5,256 research outputs found

    Search for XYZXYZ states in Λb\Lambda_b decays at the LHCb

    Get PDF
    We consider X(3872)X(3872) and Y(4140)Y(4140) as the vector tetraquark states of Xc0≡ccˉuuˉ(ddˉ)X_c^0\equiv c\bar c u\bar u(d\bar d) and ccˉssˉc\bar c s\bar s, respectively. By connecting Λb→Xc0Λ\Lambda_b\to X_c^0\Lambda to B−→Xc0K−B^-\to X_c^0 K^-, we predict that the branching ratios of Λb→Λ(X(3872)0→)J/ψπ+π−\Lambda_b\to \Lambda(X(3872)^0\to) J/\psi \pi^+\pi^- and Λb→Λ(Y(4140)→)J/ψϕ\Lambda_b\to \Lambda(Y(4140)\to) J/\psi \phi are (5.2±1.8)×10−6(5.2\pm 1.8)\times 10^{-6} and (4.7±2.6)×10−6(4.7\pm 2.6)\times 10^{-6}, which are accessible to the experiments at the LHCb, respectively. The measurements of these Λb\Lambda_b modes would be the first experimental evidences for the XYZXYZ states in baryonic decays.Comment: 7 pages, 1 figure

    Radiative Baryonic BB Decays

    Get PDF
    We study the structure-dependent contributions to the radiative baryonic BB decays of B→BBˉ′γB \to {\bf B}{\bf \bar B'}\gamma in the standard model. We show that the decay branching ratios of Br(B→BBˉ′γ)Br(B \to {\bf B}{\bf \bar B'}\gamma) are O(10−7)O(10^{-7}), which are larger than the estimated values of O(10−9)O(10^{-9}) induced from inner bremsstrahlung effects of the corresponding two-body modes. In particular, we find that Br(B−→Λpˉγ)Br(B^- \to \Lambda \bar p \gamma) is around 1×10−61 \times 10^{-6}, which is close to the pole model estimation but smaller than the experimental measurement from BELLE.Comment: 11 pages, 2 figures, Revtex4, new fitting is include

    Pentaquarks from intrinsic charms in Λb\Lambda_b decays

    Get PDF
    We study the three-body Λb\Lambda_b decays of Λb→J/ψpM\Lambda_b\to J/\psi pM with M=K−M=K^- and π−\pi^-. The two new states Pc1≡Pc(4380)+{\cal P}_{c1}\equiv {\cal P}_c(4380)^+ and Pc2≡Pc(4450)+{\cal P}_{c2}\equiv {\cal P}_c(4450)^+ observed recently as the resonances in the J/ψpJ/\psi p invariant mass spectrum of Λb→J/ψpK−\Lambda_b\to J/\psi p K^- can be identified to consist of five quarks, uudccˉuudc\bar c, being consistent with the existence of the pentaquark states. We argue that, in the doubly charmful Λb\Lambda_b decays of Λb→J/ψpK−\Lambda_b\to J/\psi pK^- through b→ccˉsb\to c\bar c s, apart from those through the non-resonant Λb→pK−\Lambda_b\to pK^- and resonant Λb→Λ∗→pK−\Lambda_b\to \Lambda^*\to pK^- transitions, the third contribution with the non-factorizable effects is not the dominant part for the resonant Λb→K−Pc1,c2,Pc1,c2→J/ψp\Lambda_b\to K^-{\cal P}_{c1,c2}, {\cal P}_{c1,c2}\to J/\psi p processes, such that we propose that the Pc1,c2{\cal P}_{c1,c2} productions are mainly from the charmless Λb\Lambda_b decays through b→uˉusb\to \bar u u s, in which the ccˉc\bar c content in Pc1,c2{\cal P}_{c1,c2} arises from the intrinsic charms within the Λb\Lambda_b baryon. We hence predict the observables related to the branching ratios and the direct CP violating asymmetries to be B(Λb→π−(Pc1,c2→)J/ψp)/B(Λb→K−(Pc1,c2→)J/ψp)=0.8±0.1{\cal B}(\Lambda_b\to \pi^-({\cal P}_{c1,c2}\to) J/\psi p)/{\cal B}(\Lambda_b\to K^-({\cal P}_{c1,c2}\to) J/\psi p)=0.8\pm 0.1, ACP(Λb→π−(Pc1,c2→)J/ψp)=(−3.9±0.2)%{\cal A}_{CP}(\Lambda_b\to \pi^-({\cal P}_{c1,c2}\to)J/\psi p)=(-3.9\pm 0.2)\%, and ACP(Λb→K−(Pc1,c2→)J/ψp)=(5.8±0.2)%{\cal A}_{CP}(\Lambda_b\to K^-({\cal P}_{c1,c2}\to)J/\psi p)=(5.8\pm 0.2)\%, which can alleviate the inconsistency between the theoretical expectations from the three contributions in the doubly charmful Λb\Lambda_b decays and the observed data.Comment: 10 pages, 2 figures, revised version accepted by PL

    Identifying Glueball at 3.02 GeV in Baryonic BB Decays

    Full text link
    We examine the nature of the unknown enhancement around 3 GeV observed by the BABAR collaboration in the mppˉm_{p\bar p} spectrum of the Bˉ0→ppˉD0\bar B^0\to p\bar p D^0 decay. Suspecting that the peak is a resonance, which can be neither identified as a charmonium state, such as ηc\eta_c or J/ψJ/\psi, nor classified as one of the light-flavor mesons, we conclude that it corresponds to a glueball fitted as X(3020) with (mX,  ΓX)=(3020±8,  107±30)  MeV(m_X,\;\Gamma_X)=(3020\pm 8,\; 107\pm 30)\;\text{MeV}, which could be the first glueball state above 3 GeV. This state also appears in the mppˉm_{p\bar p} spectrum of the Bˉ0→ppˉD∗0\bar B^0\to p\bar p D^{*0} decay.Comment: 11 pages, 2 figure, title changed, revised version accepted by PL

    Determinations of ∣Vcb∣|V_{cb}| and ∣Vub∣|V_{ub}| from baryonic Λb\Lambda_b decays

    Full text link
    We extract the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa matrix element VcbV_{cb} from the exclusive decays of Λb→Λcℓνˉℓ\Lambda_b\to \Lambda_c\ell\bar \nu_\ell and Λb→ΛcM(c)\Lambda_b\to \Lambda_c M_{(c)} with M=(π−,K−)M=(\pi^-,K^-) and Mc=(D−,Ds−)M_c=(D^-,D^-_s), where the branching ratios of Λb→ΛM(c)\Lambda_b\to \Lambda M_{(c)} measured with high precisions have not been used in the previous studies. Explicitly, we find ∣Vcb∣=(44.0±3.5)×10−3|V_{cb}|=(44.0\pm 3.5)\times 10^{-3}, which agrees with the value of (42.11±0.74)×10−3(42.11\pm 0.74)\times 10^{-3} from the inclusive B→XcℓνˉℓB\to X_c\ell\bar \nu_\ell decays. Furthermore, based on the most recent ratio of ∣Vub∣/∣Vcb∣|V_{ub}|/|V_{cb}| from the exclusive Λb\Lambda_b decays, we obtain ∣Vub∣=(4.2±0.4)×10−3|V_{ub}|=(4.2\pm 0.4)\times 10^{-3}, which is close to the value of (4.49±0.24)×10−3(4.49\pm 0.24)\times 10^{-3} from the inclusive B→XuℓνˉℓB\to X_u\ell\bar \nu_\ell decays. We conclude that our determinations of ∣Vcb∣|V_{cb}| and ∣Vub∣|V_{ub}| from the exclusive Λb\Lambda_b decays favor the inclusive extractions in the BB decays.Comment: 8 pages, i figur

    Four-body baryonic decays of B→ppˉπ+π−(π+K−)B\to p \bar{p} \pi^+\pi^-(\pi^+K^-) and Λpˉπ+π−(K+K−)\Lambda \bar{p} \pi^+\pi^-(K^+K^-)

    Full text link
    We study the four-body baryonic B→B1Bˉ2M1M2B\to {\bf B_1 \bar B_2}M_1 M_2 decays with B1,2\bf B_{1,2} (M1,2M_{1,2}) being charmless baryons (mesons). In accordance with the recent LHCb observations, each decay is considered to proceed through the B→M1M2B\to M_1 M_2 transition together with the production of a baryon pair. We obtain that B(B−→Λpˉπ+π−)=(3.7−1.0+1.5)×10−6{\cal B}(B^-\to \Lambda\bar p \pi^+\pi^-)=(3.7^{+1.5}_{-1.0} )\times 10^{-6} and B(Bˉ0→ppˉπ+π−,ppˉπ+K−)=(3.0±0.9,6.6±2.4)×10−6{\cal B}(\bar B^0\to p\bar p \pi^+\pi^-,p\bar p \pi^+ K^-)=(3.0\pm 0.9,6.6\pm 2.4)\times 10^{-6}, in agreement with the data. We also predict B(B−→ΛpˉK+K−)=(3.0−0.9+1.3)×10−6{\cal B}(B^-\to\Lambda\bar p K^+ K^-)=(3.0^{+1.3}_{-0.9})\times 10^{-6}, which is accessible to the LHCb and BELLE experiments.Comment: 11 pages, 3 figure
    • …
    corecore