Coarse particulate air pollution and daily mortality: A global study in 205 cities.

RATIONALE: The associations between ambient coarse particulate matter (PM2.5-10) and daily mortality is not fully understood at a global scale. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the short-term associations between PM2.5-10 and total, cardiovascular, and respiratory mortality across multiple countries/regions worldwide. METHODS: We collected daily mortality (total, cardiovascular, respiratory) and air pollution data from 205 cities in 20 countries/regions. Concentrations of PM2.5-10 were computed as the difference between inhalable and fine particulate matter. A two-stage time-series analytic approach was applied, with over-dispersed generalized linear models and multilevel meta-analysis. We fitted two-pollutant models to test the independent effect of PM2.5-10 from co-pollutants (fine particulate matter, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, ozone, and carbon monoxide). Exposure-response relationship curves were pooled and regional analyses were conducted. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A 10 μg/m3 increase in PM2.5-10 concentration on lag 0-1 day was associated with increments of 0.51% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.18%, 0.84%), 0.43% (95%CI: 0.15%, 0.71%) and 0.41% (95%CI: 0.06%, 0.77%) in total, cardiovascular, and respiratory mortality, respectively. The associations varied by country and region. These associations were robust to adjustment by all co-pollutants in two-pollutant models, especially for PM2.5. The exposure-response curves for total, cardiovascular, and respiratory mortality were positive, with steeper slopes at lower exposure ranges and without discernible thresholds. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides novel global evidence on the robust and independent associations between short-term exposure to ambient PM2.5-10 and total, cardiovascular and respiratory mortality, suggesting the need to establish a unique guideline or regulatory limit for daily concentrations of PM2.5-10

Identification, characterization and selection of autochthonous lactic acid bacteria as probiotic for feedlot cattle

Livestock microbiota is becoming a focus of interest for veterinaries, animal nutritionists and microbiologists in view to select beneficial bacteria with impact in health and animal productivity. As resident adapted microorganisms, lactic acid bacteria (LAB) were isolated, identified and characterized from the homologous host to promote their permanence/efficiency acting as additives in feedlot cattle feeding. Cultivable LAB numbers from cattle feces (CF), pens soil (PS) and feed rations (FR) ranged from 5 to 6 log CFU/g during feedlot permanence. Isolates (500) were identified by (GTG)5-PCR and sequence analysis of 16S rRNA, being represented by Enterococcus, Lactobacillus, Leuconostoc, Pediococcus and Weissella genera and 20 different species. Genetic mapping showed that predominant LAB species in CF and PS samples were Lactobacillus (Lb) mucosae (34%), Enterococcus (E) hirae (26%) and E. faecium-durans (20%), while in FR E. faecium-durans (46%), Pediococcus (P). pentosaceous, P. acidilactici (17%) and Lb. acidophilus (11%) were mainly isolated. Surface characterization showed most of LAB as high hydrophilic, however several strains from CF and PS revealed strong hydrophobic and auto-aggregative character with a positive correlation between both superficial properties. Adhesion to polystyrene displayed variable biofilm formation patterns for Enterococcus and Lactobacillus strains depending on the presence of Tween in MRS medium. When antagonistic activity of isolated LAB against bovine relevant pathogens was evaluated, organic acids and hydrogen peroxide production were mostly responsible for inhibition; bacteriocin production was shown only by a Lb. mucosae strain. In addition, tolerance to acid and bile salts showed lactobacilli to withstand GIT conditions, while enterococci were more sensitive to low acid environment. On these bases, several Lactobacillus strains may be selected to explore their potential use as direct fed bacteria in feedlot cattle.Fil: Maldonado, Natalia Cecilia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Centro de Referencia para Lactobacilos; ArgentinaFil: Aristimuño Ficoseco, Maria Cecilia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Centro de Referencia para Lactobacilos; ArgentinaFil: Mansilla, Flavia Ivana. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Centro de Referencia para Lactobacilos; ArgentinaFil: Melian, Constanza Victoria. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Centro de Referencia para Lactobacilos; ArgentinaFil: Hebert, Elvira Maria. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Centro de Referencia para Lactobacilos; ArgentinaFil: Vignolo, Graciela Margarita. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Centro de Referencia para Lactobacilos; ArgentinaFil: Nader, Maria Elena Fatima. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Centro de Referencia para Lactobacilos; Argentin