No Evidence of a Drug-Drug Interaction Between Letermovir (MK-8228) and Mycophenolate Mofetil

Introduction: Letermovir (MK-8228) is a potent, oncedaily inhibitor of the cytomegalovirus (CMV) terminase complex that is being developed for the prophylaxis of CMV infection in transplant patients. This study evaluated the pharmacokinetic interactions, safety, and tolerability of letermovir when coadministered in healthy subjects with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), which is the morpholinoethyl ester prodrug of mycophenolic acid (MPA). Methods: This was an open-label trial in 14 healthy female subjects that explored the pharmacokinetic parameters of a single 1 g oral dose of MMF administered alone on Day 1 and coadministered on Day 12 with 480 mg oral once-daily letermovir given on Day 5 and from Day 8 continued through Day 16. Letermovir PK was assessed at single dose (Day 5) and at steady state on Day 12 (with MMF) and Day 16 (alone following MMF washout). Results: Coadministration of 480 mg qd letermovir at steady state with a single dose of 1 g of MMF had no effect on the pharmacokinetics of MPA. The MPA AUC0-inf and Cmax geometric mean ratios (GMRs) [90% confidence interval] for the comparison (MMF with letermovir/ MMF alone) were 1.08 [0.96, 1.21] and 0.96 [0.81, 1.13], respectively. Coadministration of a single dose of 1 g MMF with 480 mg qd letermovir at steady state had no clinically meaningful effect on the pharmacokinetics of letermovir, with AUC0-24 and Cmax GMR of 1.18 [1.04, 1.32] and 1.11 [0.93, 1.34], respectively. The letermovir geometric mean accumulation ratio (Day 16/Day 5) and 95% CI were 1.13 [0.90, 1.42] for AUC0-24 and 1.01 [ 0.79, 1.28] f or Cmax, indicating that accumulation of letermovir when administered as daily doses is minimal. All related AEs were reported as mild in severity and resolved. Conclusions: Multiple-dose administration of 480 mg letermovir daily with a single dose of 1 g MMF was generally well tolerated by the healthy subjects in this study. Coadministration of letermovir and MMF had no clinically meaningful effect on the PK of letermovir or MPA. Letermovir and MMF may be coadministered without dose adjustment

RESTORE-IMI 1: A Multicenter, Randomized, Doubleblind Trial Comparing Efficacy and Safety of Imipenem/Relebactam vs Colistin Plus Imipenem in Patients With Imipenem-nonsusceptible Bacterial Infections

Background. The β-lactamase inhibitor relebactam can restore imipenem activity against imipenem-nonsusceptible gram-negative pathogens. We evaluated imipenem/relebactam for treating imipenem-nonsusceptible infections. Methods. Randomized, controlled, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Hospitalized patients with hospital-acquired/ventilatorassociated pneumonia, complicated intraabdominal infection, or complicated urinary tract infection caused by imipenemnonsusceptible (but colistin- and imipenem/relebactam-susceptible) pathogens were randomized 2:1 to 5–21 days imipenem/ relebactam or colistin+imipenem. Primary endpoint: favorable overall response (defined by relevant endpoints for each infection type) in the modified microbiologic intent-to-treat (mMITT) population (qualifying baseline pathogen and ≥1 dose study treatment). Secondary endpoints: clinical response, all-cause mortality, and treatment-emergent nephrotoxicity. Safety analyses included patients with ≥1 dose study treatment. Results. Thirty-one patients received imipenem/relebactam and 16 colistin+imipenem. Among mITT patients (n = 21 imipenem/relebactam, n = 10 colistin+imipenem), 29% had Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores >15, 23% had creatinine clearance <60 mL/min, and 35% were aged ≥65 years. Qualifying baseline pathogens: Pseudomonas aeruginosa (77%), Klebsiella spp. (16%), other Enterobacteriaceae (6%). Favorable overall response was observed in 71% imipenem/relebactam and 70% colistin+imipenem patients (90% confidence interval [CI] for difference, –27.5, 21.4), day 28 favorable clinical response in 71% and 40% (90% CI, 1.3, 51.5), and 28-day mortality in 10% and 30% (90% CI, –46.4, 6.7), respectively. Serious adverse events (AEs) occurred in 10% of imipenem/relebactam and 31% of colistin+imipenem patients, drug-related AEs in 16% and 31% (no drugrelated deaths), and treatment-emergent nephrotoxicity in 10% and 56% (P = .002), respectively. Conclusions. Imipenem/relebactam is an efficacious and well-tolerated treatment option for carbapenem-nonsusceptible infection

Vibrio cholerae interactions with the gastrointestinal tract: lessons from animal studies.

Vibrio cholerae is a curved Gram-negative rod that causes the diarrheal disease cholera. One hundred and twenty five years of study of V. cholerae microbiology have made this lethal pathogen arguably the most well-understood non-invasive mucosal pathogen. Over the past 25 years, modern molecular techniques have permitted the identification of many genes and cellular processes that are critical for V. cholerae colonization of the gastrointestinal tract. Review of the literature reveals that there are two classes of genes that influence V. cholerae colonization of the suckling mouse intestine, the most commonly used animal model to study V. cholerae pathogenesis. Inactivation of one class of genes results in profound attenuation of V. cholerae intestinal colonization, whereas inactivation of the other class of genes results in only moderate colonization defects. The latter class of genes suggests that V. cholerae may colonize several intestinal niches that impose distinct requirements and biological challenges, thus raising the possibility that there is physiologic heterogeneity among the infecting population. Efficient V. cholerae intestinal colonization and subsequent dissemination to the environment appears to require temporally ordered expression of sets of genes during the course of infection. Key challenges for future investigations of V. cholerae pathogenicity will be to assess the degree of heterogeneity in the infecting population, whether such heterogeneity has functional significance, and if stochastic processes contribute to generation of heterogeneity in vivo