21,976 research outputs found
The magnetoresistance tensor of La(0.8)Sr(0.2)MnO(3)
We measure the temperature dependence of the anisotropic magnetoresistance
(AMR) and the planar Hall effect (PHE) in c-axis oriented epitaxial thin films
of La(0.8)Sr(0.2)MnO(3), for different current directions relative to the
crystal axes, and show that both AMR and PHE depend strongly on current
orientation. We determine a magnetoresistance tensor, extracted to 4th order,
which reflects the crystal symmetry and provides a comprehensive description of
the data. We extend the applicability of the extracted tensor by determining
the bi-axial magnetocrystalline anisotropy in our samples
Sterilization of liquids by filtration and certification of probability
Sterilization of liquids by hydrosol filtratio
Recommended from our members
Cost of saving natural gas through efficiency programs funded by utility customers: 2012–2017
This study estimates the cost of saving a therm of natural gas from energy efficiency programs funded by utility customers during the period 2012 to 2017. Berkeley Lab researchers compiled and analyzed efficiency program data reported by investor-owned utilities and other program administrators in a dozen states representative of the four U.S. Census regions — Arkansas, California, Connecticut, Iowa, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Oklahoma, Rhode Island and Utah. Depending on the year, the dataset accounts for about 50 percent to 70 percent of annual national spending on natural gas efficiency programs.
The estimated cost of saving natural gas during the study period is $0.40 per therm. The analysis also includes estimates of the program administrator cost of saved energy for three core sectors for natural gas: commercial and industrial, residential, and low-income households. It aggregates these sectors to provide regional and national values. Our metrics include savings-weighted averages, unweighted medians, and interquartile ranges (25th and 75th percentiles) of the levelized program administrator cost of saving gas, in constant 2017 dollars. In addition, the study analyzes cost trends during the study period, finding that average program costs trended downward.
The U.S. Department of Energy’s Building Technologies Office supported this work
Recommended from our members
Applying Non-Energy Impacts from Other Jurisdictions in Cost-Benefit Analyses of Energy Efficiency Programs: Resources for States for Utility Customer-Funded Programs
Avoided energy and capacity costs are the primary yardstick utilities use to determine which energy efficiency programs are cost-effective for their customers. But sometimes "non-energy impacts" — not commonly recognized as directly associated with energy generation, transmission and distribution — represent substantial benefits, such as improving comfort, air quality and public health.Considering whether and how to include non-energy impacts is an important part of cost-benefit analyses for these programs. This report offers practical considerations for deciding which non-energy impacts to include and how to apply values or methods from other jurisdictions.Researchers reviewed studies quantifying non-energy impacts used in 30 states and applied a five-point system to indicate transferability of a value or method from each study for 16 categories of non-energy impacts:Water resource costs and benefitsOther fuels costs and benefitsAvoided environmental compliance costsEnvironmental impactsProductivityHealth and safety Asset valueEnergy and/or capacity price suppression effectsAvoided costs of compliance with Renewable Portfolio Standard requirementsAvoided credit and collection costsAvoided ancillary servicesComfortEconomic development and job impactsPublic health impactsEnergy security impactsIncreased reliabilityThe U.S. Department of Energy’s Building Technologies Office supported this work
Phase operators, phase states and vector phase states for SU(3) and SU(2,1)
This paper focuses on phase operators, phase states and vector phase states
for the sl(3) Lie algebra. We introduce a one-parameter generalized oscillator
algebra A(k,2) which provides a unified scheme for dealing with su(3) (for k <
0), su(2,1) (for k > 0) and h(4) x h(4) (for k = 0) symmetries. Finite- and
infinite-dimensional representations of A(k,2) are constructed for k < 0 and k
> 0 or = 0, respectively. Phase operators associated with A(k,2) are defined
and temporally stable phase states (as well as vector phase states) are
constructed as eigenstates of these operators. Finally, we discuss a relation
between quantized phase states and a quadratic discrete Fourier transform and
show how to use these states for constructing mutually unbiased bases
Display/control requirements for VTOL aircraft
Quantative metrics were determined for system control performance, workload for control, monitoring performance, and workload for monitoring. Pilot tasks were allocated for navigation and guidance of automated commercial V/STOL aircraft in all weather conditions using an optimal control model of the human operator to determine display elements and design
- …