21 research outputs found
Modulation of spinal excitability following neuromuscular electrical stimulation superimposed to voluntary contraction
Purpose. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) superimposed on voluntary muscle contraction has been recently
shown as an innovative training modality within sport and rehabilitation, but its effects on the neuromuscular system are
still unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate acute responses in spinal excitability, as measured by the Hoffmann
(H) reflex, and in maximal voluntary contraction (MVIC) following NMES superimposed to voluntary isometric
contractions (NMES+ISO) compared to passive NMES only and to voluntary isometric contractions only (ISO). Method.
Fifteen young adults were required to maintain an ankle plantar-flexor torque of 20% MVC for 20 repetitions during each
experimental condition (NMES+ISO, NMES and ISO). Surface electromyography was used to record peak-to-peak Hreflex and motor waves following percutaneous stimulation of the posterior tibial nerve in the dominant limb. An
isokinetic dynamometer was used to assess maximal voluntary contraction output of the ankle plantar flexor muscles.
Results. H-reflex amplitude was increased by 4.5% after the NMES+ISO condition (p < 0.05), while passive NMES and
ISO conditions showed a decrease by 7.8% (p < 0.05) and no change in reflex responses, respectively. There was no
change in amplitude of maximal motor wave and in MVIC torque during each experimental condition. Conclusion. The
reported facilitation of spinal excitability following NMES+ISO could be due to a combination of greater motor neuronal
and corticospinal excitability, thus suggesting that NMES superimposed onto isometric voluntary contractions may
provide a more effective neuromuscular stimulus and, hence, training modality compared to NMES alone
Status Update and Interim Results from the Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial-2 (ACST-2)
Objectives: ACST-2 is currently the largest trial ever conducted to compare carotid artery stenting (CAS) with carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in patients with severe asymptomatic carotid stenosis requiring revascularization. Methods: Patients are entered into ACST-2 when revascularization is felt to be clearly indicated, when CEA and CAS are both possible, but where there is substantial uncertainty as to which is most appropriate. Trial surgeons and interventionalists are expected to use their usual techniques and CE-approved devices. We report baseline characteristics and blinded combined interim results for 30-day mortality and major morbidity for 986 patients in the ongoing trial up to September 2012. Results: A total of 986 patients (687 men, 299 women), mean age 68.7 years (SD ± 8.1) were randomized equally to CEA or CAS. Most (96%) had ipsilateral stenosis of 70-99% (median 80%) with contralateral stenoses of 50-99% in 30% and contralateral occlusion in 8%. Patients were on appropriate medical treatment. For 691 patients undergoing intervention with at least 1-month follow-up and Rankin scoring at 6 months for any stroke, the overall serious cardiovascular event rate of periprocedural (within 30 days) disabling stroke, fatal myocardial infarction, and death at 30 days was 1.0%. Conclusions: Early ACST-2 results suggest contemporary carotid intervention for asymptomatic stenosis has a low risk of serious morbidity and mortality, on par with other recent trials. The trial continues to recruit, to monitor periprocedural events and all types of stroke, aiming to randomize up to 5,000 patients to determine any differential outcomes between interventions. Clinical trial: ISRCTN21144362. © 2013 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved