Organs of becoming : reading, editing and censoring the texts of M. Barnard Eldershaw's Tomorrow and Tomorrow and Tomorrow

This thesis, a study of the reading, editing and censoring of M. Barnard Eldershaw's Tomorrow and Tomorrow and Tomorrow, contains two key objectives. Firstly, it aims to demonstrate how the unusual structure and subject matter of the novel influenced its conflicting readings, its uneven reception and its tortuous editorial history. A utopian reading of the novel is offered as a useful method to explore the ambivalent messages in its contradictory and many-layered narrative. The novel's treatment of authorship and authority, already the subject of scholarly attention, is revisited: firstly in relation to material within the book itself and secondly in relation to Marjorie Barnard's claim to be the sole author of the novel. A close study of one of the extant typescripts throws this claim further into doubt. It is posited that the novel's publication history and censorship have been directly influenced by the way that Tomorrow lends itself to conflicting and diverse readings. In addition, public perception of the authorship of the novel has also affected its interpretations, and the literary reputations of Marjorie Barnard and Flora Eldershaw. A study of the reception history of the novel addresses the ideologies and assumptions underpinning the assessments of critics and readers, and speculates on the methodologies influencing the actions of the editors and censor of Tomorrow Secondly, this thesis aims to present and examine new manuscripts, correspondence and other documentation that came to light with the death of Marjorie Barnard's companion, Vera Murdoch. The material already archived in Barnard's papers at the Mitchell Library in NSW is crucial to this examination, particularly the typescript which has been understood to represent the censoring of the novel in 1944, and which formed the basis for the Virago edition of the book in 1983. In examining this typescript, it is argued that Virago's claim that the 1983 edition represents the full text of Tomorrow is misleading. Many emendations attributed to the censor were probably the work of editors or of the authors themselves. It is also demonstrated that the greater part of the Virago edition is a photostatted copy of the earlier published edition and is thus not a completely new edition. These contentions are supported by the new material, which includes a complete, revised typescript of Tomorrow. It is argued that this typescript was probably completed by Barnard in 1957, as part of a three-decades-long effort to get the novel republished. It is also posited that the manuscript in the Mitchell Library, hitherto seen as the most satisfactory example of final authorial intention, was assembled by Marjorie Barnard sometime after i 947 and was never intended to be used as a copytext. These findings further complicate the difficulties of conclusively locating the author of Tomorrow, and of finding an authoritative text. Thus, while the latter part of the thesis is not in itself a preparation for a scholarly edition, many of the issues provoked by a study of the different texts of Tomorrow are addressed by textual criticism usually associated with the preparation of scholarly editions. Authorial intention and notions of complete and authentic texts are questioned. A complex picture of Australian literary and publishing history emerges, that illuminates the many collaborative influences that have produced versions of Tomorrow to date, and suggests directions for the future publication of a new edition of the novel

Case Study Report: Supporting School-University Pathways for Refugee Students' Access and Participation in Tertiary Education

This report examines the barriers and challenges faced by refugee background students transitioning from Australian secondary schools to university

Report on the actions of the Digital Commons Policy Council in favour of the recognition of digital commons

The DCPC is an international think tank established in 2021. It advocates for initiatives seeking to protect and expand the digital commons and to use the digital commons to accelerate the transition to a more ecologically sustainable and fair society. It does so by producing evidence-based public reports on the digital commons and related topics, educational resources for primary and secondary schools, how-to guides to assist in the creation of commonly held resources and by making submissions and recommendations to government