The LPL/ADAM29 expression ratio is a novel prognosis indicator in chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Although the zeta-associated protein of 70 kDa (ZAP-70) is overexpressed in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) displaying unmutated IGVH genes and poor prognosis, a previous microarray study from our group identified overexpression of LPL and ADAM29 genes among unmutated and mutated CLL, respectively. To assess the prognostic value of these genes, we quantified their expression by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in a cohort of 127 patients with CLL and correlated this with clinical outcome, IGVH mutational status, and ZAP-70 protein expression. IGVH mutational status, ZAP-70, and the LPL and ADAM29 mRNA ratios (L/A ratio) were predictive of event-free survival for the whole cohort and for patients with stage A disease. in patients in stage B and C, the L/A ratio was an independent prognostic factor, whereas ZAP-70 did not predict survival. Simultaneous usage of the L/A ratio and ZAP-70 expression allowed an almost perfect (99%) assessment of the IGVH status in the 80% of patients with concordant results (L/A(+), ZAP-70(+) or L/A(-), ZAP-70(-)). LPL and ADAM29 gene expression could also be determined by a simple competitive multiplex reverse transcription PCR assay. Overall, quantification of LPL and ADAM29 gene expression is a strong prognostic indicator in CLL, providing better prognostic assessment than ZAP-70 in advanced stages of the disease.Hop La Pitie Salpetriere, Serv Hematol Biol, F-75013 Paris, FranceInst Pasteur, Unite Immunohematol & Immunopathol, F-75724 Paris, FranceUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Disciplina Hematol & Hemoterapia, São Paulo, BrazilInst Pasteur, Dept Ecosyst & Epidemiol Malad Infect, Paris, FranceHop La Pitie Salpetriere, Serv Immunol, Paris, FranceInst Pasteur, Ctr Rech Vaccinale & Biomed, Paris, FranceUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Disciplina Hematol & Hemoterapia, São Paulo, BrazilWeb of Scienc

HAEMATOLOGY Smear microscopy revision Smear microscopy revision: propositions by the GFHC

Abstract Despite the development of automated haematology analysers for reliable blood counts, examining blood smears under the microscope is still indispensable for confirming results when the data the analyser obtains are qualitatively or quantitatively abnormal. Although most criteria that lead to blood smear examination are widely recognised and used in laboratories, a multicentre survey indicates that they are still highly heterogeneous. To contribute to the harmonisation and standardisation of essential cellular haematology practice within the context of laboratory accreditation, the GFHC reviewed in detail the criteria used within the CBC to generate blood smears and has decided on a number of minimum recommendations. The conclusions presented in this article are based on a 'strong professional consensus', defining threshold values and various situations in which the blood smear review is desirable. They are presented as minimum recommendations for technical verification and biological validation. All laboratories are free to use more restrictive thresholds based on their patient populations