Convict Criminology and the Struggle for Inclusion

Convict Criminology (CC) began in the early 1990s as a reaction to the then current state of academic criminology that did not adequately reflect the voices of convicted felons. Since its beginnings, CC has attempted to draw attention to a range of problems created by the criminal justice apparatus and defenders of the status quo. Dr. Joanne Belknap’s 2014 ASC presidential address and subsequent article presented an argument that stressed the importance of activism to be considered as part of criminological research. In the process, she reviewed her career and then criticized the field of Critical Criminology, in particular Convict Criminology. The article, however, ignored the numerous efforts that CC has engaged in to build an inclusive group school, movement, organization and network that includes the diverse voices of Ph.D. educated convicts and excons, and overall reflected a superficial understanding of the history and intent of Convict Criminology. This article attempts to explain the shortcomings of Belknap’s article and clarifies misunderstandings

Prison Research from the Inside: The Role of Convict Autoethnography

A perspective that has often been absent in criminal justice research is that of former prisoners. This article discusses the establishment, in 1997, of “convict criminology,” a group of scholars producing research informed by their experiences of crime and the criminal justice process; that is, either those who have served time themselves or who have operated alongside prisoners as professionals in custodial settings. It is argued that such scholars face similar dilemmas to others in terms of emotionalism, but suggests that their emotions are of a different nature. While an “insider” perspective cannot lay claim to scientific “objectivity,” the article argues that the existence of emotion does not invalidate an “insider” criminologist’s views. Rather, the passion engendered by the experience of incarceration can add color, context, and contour to data collection, findings, and analysis and may therefore be regarded as an essential thread in the tapestry of criminological inquiry

Prison as Seen by Convict Criminologists

Most criminologists tend to base their view of prison on ideological assumptions gathered from secondary sources, with at best limited entry to the prison world. They nearly always get it wrong, as they systematically exclude the perspectives and real life experiences of their human subjects. These academic researchers have contributed to poor public policy that promotes the violent repression of prisoners in the USA and other countries. In response, Convict Criminologists are ex‐convicts working as criminology and criminal justice professors, along with “non‐con” associates, that insist that as a means for societies to develop humane, effective, and cost efficient prisons, we must develop ways to incorporate the voice of prisoners in our theorizing about, policy recommendations for, and management of the prison

Conservative management versus open reduction and internal fixation for mid-shaft clavicle fractures in adults - The Clavicle Trial: Study protocol for a multicentre randomized controlled trial

Background: Clavicle fractures account for around 4% of all fractures and up to 44% of fractures of the shoulder girdle. Fractures of the middle third (or mid-shaft) account for approximately 80% of all clavicle fractures. Management of this group of fractures is often challenging and the outcome can be unsatisfactory. In particular it is not clear whether surgery produces better outcomes than non-surgical management. Currently there is much variation in the use of surgery and a lack of good quality evidence to inform our decision.Methods/Design: We aim to undertake a multicentre randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness and safety of conservative management versus open reduction and internal fixation for displaced mid-shaft clavicle fractures in adults. Surgical treatment will be performed using the Acumed clavicle fixation system. Conservative management will consist of immobilisation in a sling at the side in internal rotation for 6 weeks or until clinical or radiological union. We aim to recruit 300 patients. These patients will be followed-up for at least 9 months. The primary endpoint will be the rate of non-union at 3 months following treatment. Secondary endpoints will be limb function measured using the Constant-Murley Score and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Score at 3 and 9 months post-operatively.Discussion: This article presents the protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial. It gives extensive details of, and the basis for, the chosen methods, and describes the key measures taken to avoid bias and to ensure validity.Trial Registration: United Kingdom Clinical Research Network ID: 8665. The date of registration of the trial is 07/09/2006. The date the first patient was recruited is 18/12/2007. © 2011 Longo et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd

The OMERACT Core Domain Set for Clinical Trials of Shoulder Disorders.

OBJECTIVE:To reach consensus on the core domains to be included in a core domain set for clinical trials of shoulder disorders using the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Filter 2.1 Core Domain Set process. METHODS:At OMERACT 2018, the OMERACT Shoulder Working Group conducted a workshop that presented the OMERACT 2016 preliminary core domain set and its rationale based upon a systematic review of domains measured in shoulder trials and international Delphi sessions involving patients, clinicians, and researchers, as well as a new systematic review of qualitative studies on the experiences of people with shoulder disorders. After discussions in breakout groups, the OMERACT core domain set for clinical trials of shoulder disorders was presented for endorsement by OMERACT 2018 participants. RESULTS:The qualitative review (n = 8) identified all domains included in the preliminary core set. An additional domain, cognitive dysfunction, was also identified, but confidence that this represents a core domain was very low. The core domain set that was endorsed by the OMERACT participants, with 71% agreement, includes 4 "mandatory" trial domains: pain, function, patient global - shoulder, and adverse events including death; and 4 "important but optional" domains: participation (recreation/work), sleep, emotional well-being, and condition-specific pathophysiological manifestations. Cognitive dysfunction was voted out of the core domain set. CONCLUSION:OMERACT 2018 delegates endorsed a core domain set for clinical trials of shoulder disorders. The next step includes identification of a core outcome measurement set that passes the OMERACT 2.1 Filter for measuring each domain

Structures of the Inhibitory Receptor Siglec-8 in Complex with a High-Affinity Sialoside Analogue and a Therapeutic Antibody

Human sialic acid binding immunoglobulin-like lectin-8 (Siglec-8) is an inhibitory receptor that triggers eosinophil apoptosis and can inhibit mast cell degranulation when engaged by specific monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) or sialylated ligands. Thus, Siglec-8 has emerged as a critical negative regulator of inflammatory responses in diverse diseases, such as allergic airway inflammation. Herein, we have deciphered the molecular recognition features of the interaction of Siglec-8 with the mAb lirentelimab (2C4, under clinical development) and with a sialoside mimetic with the potential to suppress mast cell degranulation. The three-dimensional structure of Siglec-8 and the fragment antigen binding (Fab) portion of the anti-Siglec-8 mAb 2C4, solved by X-ray crystallography, reveal that 2C4 binds close to the carbohydrate recognition domain (V-type Ig domain) on Siglec-8. We have also deduced the binding mode of a high-affinity analogue of its sialic acid ligand (9-N-napthylsufonimide-Neu5Ac, NSANeuAc) using a combination of NMR spectroscopy and X-ray crystallography. Our results show that the sialoside ring of NSANeuAc binds to the canonical sialyl binding pocket of the Siglec receptor family and that the high affinity arises from the accommodation of the NSA aromatic group in a nearby hydrophobic patch formed by the N-terminal tail and the unique G–G′ loop. The results reveal the basis for the observed high affinity of this ligand and provide clues for the rational design of the next generation of Siglec-8 inhibitors. Additionally, the specific interactions between Siglec-8 and the N-linked glycans present on the high-affinity receptor FcεRIα have also been explored by NMR.This work was supported by operating grant PID2019-107770RA-I00 (J.E.-O.) from the Agencia Estatal Investigación of Spain and by the European Research Council (ERC-2017-AdG, 788143-RECGLYCANMR to J.J.-B.). We also thank the Marie-Skłodowska-Curie actions (ITN Glytunes grant agreement no. 956758 to J.E.-O and ITN BactiVax under grant agreement no. 860325 to U.A.). Additional funding was provided by CIBER, an initiative of Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Madrid, Spain. We also thank the Ikerbasque Basque Foundation of Science and the Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness (for the postdoctoral contract Juan de la Cierva Incorporación to J.E-O). X-ray diffraction experiments described in this paper were performed using the XALOC synchrotron beamline at ALBA (Spain) and PXIII in Swiss Light Source (Switzerland)