) providers, neurology residents and neurology consultants, using the Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale (CPSS) and the Prehospital Acute Stroke Severity Scale (PASS).Methods: Patients with stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA) and stroke mimic were included upon primary stroke admission or during rehabilitation. Patients were included from June 2018 to September 2019. Video recordings were made of patients being assessed with CPSS and PASS. The recordings were later presented to the healthcare professionals. To determine relative and absolute interrater reliability in terms of inter-rater agreement (IRA), we used generalisability theory. Group-level agreement was determined against a gold standard and presented as an area under the curve (AUC). The gold standard was a consensus agreement between two neurology consultants.Results: A total of 120 patient recordings were assessed by 30 EMS providers, two neurology residents and two neurology consultants. Using the CPSS and the PASS, a total of 1,800 assessments were completed by EMS providers, 240 by neurology residents and 240 by neurology consultants. The overall relative and absolute IRA for all items combined from the CPSS and PASS score was 0.84 (95% CI 0.80; 0.87) and 0.81 (95% CI 0.77; 0.85), respectively. Using the CPSS, the agreement on a group-level resulted in AUCs of 0.83 (95% CI 0.78; 0.88) for the EMS providers and 0.86 (95% CI 0.82; 0.90) for the neurology residents when compared with the gold standard. Using the PASS, the AUC was 0.82 (95% CI 0.77; 0.87) for the EMS providers and 0.88 (95% CI 0.84; 0.93) for the neurology residents.Conclusion: The high relative and absolute inter-rater agreement underpins a high robustness/generalisability of the two scales. A high agreement exists across individual raters and different groups of healthcare professionals supporting widespread applicability of the stroke scales.Plain Language Summary: Early stroke identification is pivotal to enable faster treatment. To aid this identification, many symptom-based stroke scales have been constructed for both stroke screening and severity assessment. In the prehospital environment, several scales have been evaluated on performance, but only few studies have evaluated the agreement between the ambulance personnel (emergency medical service (EMS) providers) and stroke physicians when interpreting the assessed symptoms in the scales. It is of great importance to know how EMS providers interpret symptoms seen in connection with the use of the scales to focus the continuous training of the EMS providers but also to aid the decision on which scale to implement in ambulances. From previous studies, we know that complex stroke scales are used to a considerably lesser extent than more simple scales, which could be caused by difficulties interpreting specific symptoms. In this study, a variety of methods was applied to determine the inter-rater agreement for two simple stroke scales using dichotomously evaluated symptoms. High inter-rater agreement between EMS providers and Stroke Neurologists exists both between individual raters and between raters grouped according to their profession and seniority. Previous studies have also found high inter-rater agreement for simple stroke scales but lesser agreement for more advanced scales. In conclusion, simple stroke scales seem to produce the highest agreement.Keywords: observer variation, prehospital emergency care, emergency medical service provider, neurologists, strok

Clinical Characteristics and Outcome of Patients With Hemorrhagic Transformation After Intravenous Thrombolysis in the WAKE-UP Trial

Background: Hemorrhagic transformation (HT) is an important complication of intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase. HT can show a wide range from petechiae to parenchymal hematoma with mass effect with varying clinical impact. We studied clinical and imaging characteristics of patients with HT and evaluated whether different types of HT are associated with functional outcome. Methods: We performed a post-hoc analysis of WAKE-UP, a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of MRI-guided intravenous alteplase in unknown onset stroke. HT was assessed on follow-up MRI or CT and diagnosed as hemorrhagic infarction type 1 and type 2 (HI1 and HI2, combined as HI), and parenchymal hemorrhage type 1 and type 2 (PH1 and PH2, combined as PH). Severity of stroke symptoms was assessed using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at baseline. Stroke lesion volume was measured on baseline diffusion weighted imaging (DWI). Primary endpoint was a favorable outcome defined as a modified Rankin Scale score 0-1 at 90 days. Results: Of 483 patients included in the analysis, 95 (19.7%) showed HI and 21 (4.4%) had PH. Multiple logistic regression analysis identified treatment with alteplase (OR, 2.08 [95% CI, 1.28-3.40]), baseline NIHSS score (OR, 1.11 [95% CI, 1.05-1.17]), DWI lesion volume (OR, 1.03 [95% CI, 1.01-1.05]), baseline glucose levels (OR, 1.01 [95% CI, 1.00-1.01]) and atrial fibrillation (OR, 3.02 [95% CI, 1.57-5.80]) as predictors of any HT. The same parameters predicted HI. Predictors of PH were baseline NIHSS score (OR, 1.11 [95% CI, 1.01-1.22]) and as a trend treatment with alteplase (OR, 2.40 [95% CI, 0.93-6.96]). PH was associated with lower odds of favorable outcome (OR 0.25, 95% [CI 0.05-0.86]), while HI was not. Conclusion: Our results indicate that HI is associated with stroke severity, cardiovascular risk factors and thrombolysis. PH is a rare complication, more frequent in severe stroke and with thrombolysis. In contrast to HI, PH is associated with worse functional outcome. The impact of HT after MRI-guided intravenous alteplase for unknown onset stroke on clinical outcome is similar as in the trials of stroke thrombolysis within a known early time-window

Polypharmacy, functional outcome and treatment effect of intravenous alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Polypharmacy is an important challenge in clinical practice. Our aim was to determine the effect of polypharmacy on functional outcome and treatment effect of alteplase in acute ischaemic stroke. METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of the randomized, placebo-controlled WAKE-UP trial of magnetic resonance imaging guided intravenous alteplase in unknown onset stroke. Polypharmacy was defined as an intake of five or more medications at baseline. Comorbidities were assessed by the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). The primary efficacy variable was favourable outcome defined by a score of 0-1 on the modified Rankin Scale at 90 days. Logistic regression analysis was used to test for an association of polypharmacy with functional outcome, and for interaction of polypharmacy and the effect of thrombolysis. RESULTS: Polypharmacy was present in 133/503 (26%) patients. Patients with polypharmacy were older (mean age 70 vs. 64 years; p < 0.0001) and had a higher score on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale at baseline (median 7 vs. 5; p = 0.0007). A comorbidity load defined by a CCI score ≥ 2 was more frequent in patients with polypharmacy (48% vs. 8%; p < 0.001). Polypharmacy was associated with lower odds of favourable outcome (adjusted odds ratio 0.50, 95% confidence interval 0.30-0.85; p = 0.0099), whilst the CCI score was not. Treatment with alteplase was associated with higher odds of favourable outcome in both groups, with no heterogeneity of treatment effect (test for interaction of treatment and polypharmacy, p = 0.29). CONCLUSION: In stroke patients, polypharmacy is associated with worse functional outcome after intravenous thrombolysis independent of comorbidities. However, polypharmacy does not interact with the beneficial effect of alteplase

Polypharmacy, functional outcome and treatment effect of intravenous alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Polypharmacy is an important challenge in clinical practice. Our aim was to determine the effect of polypharmacy on functional outcome and treatment effect of alteplase in acute ischaemic stroke. METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of the randomized, placebo-controlled WAKE-UP trial of magnetic resonance imaging guided intravenous alteplase in unknown onset stroke. Polypharmacy was defined as an intake of five or more medications at baseline. Comorbidities were assessed by the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). The primary efficacy variable was favourable outcome defined by a score of 0-1 on the modified Rankin Scale at 90 days. Logistic regression analysis was used to test for an association of polypharmacy with functional outcome, and for interaction of polypharmacy and the effect of thrombolysis. RESULTS: Polypharmacy was present in 133/503 (26%) patients. Patients with polypharmacy were older (mean age 70 vs. 64 years; p < 0.0001) and had a higher score on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale at baseline (median 7 vs. 5; p = 0.0007). A comorbidity load defined by a CCI score ≥ 2 was more frequent in patients with polypharmacy (48% vs. 8%; p < 0.001). Polypharmacy was associated with lower odds of favourable outcome (adjusted odds ratio 0.50, 95% confidence interval 0.30-0.85; p = 0.0099), whilst the CCI score was not. Treatment with alteplase was associated with higher odds of favourable outcome in both groups, with no heterogeneity of treatment effect (test for interaction of treatment and polypharmacy, p = 0.29). CONCLUSION: In stroke patients, polypharmacy is associated with worse functional outcome after intravenous thrombolysis independent of comorbidities. However, polypharmacy does not interact with the beneficial effect of alteplase.status: Published onlin