'Who do "they" cheer for?' Cricket, diaspora, hybridity and divided loyalties amongst British Asians

This article explores the relationship between British Asians' sense of nationhood, citizenship, ethnicity and some of their manifestations in relation to sports fandom: specifically in terms of how cricket is used as a means of articulating diasporic British Asian identities. Norman Tebbit's 'cricket test' is at the forefront of this article to tease out the complexities of being British Asian in terms of supporting the English national cricket team. The first part of the article locates Tebbit's 'cricket test' within the wider discourse of multiculturalism. The analysis then moves to focus on the discourse of sports fandom and the concept of 'home team advantage' arguing that sports venues represent significant sites for nationalist and cultural expression due to their connection with national history. The article highlights how supporting 'Anyone but England', thereby rejecting ethnically exclusive notions of 'Englishness' and 'Britishness', continues to be a definer of British Asians' cultural identities. The final section situates these trends within the discourse of hybridity and argues that sporting allegiances are often separate from considerations of national identity and citizenship. Rather than placing British Asians in an either/or situation, viewing British 'Asianness' in hybrid terms enables them to celebrate their traditions and histories, whilst also being proud of their British citizenship. © The Author(s) 2011

Representations of sport in the revolutionary socialist press in Britain, 1988–2012

This paper considers how sport presents a dualism to those on the far left of the political spectrum. A long-standing, passionate debate has existed on the contradictory role played by sport, polarised between those who reject it as a bourgeois capitalist plague and those who argue for its reclamation and reformation. A case study is offered of a political party that has consistently used revolutionary Marxism as the basis for its activity and how this party, the largest in Britain, addresses sport in its publications. The study draws on empirical data to illustrate this debate by reporting findings from three socialist publications. When sport did feature it was often in relation to high profile sporting events with a critical tone adopted and typically focused on issues of commodification, exploitation and alienation of athletes and supporters. However, readers’ letters, printed in the same publications, revealed how this interpretation was not universally accepted, thus illustrating the contradictory nature of sport for those on the far left

A sociological dilemma: race, segregation, and US sociology

US sociology has been historically segregated in that, at least until the 1960s, there were two distinct institutionally organized traditions of sociological thought – one black and one white. For the most part, however, dominant historiographies have been silent on that segregation and, at best, reproduce it when addressing the US sociological tradition. This is evident in the rarity with which scholars such as WEB Du Bois, E Franklin Frazier, Oliver Cromwell Cox, or other ‘African American Pioneers of Sociology’, as Saint-Arnaud calls them, are presented as core sociological voices within histories of the discipline. This article addresses the absence of African American sociologists from the US sociological canon and, further, discusses the implications of this absence for our understanding of core sociological concepts. With regard to the latter, the article focuses in particular on the debates around equality and emancipation and discusses the ways in which our understanding of these concepts could be extended by taking into account the work of African American sociologists and their different interpretations of core themes

A bubble in the vein: suicide, community, and the rejection of neoliberalism in Hanya Yanagihara's A little life and Miriam Toews's All my puny sorrows

This chapter explores how Marlon James’ A Brief History of Seven Killings (2014) and Paulo Lins’ Cidade de Deus (City of God 1997) speak to the contemporary crisis in the neoliberal regime of accumulation, as well as to the initial struggle to impose neoliberalism in the global South. A Brief History registers the fallout from the turmoil in Jamaica in the 1970s, when Michael Manley’s efforts to pursue a path of democratic socialism were undermined by party-political gang warfare, economic crisis, and the impact of US imperialism. City of God, meanwhile, focuses primarily on the closed world of the titular favela, located on the western edge of Rio de Janeiro. Despite this limited compass, the “inexorable weight of contemporary history makes itself felt” in the novel’s representation of the desperate lives of its protagonists (Schwarz, Two Girls: And Other Essays. London: Verso, 2012: 227). Spanning the period from the 1960s to the early 1980s, the narrative is shadowed by the presence of the dictatorship in Brazil and by the unfolding logic of the world-economy. Through their formal logics and stylistic mannerisms, City of God and A Brief History rehearse the possibilities for both reactionary and progressive class realignments in the wake of hegemonic dissolution. The precise nature of these possibilities, however, is differentiated in the two novels by the specific social contexts and historical moments to which they respond

Slavery and the Revival of Anti-slavery Activism

This chapter sets out the volumes critical approach to the dominant discourse on modern slavery and its impulse to question the assumptions and the politics behind that discourse. It explores the limits of the modern slavery rhetoric for understanding the complicated logics of agency, freedom and belonging, and of past, present and future, for those who are constituted as slaves. Document type: Part of book or chapter of boo