19 research outputs found

    Incidence and risk factors associated with surgical site infection following cesarian section at Kibungo Referral Hospital, Rwanda – A prospective cohort study

    Get PDF
    Introduction: Cesarian section (CS) is lifesaving both for the mother and the baby. Worldwide, there has been an increase in the incidence of CS. However, complications may arise postoperatively for both mother and newborn. Our aim was to determine the incidence rate of post-CS surgical site infection (SSI), identify factors associated with SSI, and identify the most frequent microorganisms associated with the presence of post-CS SSI.Methods: This is a prospective cohort study conducted at KRH, including all CS, performed from February to April 2020. Patient’s demographics, operative management, and outcomes were analyzed. Results: A total of 201 patients aged between 15 to 47 years were operated on and 3.48% developed SSI. 90% were from Ngoma district, 47% had secondary education followed by 36% with primary education. The majority (97%) had no comorbidities. Povidone and chlorhexidine combined was the most commonly used disinfectant. 53% were emergencies and 92% of CS were performed by general practitioners. The average duration of operation was between 30 to 45minutes. Showering prior to operation (RR=0.39) at 95% CI [0.005-0.29], not shaving 30 minutes prior to incision (RR: 25.5) at 95% CI [3.5-18.7] and use of both povidone and chlorhexidine for skin preparation (RR= 0.15) at 95% CI [0.1-1.6] are associated with reduced risk of developing SSI. Obstructed labor/dystocia ((RR=4.55) at 95%, CI [1.6-45.4]) increases the infection risk. Staphylococcus aureus was the most frequently isolated microorganism in post-CS SSI patients.Conclusion: Active hospital infection services and adherence to evidence-based guidelines for SSI prevention measures would reduce the post-CS SSI incidence rate and improve patient care

    Interactive video games to reduce paediatric procedural pain and anxiety: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Full text link
    Background: Procedural pain and anxiety in children can be poorly controlled, leading to significant short- and long-term sequelae, such as longer procedure times or future healthcare avoidance. Caregiver anxiety can exacerbate these effects. We aimed to evaluate the effect of interactive video game interventions on children's procedural pain and anxiety, including the effect of different types of video games on those outcomes. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of interactive video games compared with standard care in children (0–18 yr) undergoing painful procedures. We searched the databases MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO. We conducted random-effects meta-analysis using ‘R’ of children's procedural pain and anxiety and caregivers' anxiety. Results: Of 2185 studies screened, 36 were eligible (n=3406 patients). Studies commonly involved venous access (33%) or day surgery (31%). Thirty-four studies were eligible for meta-analyses. Interactive video games appear to reduce children's procedural pain (standardised mean difference [SMD]=–0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI]: –0.67 to –0.20), anxiety (SMD=0.61; 95% CI: –0.88 to –0.34), and caregivers' procedural anxiety (SMD=–0.31; 95% CI: –0.58 to –0.04). We observed no difference between preparatory and distracting games, or between virtual reality and non-virtual reality games. We also observed no difference between interactive video games compared with standard care for most medical outcomes (e.g. procedure length), except a reduced need for restraint. Studies reported minimal adverse effects and typically had high intervention acceptability and satisfaction. Conclusions: Our findings support introducing easily available video games, such as distraction-based conventional video games, into routine practice to minimise paediatric procedural pain and child/caregiver anxiety

    False negative rates in Drosophila cell-based RNAi screens: a case study

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>High-throughput screening using RNAi is a powerful gene discovery method but is often complicated by false positive and false negative results. Whereas false positive results associated with RNAi reagents has been a matter of extensive study, the issue of false negatives has received less attention.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We performed a meta-analysis of several genome-wide, cell-based <it>Drosophila </it>RNAi screens, together with a more focused RNAi screen, and conclude that the rate of false negative results is at least 8%. Further, we demonstrate how knowledge of the cell transcriptome can be used to resolve ambiguous results and how the number of false negative results can be reduced by using multiple, independently-tested RNAi reagents per gene.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>RNAi reagents that target the same gene do not always yield consistent results due to false positives and weak or ineffective reagents. False positive results can be partially minimized by filtering with transcriptome data. RNAi libraries with multiple reagents per gene also reduce false positive and false negative outcomes when inconsistent results are disambiguated carefully.</p

    Nucleolin, a Shuttle Protein Promoting Infection of Human Monocytes by Francisella tularensis

    Get PDF
    International audienceWe herein confirm the importance of nucleolin expression for LVS binding and its specificity as nucleolin is not involved in binding of another intracellular pathogen as L. monocytogenes or an inert particle. Association of nucleolin with F. tularensis during infection continues intracellularly after endocytosis of the bacteria. The present work therefore unravels for the first time the presence of nucleolin in the phagosomal compartment of macrophages

    Host Factors Required for Modulation of Phagosome Biogenesis and Proliferation of Francisella tularensis within the Cytosol

    Get PDF
    Francisella tularensis is a highly infectious facultative intracellular bacterium that can be transmitted between mammals by arthropod vectors. Similar to many other intracellular bacteria that replicate within the cytosol, such as Listeria, Shigella, Burkholderia, and Rickettsia, the virulence of F. tularensis depends on its ability to modulate biogenesis of its phagosome and to escape into the host cell cytosol where it proliferates. Recent studies have identified the F. tularensis genes required for modulation of phagosome biogenesis and escape into the host cell cytosol within human and arthropod-derived cells. However, the arthropod and mammalian host factors required for intracellular proliferation of F. tularensis are not known. We have utilized a forward genetic approach employing genome-wide RNAi screen in Drosophila melanogaster-derived cells. Screening a library of ∼21,300 RNAi, we have identified at least 186 host factors required for intracellular bacterial proliferation. We silenced twelve mammalian homologues by RNAi in HEK293T cells and identified three conserved factors, the PI4 kinase PI4KCA, the ubiquitin hydrolase USP22, and the ubiquitin ligase CDC27, which are also required for replication in human cells. The PI4KCA and USP22 mammalian factors are not required for modulation of phagosome biogenesis or phagosomal escape but are required for proliferation within the cytosol. In contrast, the CDC27 ubiquitin ligase is required for evading lysosomal fusion and for phagosomal escape into the cytosol. Although F. tularensis interacts with the autophagy pathway during late stages of proliferation in mouse macrophages, this does not occur in human cells. Our data suggest that F. tularensis utilizes host ubiquitin turnover in distinct mechanisms during the phagosomal and cytosolic phases and phosphoinositide metabolism is essential for cytosolic proliferation of F. tularensis. Our data will facilitate deciphering molecular ecology, patho-adaptation of F. tularensis to the arthropod vector and its role in bacterial ecology and patho-evolution to infect mammals

    The Drosophila melanogaster host model

    Get PDF
    The deleterious and sometimes fatal outcomes of bacterial infectious diseases are the net result of the interactions between the pathogen and the host, and the genetically tractable fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, has emerged as a valuable tool for modeling the pathogen–host interactions of a wide variety of bacteria. These studies have revealed that there is a remarkable conservation of bacterial pathogenesis and host defence mechanisms between higher host organisms and Drosophila. This review presents an in-depth discussion of the Drosophila immune response, the Drosophila killing model, and the use of the model to examine bacterial–host interactions. The recent introduction of the Drosophila model into the oral microbiology field is discussed, specifically the use of the model to examine Porphyromonas gingivalis–host interactions, and finally the potential uses of this powerful model system to further elucidate oral bacterial-host interactions are addressed

    Age-related genotypic and phenotypic differences in Moraxella catarrhalis isolates from children and adults presenting with respiratory disease in 2001-2002

    No full text
    Moraxella catarrhalis is generally associated with upper respiratory tract infections in children and lower respiratory tract infections in adults. However, little is known regarding the population biology of isolates infecting these two age groups. To address this, a population-screening strategy was employed to investigate 195 worldwide M. catarrhalis isolates cultured from children (20 years of age) presenting with respiratory disease in
    corecore