39 research outputs found
The role of clinicopathologic and molecular prognostic factors in the post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT): a retrospective analysis of 912 patients
OBJECTIVE: To assess the association of clinicopathologic and molecular features with loco-regional recurrence (LRR) in post-mastectomy breast cancer patients with or without adjuvant radiotherapy (PMRT).
PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data of patients undergone to mastectomy followed or not by PMRT between January 2004 and June 2013. The patients were divided according to clinicopathologic and molecular sub-classification features. LRR and Cancer Specific Survival (CSS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method; the prognostic factors were compared using long-rank tests and Cox regression model.
RESULTS: A total of 912 patients underwent to mastectomy of whom 269 (29.5%) followed by PMRT and 643 (70.5%) not; among the PMRT group, 77 underwent to the chest wall (CW) and 202 to the chest wall and lymphatic drainage (CWLD) irradiation. The median follow-up was 54 months (range, 3-118). No significant difference in terms of LRR and CSS was found between non-PMRT and PMRT group (p=0.175; and p=0.628). The multivariate analysis of LRR for patients who did not undergo PMRT showed a significant correlation with the presence of extracapsular extension (ECE)
(p=0.049), Ki-67>30% (p=0.048) and triple negative status (p=0.001). In the PMRT group, triple negative status resulted as the only variable significantly correlated to LRR (p=0.006) at the multivariate analysis and T-stage also showed a trend to significance (p=0.073). Finally, no difference in LRR control was shown between CW and
CWLD-PMRT (p=0.078).
CONCLUSIONS: After mastectomy ECE, a cut off of Ki-67>30% and triple negative status werestrictly correlated with LRR regardless of clinicopathologic stage. PMRT has a positive impact in
decreasing LRR in patients with this molecular profile. Besides, CW might represent a valid option for patients with one to three positive nodes
Gustavson, Marguerite May
Background: Recent studies have reported improvement of outcomes (progression-free survival, overall survival, and prolongation of androgen deprivation treatment-free survival) with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in non-small cell lung cancer and prostate cancer. The aim of this retrospective, multicenter study (MITO RT-01) was to define activity and safety of SBRT in a very large, real-world data set of patients with metastatic, persistent, and recurrent ovarian cancer (MPR-OC). Materials and Methods: The endpoints of the study were the rate of complete response (CR) to SBRT and the 24-month actuarial local control (LC) rate on \u201cper-lesion\u201d basis. The secondary endpoints were acute and late toxicities and the 24-month actuarial late toxicity-free survival. Objective response rate (ORR) included CR and partial response (PR). Clinical benefit (CB) included ORR and stable disease (SD). Toxicity was evaluated by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) scales, according to center policy. Logistic and Cox regression were used for the uni- and multivariate analysis of factors predicting clinical CR and actuarial outcomes. Results: CR, PR, and SD were observed in 291 (65.2%), 106 (23.8%), and 33 (7.4%) lesions, giving a rate of CB of 96.4%. Patient aged 6460 years, planning target volume (PTV) 6418 cm3, lymph node disease, and biologically effective dose \u3b1/\u3b210 > 70 Gy were associated with higher chance of CR in the multivariate analysis. With a median follow-up of 22 months (range, 3\u2013120), the 24-month actuarial LC rate was 81.9%. Achievement of CR and total dose >25 Gy were associated with better LC rate in the multivariate analysis. Mild toxicity was experienced in 54 (20.7%) patients; of 63 side effects, 48 were grade 1, and 15 were grade 2. The 24-month late toxicity-free survival rate was 95.1%. Conclusions: This study confirms the activity and safety of SBRT in patients with MPR-OC and identifies clinical and treatment parameters able to predict CR and LC rate. Implications for Practice: This study aimed to define activity and safety of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in a very large, real life data set of patients with metastatic, persistent, recurrent ovarian cancer (MPR-OC). Patient age <60 years, PTV <18 cm3, lymph node disease, and biologically effective dose \u3b1/\u3b210 >70 Gy were associated with higher chance of complete response (CR). Achievement of CR and total dose >25 Gy were associated with better local control (LC) rate. Mild toxicity was experienced in 20.7% of patients. In conclusion, this study confirms the activity and safety of SBRT in MPR-OC patients and identifies clinical and treatment parameters able to predict CR and LC rate
Angiosarcoma after adjuvant radiotherapy in high-risk squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva: A case report
Squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva represents 3-5% of gynecological cancers. The incidence is higher in postmenopausal patients; the mean age of women with vulvar cancer is between 64 and 70 years. Radiotherapy plays an increasing role in the treatment of high-risk squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva; associated with surgery it significantly improves prognosis but is also associated with serious late side-effects, such as secondary malignancies. We describe a case of a 75-year-old woman who underwent deep total vulvectomy with inguinal-femoral lymphadenectomy for high-risk, keratinizing variant HPV-negative, squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva, followed by adjuvant concomitant chemo-radiotherapy, at the University Hospital of Pisa in February 2013. Five years later she developed a very large angiosarcoma in the right abdominal wall, at the edge of the previous radiotherapy field, and underwent radical surgery. After four months, she developed bone metastasis of angiosarcoma, also treated with surgery. This experience shows that the use of new technologies allows the delivery of high doses of radiotherapy, significantly correlated with a better prognosis, but also associated with fortunately rare morbidity, such as radiation-induced angiosarcoma. Due to the presence of long, mostly post-menopausal survivors among irradiated patients, screening for second malignancies must be developed for selected high-risk survivor groups
High-dose-rate brachytherapy for non-melanoma skin cancer using tailored custom moulds – a single-centre experience
Aim of the study: The aim of this retrospective study was to analyse tumour control, toxicity, and aesthetic outcome of patients affected by non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) treated with 192 Ir high-dose-rate(HDR)-brachytherapy(BT) at the Division of Radiotherapy, University of Pisa. Material and methods: From January 2014 to December 2019 we treated 37 patients (median age 79 years; range 31–91 years) affected by NMSC, with the following histological subtypes: 62.2% basal cell carcinoma and 37.8% squamous cell carcinoma. We analysed 40 lesions with a depth ≤ 5 mm, located in 40.0% scalp, 17.5% nose, 25.0% face, and 17.5% ear, all treated with 192 Ir-based HDR-BT, using tailored custom moulds, with a median of 5 catheters (range, 1–9) spaced 1 cm apart. The most common fractionation scheme was 40 Gy in 8 daily fractions; the biological effective dose was 60 Gy. Results: The median follow-up was 25 months (range, 3–70 months). The 2-year local control rate was 90%. Common terminology criteria for adverse event (CTCAE vs. 5.0) G1 toxicities were dermatitis (52%), pain (25%), and ulceration (22%). The only G2 acute toxicities were dermatitis and ulceration. The most common G1 late toxicities were fibrosis (17%), atrophy (15%), and hypopigmentation (12%). No G3 or higher acute or late toxicity was reported. Excellent cosmetic results were observed in 65.0% of the lesions; only 1 case (2.5%) reported a poor cosmetic result. Conclusions: Surface mould HDR-BT is a safe, effective, and well tolerated treatment modality for NMSC and can be considered a good alternative, especially for elderly patients who are often unfit for surgery
Radiotherapy as Definitive Treatment of Patients with Primary Vulvar Carcinoma Unfit for Surgery and with Recurrent Vulvar Carcinoma After Primary Radical Surgery: Results of a Retrospective Single-center Study.
To assess the outcome of patients with vulvar carcinoma unfit for surgery treated with radiotherapy for primary disease and for those with recurrent disease after primary surgery.
PATIENTS AND METHODS:
The study was conducted on 16 patients with primary disease and 31 with recurrent disease.
RESULTS:
An objective response and long-term control were obtained in 43.8% and 18.8% of patients with primary carcinoma. Median survival after primary radiotherapy was 15 months. An objective response and long-term control were achieved in 100% and 20% of the 15 patients with local recurrence. Only two out of the 13 patients with groin recurrence were recovered by salvage treatment, and all three patients with distant recurrence died of their disease. Median survival after relapse in the 31 patients was 33 months.
CONCLUSION:
Radiotherapy achieves unsatisfactory results in patients with primary vulvar carcinoma who are unfit for surgery as well as in those with recurrent disease after surgery