Hyperfractionated total body irradiation for T-depleted HLA identical bone marrow transplants.

Twenty patients suffering from malignant hemopathies (mean age 31.7 years) were given hyperfractionated total body irradiation (TBI) (120 cGy/3 fractions per day: total dose = 1440 cGy/4 days) as conditioning for T-depleted HLA identical allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. At an average of 12 months (range of 4.5-22 months) follow-up there were two cases of early death and two cases (11%) of rejection. There were no cases of acute or chronic graft versus host disease (GVHD) nor cases of interstitial pneumonitis. The average time for durable engraftment was 22 days. Disease-free survival at 12 months was 65%. To improve the results and further reduce the percent of rejection, the authors propose intensifying the immunosuppressive conditioning by increasing the cyclophosphamide dose and that of TBI so that a total dose of 1560 cGy is reached

Interstitial pneumonitis after hyperfractionated total body irradiation in HLA-matched T-depleted bone marrow transplantation.

Interstitial pneumonia is one of the major causes of morbidity and mortality after bone-marrow transplantation. We here report a series of 58 patients suffering from hematological malignancies who received HLA-matched T-lymphocyte depleted bone-marrow transplants between July 1985 and January 1990. Interstitial pneumonia occurred in 7/58 patients (12%) and was fatal in six. Three different pre-bone-marrow transplantation conditioning regimens were employed. Total body irradiation was delivered according to a hyperfractionated scheme of 12 fractions given three per day 5 hr apart for 4 days. Twenty-three patients received 36 mg/Kg procarbazine, 1275 UL/Kg antithymocite globulin, 14.4 Gy hyperfractionated total body irradiation and 120 mg/Kg cyclophosphamide. Only one patient developed interstitial pneumonia, but two rejected the graft and 10 relapsed. As a consequence, the total hyperfractionated scheme was increased to 15,6 Gy, cyclophosphamide to 200 mg/Kg, antithymocite globulin to 3400 UL/Kg and procarbazine eliminated. There were three cases of interstitial pneumonia, no rejection and four relapses in the 17 patients who received this regimen. In the last 18 patients hyperfractionated total body irradiation was reduced to 15 Gy, cyclophosphamide to 100 mg/Kg, and 10 mg/Kg of the myeloablative agent thiothepa added to enhance the cytoreductive effect without significantly increasing extramedullary toxicity. Three cases of interstitial pneumonia, one relapse but no rejection were recorded. Our results demonstrate that the absence of graft-versus-host disease due to T-cell depletion, and radio-chemotherapy doses and schedules used for the conditioning regimen each contributed to reducing the risk of interstitial pneumonitis. Hyperfractionated total body irradiation therefore, seems to play an important role in lowering the incidence of this complication

Lung damage following bone marrow transplantation after hyperfractionated total body irradiation.

From July 1985 to December 1989, 72 evaluable patients aged between 6 and 51 (median age 27 years) suffering from haematological malignancies received an allogeneic bone marrow transplant (BMT) depleted of T-lymphocytes to reduce the risk of graft-versus-host-disease (GvHD); 57 were matched and 15 mismatched. Three different conditioning regimens were used in an effort to enhance cytoreduction without increase extramedullary toxicity. Mismatched patients were treated with more immunosuppressive regimens. Total body irradiation (TBI) was given in three doses per day, 5 h apart, over 4 days for a total of 12 fractions. The dose to the lungs was 14.4, 15.6 and 9 Gy according to the conditioning regimen. The incidence of interstitial pneumonia (IP) was 12.3% in matched and 46.7% in mismatched patients. Our results seem to indicate that lung toxicity is correlated with the intensity of the conditioning regimen, the stage of disease and, in mismatched patients, with the degree of human leucocyte antigen (HLA) disparity and the poor post-BMT reconstitution, rather than the radiotherapy dose delivered to the lungs. On the contrary, the hyperfractionated scheme adopted, the absence of GvHD and, perhaps, the post-TBI administration of cyclophosphamide all seem to have contributed to the low incidence of IP in our matched patients

Be Cool! Aesthetic Imperatives and Social Practices

We are pleased to present the special issue of ZMJ dedicated to the International Zonemoda Conference 2019 \u201cBe cool! Aesthetic Imperatives and Social Practices\u201d which was held in Rimini last May. The Conference was organized by Gioia Laura Iannilli, Stefano Marino and Giovanni Matteucci for the International Research Center \u201cCulture Fashion Communication\u201d of the Department for Life Quality Studies. The special issue contains a selection of the papers presented during the Conference, edited by Gioia Laura Iannilli and Stefano Marino. Being cool ain\u2019t easy: this is all the more true today, when current reality has undergone a process of widespread aestheticization. In general, by \u201caestheticization\u201d we refer here to the fact that in the last decades the aesthetic has apparently undergone an incredible process of extension and dissemination, and has fundamentally become an (often pressing) \u201cimperative\u201d while playing a relevant role in social practices, inasmuch as appearances and the expression of taste preferences have become determining factors for them. In this framework fashion surely plays a pivotal role: in fact, not only is fashion intrinsically connoted by the priority of appearances and taste over other features of experience, but it also does so while intertwining the aesthetic and the social implications it has. And this is presumably why the imperative \u201cBe Cool!\u201d is supposed to work on both levels and has such a deep impact on our reality. On the one hand, to be cool means having certain aesthetic features, inspiring certain behaviors and being connected to certain tastes, while on the other hand to be cool also means being able to make the latter convey towards good everyday practices

Radiation-induced emesis: A prospective observational multicenter Italian trial

Purpose: A prospective observational multicenter trial was carried out to assess the incidence, pattern, and prognostic factors of radiation-induced emesis (RTE), and evaluate the use of antiemetic drugs in radiation oncology clinical practice. Methods and Materials: Fifty-one Italian radiation oncology centers took part in this trial. The accrual lasted 2 consecutive weeks, only patients starting radiotherapy in this period were enrolled. Exclusion criteria were age under 18 years, and concomitant chemotherapy. Evaluation was based on diary cards filled in daily by patients during radiotherapy and I week after stopping it. Diary cards recorded the intensity of nausea and any episode of vomiting and retching. Prophylactic and symptomatic antiemetic drug prescriptions were also registered. Results: Nine hundred thirty-four patients entered the trial, and 914 were evaluable. Irradiated sites were: breast in 211 patients, pelvis in 210 patients, head and neck in 136 patients, thorax in 129 patients, brain in 52 patients, upper abdomen in 42 patients, skin and/or extremities in 37 patients, and other sites in 97 patients. Vomiting and nausea occurred in 17.1% and 37.3% of patients, respectively, and 38.7% patients had both vomiting and nausea. At multifactorial analysis, the only patient-related risk factor that was statistically significant was represented by previous experience with cancer chemotherapy. Moreover, two radiotherapy (RT)-related factors were significant risk factors for RIE, the irradiated site and field size. In fact, a statistically significant higher percentage of RIE was registered in upper abdomen RT and RT fields > 400 cm(2). Although nonstatistically significant, patients receiving RT to the thorax and head and neck presented a higher incidence of RIE. Only a minority (14%) of patients receiving RT were given an antiemetic drug, and the prescriptions were more often symptomatic than prophylactic (9% vs. 5%, respectively). Different compounds and a wide range of doses and schedules were used; however, there is some evidence from our data that in spite of antiemetic prophylaxis, 46% of patients had vomiting, and 58% had nausea. The majority (93%) of the prophylactic group received oral 5-hydroxytriptamine receptor (5-HT3) antagonist (8 mg/day, 7 days/week). In the symptomatic group, 54% and 41% patients received 5-HT3 antagonists and metoclopramide, respectively. At multivariate analysis, no patient- or PT-related risk factor for RIE was found to influence significantly the prophylactic or symptomatic use of antiemetics. Conclusion: Our study provided useful data on epidemiology and characteristics of RIE. Previous chemotherapy, field size, and irradiated site (upper abdomen) were the only significant prognostic factors of RIE. A remarkable incidence of RIE was found in patients submitted to thoracic and head and neck RT. With this background of knowledge, it will be possible to better plan further studies on this important problem. Moreover, the low rate of antiemetics use and the wide variety of doses and schedules employed suggest the need to reinforce the "evidence based" approach to identify the best antiemetic approach to RIE. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Inc