Influence of Small-Scale Inhomogeneities on the Cosmological Consistency Tests

The current cosmological dark sector (dark matter plus dark energy) is challenging our comprehension about the physical processes taking place in the Universe. Recently, some authors tried to falsify the basic underlying assumptions of such dark matter-dark energy paradigm. In this Letter, we show that oversimplifications of the measurement process may produce false positives to any consistency test based on the globally homogeneous and isotropic LCDM model and its expansion history based on distance measurements. In particular, when local inhomogeneity effects due to clumped matter or voids are taken into account, an apparent violation of the basic assumptions ("Copernican Principle") seems to be present. Conversely, the amplitude of the deviations also probes the degree of reliability underlying the phenomenological Dyer-Roeder procedure by confronting its predictions with the accuracy of the weak lensing approach. Finally, a new method is devised to reconstruct the effects of the inhomogeneities in a LCDM model, and some suggestions of how to distinguish between clumpiness (or void) effects from different cosmologies are discussed.Comment: 18 pages, 2 figures. Improved version accepted for publication as a Letter in MNRA

Studying light propagation in a locally homogeneous universe through an extended Dyer-Roeder approach

Light is affected by local inhomogeneities in its propagation, which may alter distances and so cosmological parameter estimation. In the era of precision cosmology, the presence of inhomogeneities may induce systematic errors if not properly accounted. In this vein, a new interpretation of the conventional Dyer-Roeder (DR) approach by allowing light received from distant sources to travel in regions denser than average is proposed. It is argued that the existence of a distribution of small and moderate cosmic voids (or "black regions") implies that its matter content was redistributed to the homogeneous and clustered matter components with the former becoming denser than the cosmic average in the absence of voids. Phenomenologically, this means that the DR smoothness parameter (denoted here by $\alpha_E$) can be greater than unity, and, therefore, all previous analyses constraining it should be rediscussed with a free upper limit. Accordingly, by performing a statistical analysis involving 557 type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) from Union2 compilation data in a flat $\Lambda$CDM model we obtain for the extended parameter, $\alpha_E=1.26^{+0.68}_{-0.54}$ ($1\sigma$). The effects of $\alpha_E$ are also analyzed for generic $\Lambda$CDM models and flat XCDM cosmologies. For both models, we find that a value of $\alpha_E$ greater than unity is able to harmonize SNe Ia and cosmic microwave background observations thereby alleviating the well-known tension between low and high redshift data. Finally, a simple toy model based on the existence of cosmic voids is proposed in order to justify why $\alpha_E$ can be greater than unity as required by supernovae data.Comment: 5 pages, 2 figures. Title modified, results unchanged. It matches version published as a Brief Report in Phys. Rev.

Comment on "Constraining the smoothness parameter and dark energy using observational H(z) data"

In this Comment we discuss a recent analysis by Yu et al. [RAA 11, 125 (2011)] about constraints on the smoothness $\alpha$ parameter and dark energy models using observational $H(z)$ data. It is argued here that their procedure is conceptually inconsistent with the basic assumptions underlying the adopted Dyer-Roeder approach. In order to properly quantify the influence of the $H(z)$ data on the smoothness $\alpha$ parameter, a $\chi^2$-test involving a sample of SNe Ia and $H(z)$ data in the context of a flat $\Lambda$CDM model is reanalyzed. This result is confronted with an earlier approach discussed by Santos et al. (2008) without $H(z)$ data. In the ($\Omega_m, \alpha$) plane, it is found that such parameters are now restricted on the intervals $0.66 \leq \alpha \leq 1.0$ and $0.27 \leq \Omega_m \leq 0.37$ within 95.4% confidence level (2$\sigma$), and, therefore, fully compatible with the homogeneous case. The basic conclusion is that a joint analysis involving $H(z)$ data can indirectly improve our knowledge about the influence of the inhomogeneities. However, this happens only because the $H(z)$ data provide tighter constraints on the matter density parameter $\Omega_m$.Comment: 3 pages, 1 figure, submitted to Research in Astronomy and Astrophysic