Postprocedure Anticoagulation in Patients With Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Objectives: This study sought to assess the association between postprocedural anticoagulation (PPAC) use and several clinical outcomes. Background: PPAC after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) may prevent recurrent ischemic events but may increase the risk of bleeding. No consensus has been reached on PPAC use. Methods: Using data from the Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China–Acute Coronary Syndrome registry, conducted between 2014 and 2019, we stratified all STEMI patients who underwent pPCI according to the use of PPAC or not. Inverse probability of treatment weighting and a Cox proportional hazards model with hospital as random effect were used to analyze differences in in-hospital clinical outcomes: the primary efficacy endpoint was mortality and the primary safety endpoint was major bleeding. Results: Of 34,826 evaluable patients, 26,272 (75.4%) were treated with PPAC and were on average younger, more stable at admission with lower bleeding risk score, more likely to have comorbidities and multivessel disease, and more often treated within 12 hours of symptom onset than those without PPAC. After inverse probability of treatment weighting adjustment for baseline differences, PPAC was associated with significantly reduced risk of in-hospital mortality (0.9% vs 1.8%; HR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.43-0.89; P < 0.001) and a nonsignificant difference in risk of in-hospital major bleeding (2.5% vs 2.2%; HR: 1.05; 95% CI: 0.83-1.32; P = 0.14). Conclusions: PPAC in STEMI patients after pPCI was associated with reduced mortality without increasing major bleeding complications. Dedicated randomized trials with contemporary STEMI management are needed to confirm these findings

Risk Factors for In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Background: In-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) is one of the most deleterious complications of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Objectives: We systematically analyzed the clinical characteristics of STEMI patients with IHCA, as well as predictors and treatments associated with risk of IHCA, using a nationwide database. Methods: In the CCC-ACS (Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China-Acute Coronary Syndrome) project (2014-2019), we stratified patients presenting with STEMI within 24 hours after symptom onset according to IHCA or no IHCA during the index hospitalization. We analyzed patients’ clinical characteristics, mortality, and independent correlates of IHCA. Results: Of 40,670 STEMI patients, 2.2% (95% CI: 2.1%-2.4%) experienced IHCA. Among IHCA patients, the in-hospital mortality was 53.0% (95% CI: 49.7%-56.3%). IHCA represents 55.0% (95% CI: 51.6%-58.4%) of inpatient deaths. Age ≥75 years, female, nonsmoker, prior diabetes mellitus, prior renal failure, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, heart rate >100 beats/min, systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg, and Killip IV were identified as predictors of IHCA. IHCA patients were less likely to receive β-blockers and ticagrelor during the first 24 hours after first medical contact and were less likely to undergo primary percutaneous coronary intervention. After adjustment, primary percutaneous coronary intervention (adjusted HR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.71-0.95), β-blockers (adjusted HR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.47-0.86), and ticagrelor (adjusted HR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.42-0.76) were associated with a reduced risk of IHCA. Conclusions: IHCA is rare in STEMI but is associated with high mortality. Multiple modifiable and unmodifiable factors are associated with its occurrence, suggesting that early intervention and rational drug treatment may improve its prognosis. (CCC Project- Acute Coronary Syndrome; NCT02306616

Prehospital statin use and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels at admission in acute coronary syndrome patients with history of myocardial infarction or revascularization: Findings from the Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China (CCC) project

Background: Lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) by statins is a key strategy for secondary prevention of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, few studies have examined prehospital statin use and admission LDL-C levels in ACS patients with history of myocardial infarction (MI) or revascularization. This study aimed to assess use of prehospital statins and LDL-C levels at admission in ACS patients with history of MI or revascularization. Methods: Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China project was a nationwide registry, with 192 participating hospitals reporting details of clinical information of ACS patients from November 2014. By May 2018, 80,282 patients with ACS were included. LDL-C levels were obtained from the initial admission lipid testing. Results: Of the 80,282 ACS patients, 6,523 with a history of MI or revascularization were enrolled. Among them, 50.8% were receiving lipid-lowering therapy before hospitalization (statin monotherapy in 98.4%, combination in 1.2%). A total of 30.1% of patients had LDL-C &lt; 70 mg/dL at admission. In patients receiving prehospital statins, 36.1% had LDL-C &lt; 70 mg/dL compared to 24.0% without prehospital statins (P &lt;.001). At discharge, 91.8% of patients were treated with statin monotherapy, 90.7% at moderate doses irrespective of prehospital statin use and LDL-C levels at admission. Conclusions: Among ACS patients with history of MI or revascularization, half were not being treated with statin therapy prior to admission, and most had not attained LDL-C &lt; 70 mg/dL despite prehospital statin use. There is an important opportunity to provide intensive statin or combination lipid-lowering therapy to these very high risk patients

Performance on management strategies with Class I Recommendation and A Level of Evidence among hospitalized patients with non–ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome in China: Findings from the Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China–Acute Coronary Syndrome (CCC-ACS) project

Background: This study aimed to examine hospital performance on evidence-based management strategies for non–ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) and variations across hospitals. Methods: Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China (CCC)-ACS project is an ongoing registry and quality improvement project, with 150 tertiary hospitals recruited across China. We examined hospital performance on nine management strategies (Class I Recommendations with A Level of Evidence) based on established guidelines. We also evaluated the proportion of patients receiving defect-free care, which was defined as the care that included all the required management strategies for which the patient was eligible. The hospital-level variations in the performance were examined. Results: From 2014 to 2018, 28,170 NSTE-ACS patients were included. Overall, 16% of patients received defect-free care. Higher-performing metrics were statin at discharge (93%), cardiac troponin measurement (92%), dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) within 24 hours (90%), and DAPT at discharge (85%). These were followed by metrics of β-blocker at discharge (69%), angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker (ACEI/ARB) at discharge (59%), and risk stratification (56%). Lower-performing metrics were smoking cessation counseling (35%) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) within recommended times (33%). The proportion of patients receiving defect-free care substantially varied across hospitals, ranging from 0% to 58% (Median (interquartile range):12% (7%–21%)). There were large variations across hospitals in performance on risk stratification, smoking cessation counseling, PCI within recommended times, ACEI/ARB at discharge and β-blocker at discharge. Conclusions: About one in six NSTE-ACS patients received defect-free care, and the performance varied across hospitals

Prevalence and in-hospital outcomes of diabetes among patients with acute coronary syndrome in China: findings from the Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China-Acute Coronary Syndrome Project

Abstract Background Guidelines have classified patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and diabetes as a special population, with specific sections presented for the management of these patients considering their extremely high risk. However, in China up-to-date information is lacking regarding the burden of diabetes in patients with ACS and the potential impact of diabetes status on the in-hospital outcomes of these patients. This study aims to provide updated estimation for the burden of diabetes in patients with ACS in China and to evaluate whether diabetes is still associated with excess risks of early mortality and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) for ACS patients. Methods The Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China-ACS Project was a collaborative study of the American Heart Association and the Chinese Society of Cardiology. A total of 63,450 inpatients with a definitive diagnosis of ACS were included. Prevalence of diabetes was evaluated in the overall study population and subgroups. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to examine the association between diabetes and in-hospital outcomes, and a propensity-score-matched analysis was further conducted. Results Among these ACS patients, 23,880 (37.6%) had diabetes/possible diabetes. Both STEMI and NSTE-ACS patients had a high prevalence of diabetes/possible diabetes (36.8% versus 39.0%). The prevalence of diabetes/possible diabetes was higher in women (45.0% versus 35.2%, p < 0.001). Even in patients younger than 45 years, 26.9% had diabetes/possible diabetes. While receiving comparable treatments for ACS, diabetes/possible diabetes was associated with a twofold higher risk of all-cause death (adjusted odds ratio 2.04 [95% confidence interval 1.78–2.33]) and a 1.5-fold higher risk of MACCE (adjusted odds ratio 1.54 [95% confidence interval 1.39–1.72]). Conclusions Diabetes was highly prevalent in patients with ACS in China. Considerable excess risks for early mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events were found in these patients. Trial registration NCT02306616. Registered December 3, 201

Proton Pump Inhibitors and In-Hospital Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Receiving Dual Antiplatelet Therapy

Objective: To evaluate the association between proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use and in-hospital gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) taking dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). Patients and Methods: This study is based on the Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China-ACS project, an ongoing collaborative registry and quality improvement project of the American Heart Association and the Chinese Society of Cardiology. A total of 25,567 patients with ACS taking DAPT from 172 hospitals from July 1, 2017, through December 31, 2018, were included. Multivariable Cox regression and propensity score–matched analyses were used to evaluate the association between PPI use and in-hospital GI bleeding. Results: Of these patients with ACS, 63.9% (n=16,332) were prescribed PPIs within 24 hours of admission. Patients using PPIs had a higher rate of GI bleeding compared with those not using PPIs (1.0% vs 0.5%; P&lt;.001). In the multivariable Cox regression analysis, early PPI use was associated with a 58% higher risk of GI bleeding (hazard ratio, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.15 to 2.18; P=.005). Further propensity score matching attenuated the association but still showed that patients using PPIs had a higher rate of GI bleeding (0.8% vs 0.6%; P=.04). Conclusion: In China, PPIs are widely used within 24 hours of admission in patients with ACS taking DAPT. An increased risk of GI bleeding is observed in inpatients with early PPI use. Randomized trials on early use of PPIs in patients with ACS receiving DAPT are warranted. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02306616

A Risk Stratification Scheme for In-Hospital Cardiogenic Shock in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction

Objective: Cardiogenic shock (CS) is the leading cause of death in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) despite advances in care. This study aims to derive and validate a risk score for in-hospital development of CS in patients with AMI. Methods: In this study, we used the Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China–Acute Coronary Syndrome (CCC–ACS) registry of 76,807 patients for model development and internal validation. These patients came from 158 tertiary hospitals and 82 secondary hospitals between 2014 and 2019, presenting AMI without CS upon admission. The eligible patients with AMI were randomly assigned to derivation (n = 53,790) and internal validation (n = 23,017) cohorts. Another cohort of 2,205 patients with AMI between 2014 and 2016 was used for external validation. Based on the identified predictors for in-hospital CS, a new point-based CS risk scheme, referred to as the CCC–ACS CS score, was developed and validated. Results: A total of 866 (1.1%) and 39 (1.8%) patients subsequently developed in-hospital CS in the CCC–ACS project and external validation cohort, respectively. The CCC–ACS CS score consists of seven variables, including age, acute heart failure upon admission, systolic blood pressure upon admission, heart rate, initial serum creatine kinase-MB level, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and mechanical complications. The area under the curve for in-hospital development of CS was 0.73, 0.71, and 0.85 in the derivation, internal validation and external validation cohorts, respectively. Conclusion: This newly developed CCC–ACS CS score can quantify the risk of in-hospital CS for patients with AMI, which may help in clinical decision making. Clinical Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT02306616

The Level of Remnant Cholesterol and Implications for Lipid-Lowering Strategy in Hospitalized Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome in China: Findings from the Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China—Acute Coronary Syndrome Project

Elevated remnant cholesterol is associated with an increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). We aimed to evaluate the concentrations and general distribution of remnant cholesterol at admission in patients hospitalized for acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and those in patients who reached the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) target or non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) target. Patients with ACS who were enrolled in the Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China—ACS project from 2014 to 2019 were included. Elevated remnant cholesterol concentrations were defined as ≥1.0 mmol/L. Among 94,869 patients, the median (interquartile range) remnant cholesterol concentration at admission was 0.6 mmol/L (0.4–0.9 mmol/L) and 19.2% had elevated remnant cholesterol concentrations. Among patients with LDL-C concentrations < 1.4 mmol/L, 24.4% had elevated remnant cholesterol concentrations, while the proportion was 13.3% among patients with LDL-C concentrations between 1.4 and 1.7 mmol/L. Among patients with non-HDL-C concentrations < 2.6 mmol/L, 2.9% had elevated remnant cholesterol concentrations but 79.6% had LDL-C concentrations ≥ 1.4 mmol/L. Even among patients with LDL-C < 1.4 mmol/L and non-HDL-C < 2.6 mmol/L, 10.9% had elevated remnant cholesterol. In conclusion, one fifth of patients with ACS have elevated remnant cholesterol concentrations at admission. Elevated remnant cholesterol concentrations are present in patients with LDL-C or/and non-HDL-C concentrations within the target, which represents an unmet need to add remnant cholesterol as a target for the secondary prevention of ASCVD

Association between P2Y12 inhibitor reloading and in-hospital outcomes for patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome already on chronic P2Y12 receptor inhibitors therapy in China: findings from the CCC–ACS (improving care for cardiovascular disease in China-acute coronary syndrome) project

Abstract Background The association between P2Y12 receptor inhibitors reloading and in-hospital outcomes in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS) patients who were on chronic P2Y12 receptor inhibitors therapy remained underdetermined. Methods The Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China–Acute Coronary Syndrome (CCC–ACS project) is a national registry active from November 2014 to December 2019. 4790 NSTEACS patients on chronic P2Y12 receptor inhibitors therapy were included. Cox proportional hazard models, Kaplan–Meier curves, and subgroup analyses were conducted. Results The NSTEACS patients who received reloading of P2Y12 receptor inhibitors were younger and had fewer comorbid conditions. The reloading group had a lower risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (0.51% vs. 1.43%, P = 0.007), and all-cause death (0.36% vs. 0.99%, P = 0.028), the risks of myocardial infarction and major bleeding were not significantly different between patients with and without reloading. In survival analysis, a lower cumulative risk of MACE could be identified (Log-rank test, P = 0.007) in reloading group. In the unadjusted Cox model, reloading P2Y12 receptor inhibitors was associated with a decreased risk of MACE [HR, 0.35; 95% CI 0.16–0.78; (P = 0.010)] and all-cause death [HR, 0.37; 95% CI 0.14–0.94; (P = 0.036)]. Reloading of P2Y12 receptor inhibitors was associated with a decreased risk of MACE in most of the subgroups. Conclusions In NSTEACS patients already taking P2Y12 receptor inhibitors, we observed a decreased risk of in-hospital MACEs and all-cause mortality and did not observe an increased risk of major bleeding, with reloading. The differential profile in the two groups might influence this association and further studies are warranted. Clinical trial registration: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov (Unique identifier: NCT02306616, date of first registration: 03/12/2014