FlyORF-TaDa allows rapid generation of new lines for in vivo cell-type specific profiling of protein-DNA interactions in Drosophila melanogaster

Targeted DamID (TaDa) is an increasingly popular method of generating cell-type specific DNA binding profiles in vivo. Although sensitive and versatile, TaDa requires the generation of new transgenic fly lines for every protein that is profiled, which is both time-consuming and costly. Here, we describe the FlyORF-TaDa system for converting an existing FlyORF library of inducible open reading frames (ORFs) to TaDa lines via a genetic cross, with recombinant progeny easily identifiable by eye colour. Profiling the binding of the H3K36me3-associated chromatin protein MRG15 in larval neural stem cells using both FlyORF-TaDa and conventional TaDa demonstrates that new lines generated using this system provide accurate and highly-reproducible DamID binding profiles. Our data further show that MRG15 binds to a subset of active chromatin domains in vivo. Courtesy of the large coverage of the FlyORF library, the FlyORF-TaDa system enables the easy creation of TaDa lines for 74% of all transcription factors and chromatin modifying proteins within the Drosophila genome

FlyORF-TaDa allows rapid generation of new lines for in vivo cell-type specific profiling of protein-DNA interactions in Drosophila melanogaster

Targeted DamID (TaDa) is an increasingly popular method of generating cell-type specific DNA binding profiles in vivo. Although sensitive and versatile, TaDa requires the generation of new transgenic fly lines for every protein that is profiled, which is both time-consuming and costly. Here, we describe the FlyORF-TaDa system for converting an existing FlyORF library of inducible open reading frames (ORFs) to TaDa lines via a genetic cross, with recombinant progeny easily identifiable by eye color. Profiling the binding of the H3K36me3-associated chromatin protein MRG15 in larval neural stem cells using both FlyORF-TaDa and conventional TaDa demonstrates that new lines generated using this system provide accurate and highly-reproducible DamID binding profiles. Our data further show that MRG15 binds to a subset of active chromatin domains in vivo. Courtesy of the large coverage of the FlyORF library, the FlyORF-TaDa system enables the easy creation of TaDa lines for 74% of all transcription factors and chromatin modifying proteins within the Drosophila 26 genome

Fascin controls neuronal class-specific dendrite arbor morphology

The branched morphology of dendrites represents a functional hallmark of distinct neuronal types. Nonetheless, how diverse neuronal class-specific dendrite branches are generated is not understood. We investigated specific classes of sensory neurons of Drosophila larvae to address the fundamental mechanisms underlying the formation of distinct branch types. We addressed the function of fascin, a conserved actin-bundling protein involved in filopodium formation, in class III and class IV sensory neurons. We found that the terminal branchlets of different classes of neurons have distinctive dynamics and are formed on the basis of molecularly separable mechanisms; in particular, class III neurons require fascin for terminal branching whereas class IV neurons do not. In class III neurons, fascin controls the formation and dynamics of terminal branchlets. Previous studies have shown that transcription factor combinations define dendrite patterns; we find that fascin represents a downstream component of such programs, as it is a major effector of the transcription factor Cut in defining class III-specific dendrite morphology. Furthermore, fascin defines the morphological distinction between class III and class IV neurons. In fact, loss of fascin function leads to a partial conversion of class III neurons to class IV characteristics, while the reverse effect is obtained by fascin overexpression in class IV neurons. We propose that dedicated molecular mechanisms underlie the formation and dynamics of distinct dendrite branch types to elicit the accurate establishment of neuronal circuits

L'immunite des charges domestiques aux perturbations venant du reseau

SIGLEAvailable from INIST (FR), Document Supply Service, under shelf-number : 26165 B, issue : a.1997 n.32 / INIST-CNRS - Institut de l'Information Scientifique et TechniqueFRFranc

Centrosomin represses dendrite branching by orienting microtubule nucleation

This document is the Accepted Manuscript version of a Published Work that appeared in final form in Nature Neuroscience, after peer review and technical editing by the publisher. To access the final edited work see: https://www.nature.com/articles/nn.4099#rightslink, doi:10.1038/nn.4099.Neuronal dendrite branching is fundamental for building nervous systems. Branch formation is genetically encoded by transcriptional programs to create dendrite arbor morphological diversity for complex neuronal functions. In Drosophila sensory neurons, the transcription factor Abrupt represses branching via an unknown effector pathway. Targeted screening for branching-control effectors identified Centrosomin, the primary centrosome-associated protein for mitotic spindle maturation. Centrosomin repressed dendrite branch formation and was used by Abrupt to simplify arbor branching. Live imaging revealed that Centrosomin localized to the Golgi cis face and that it recruited microtubule nucleation to Golgi outposts for net retrograde microtubule polymerization away from nascent dendrite branches. Removal of Centrosomin enabled the engagement of wee Augmin activity to promote anterograde microtubule growth into the nascent branches, leading to increased branching. The findings reveal that polarized targeting of Centrosomin to Golgi outposts during elaboration of the dendrite arbor creates a local system for guiding microtubule polymerization.Peer reviewe

The nano-architecture of the axonal cytoskeleton

International audienceThe cytoskeleton is a cellular shapeshifter. Like these creatures of mythology and speculative fiction, the cytoskeleton can alter its physical form and shape to accommodate the immediate needs of the cell. Indeed, many a rapt student has watched the cytoskeleton of a dividing cell seemingly miraculously transform into an organized mitotic spindle and then dissolve into an indiscrete mass, right before their eyes. The extreme polarization of neurons (that is, their fundamental asymmetry, arising due to the presence of elongated processes), along with their lifelong plasticity, creates unique demands on the cytoskeleton. A remarkable example is the axon, which can grow to enormous lengths and must generate and maintain its form and function throughout life — a burden that rests largely on the cytoskeleton. The axonal cytoskeleton has three major constituents: microtubules, neurofilaments and actin (BOX 1). Each is unique, associating with its own set of binding proteins and performing specialized roles within the axon. Most of these cytoskeletal proteins are synthesized in the neu­ ronal soma and are transported along the axon. Such transport is a constitutive phenomenon that occurs throughout the life of the neuron. Thus, the axonal cytoskeleton is best understood by considering both its anatomical organization and its dynamics (including axonal transport). Given the complex morphology and physiology of neurons, the field of neurobiology has traditionally been at the forefront of adopting new optical techno­ logies as they arise. Advances in microscopy now allow us to observe cells with unprecedented spatial resolu­ tion and to follow dynamic processes with exquisite temporal detail 1. For example, super­resolution strat­ egies that circumvent the diffraction limit of optical microscopy appeared more than ten years ago (BOX 2) and have been used to reveal aspects of neuronal organ­ ization down to the scale of macromolecular com­ plexes 2. These techniques have provided key insights into the organization and function of the axonal cytoskeleton — and in particular the organization of actin and microtubules — revealing how it builds the axon and maintains its intricate architecture. Focusing on the cytoskeleton within the axon initial segment (AIS) and the more distal axon shaft, in this Review, we highlight these recent discoveries and place them in the context of earlier findings, giving the reader a tentative vision of the future. Overview of the axonal cytoskeleton The history of cytoskeletal research is essentially the pursuit of tools and techniques that allowed an ever­ closer view of this elaborate structure, a quest that continues to this day. Early studies by 17th­century microscopy pioneers highlighted a network of 'neu­ rofibrils' , which we now know were most likely neuro­ filaments 3. With the advent of electron microscopy, two types of fibrils were seen in axons: filaments measuring approximately 10 nm in diameter, corresponding to neurofilaments, and others measuring approximately 20–30 nm in diameter, corresponding to structures that eventually came to be known as microtubules 4,5. Abstract | The corporeal beauty of the neuronal cytoskeleton has captured the imagination of generations of scientists. One of the easiest cellular structures to visualize by light microscopy, its existence has been known for well over 100 years, yet we have only recently begun to fully appreciate its intricacy and diversity. Recent studies combining new probes with super-resolution microscopy and live imaging have revealed surprising details about the axonal cytoskeleton and, in particular, have discovered previously unknown actin-based structures. Along with traditional electron microscopy, these newer techniques offer a nanoscale view of the axonal cytoskeleton, which is important for our understanding of neuronal form and function, and lay the foundation for future studies. In this Review, we summarize existing concepts in the field and highlight contemporary discoveries that have fundamentally altered our perception of the axonal cytoskeleton