Neurobehavioral Mechanisms of Temporal Processing Deficits in Parkinson's Disease

Parkinson's disease (PD) disrupts temporal processing, but the neuronal sources of deficits and their response to dopamine (DA) therapy are not understood. Though the striatum and DA transmission are thought to be essential for timekeeping, potential working memory (WM) and executive problems could also disrupt timing.The present study addressed these issues by testing controls and PD volunteers 'on' and 'off' DA therapy as they underwent fMRI while performing a time-perception task. To distinguish systems associated with abnormalities in temporal and non-temporal processes, we separated brain activity during encoding and decision-making phases of a trial. Whereas both phases involved timekeeping, the encoding and decision phases emphasized WM and executive processes, respectively. The methods enabled exploration of both the amplitude and temporal dynamics of neural activity. First, we found that time-perception deficits were associated with striatal, cortical, and cerebellar dysfunction. Unlike studies of timed movement, our results could not be attributed to traditional roles of the striatum and cerebellum in movement. Second, for the first time we identified temporal and non-temporal sources of impaired time perception. Striatal dysfunction was found during both phases consistent with its role in timekeeping. Activation was also abnormal in a WM network (middle-frontal and parietal cortex, lateral cerebellum) during encoding and a network that modulates executive and memory functions (parahippocampus, posterior cingulate) during decision making. Third, hypoactivation typified neuronal dysfunction in PD, but was sometimes characterized by abnormal temporal dynamics (e.g., lagged, prolonged) that were not due to longer response times. Finally, DA therapy did not alleviate timing deficits.Our findings indicate that impaired timing in PD arises from nigrostriatal and mesocortical dysfunction in systems that mediate temporal and non-temporal control-processes. However, time perception impairments were not improved by DA treatment, likely due to inadequate restoration of neuronal activity and perhaps corticostriatal effective-connectivity

From preparation to online control: reappraisal of neural circuitry mediating internally generated and externally guided actions.

Action plans internally generated (IG) from memory are thought to be regulated by the supplementary motor area (SMA), whereas plans externally guided (EG) online using sensory cues are believed to be controlled by the premotor cortex. This theory was investigated in an event-related fMRI study that separated the time course of activation before and during movement to distinguish advance planning from online control. In contrast to prevailing theory, the SMA was not more important for online control of IG actions. EG movement was distinguished from IG movement by greater activation in a more distributed right hemisphere parietal-frontal network than previously reported. Comparisons between premovement and movement periods showed that frontostriatal networks are central for preparing actions before movement onset. However, unlike cortical and cerebellar regions, the basal ganglia exhibited planning-related activity before, but not during, movement. These findings indicate that the basal ganglia mediate planning and online control processes in different ways and suggest a specific role for the striatum in internally planning sequences of actions before they are implemented

Grasping reveals visual misjudgements of shape

Contains fulltext : 55084.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access)Many of our daily activities are supported by behavioural goals that guide the selection of actions, which allow us to reach these goals effectively. Goals are considered to be important for action observation since they allow the observer to copy the goal of the action without the need to use the exact same means. The importance of being able to use different action means becomes evident when the observer and observed actor have different bodies (robots and humans) or bodily measurements (parents and children), or when the environments of actor and observer differ substantially (when an obstacle is present or absent in either environment). A selective focus on the action goals instead of the action means furthermore circumvents the need to consider the vantage point of the actor, which is consistent with recent findings that people prefer to represent the actions of others from their own individual perspective. In this paper, we use a computational approach to investigate how knowledge about action goals and means are used in action observation. We hypothesise that in action observation human agents are primarily interested in identifying the goals of the observed actor’s behaviour. Behavioural cues (e.g. the way an object is grasped) may help to disambiguate the goal of the actor (e.g. whether a cup is grasped for drinking or handing it over). Recent advances in cognitive neuroscience are cited in support of the model’s architecture.13 p

Motor and perceptual timing in Parkinson's Disease

Neuroimaging has been a powerful tool for understanding the neural architecture of interval timing. However, identifying the critical brain regions engaged in timing was initially driven by investigation of human patients and animals. This chapter draws on the important contribution that the study of patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) has made in identifying the basal ganglia as a key component of motor and perceptual timing. The chapter initially describes the experimental tasks that have been critical in PD (and non-PD) timing research before systematically discussing the results from behavioural studies. This is followed by a critique of neuroimaging studies that have given insight into the pattern of neural activity during motor and perceptual timing in PD. Finally, discussion of the effects of medical and surgical treatment on timing in PD enables further evaluation of the role of dopamine in interval timing