An HIV-1 clade C DNA prime, NYVAC boost vaccine regimen induces reliable, polyfunctional, and long-lasting T cell responses

The EuroVacc 02 phase I trial has evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of a prime-boost regimen comprising recombinant DNA and the poxvirus vector NYVAC, both expressing a common immunogen consisting of Env, Gag, Pol, and Nef polypeptide domain from human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 clade C isolate, CN54. 40 volunteers were randomized to receive DNA C or nothing on day 0 and at week 4, followed by NYVAC C at weeks 20 and 24. The primary immunogenicity endpoints were measured at weeks 26 and 28 by the quantification of T cell responses using the interferon γ enzyme-linked immunospot assay. Our results indicate that the DNA C plus NYVAC C vaccine regimen was highly immunogenic, as indicated by the detection of T cell responses in 90% of vaccinees and was superior to responses induced by NYVAC C alone (33% of responders). The vaccine-induced T cell responses were (a) vigorous in the case of the env response (mean 480 spot-forming units/106 mononuclear cells at weeks 26/28), (b) polyfunctional for both CD4 and CD8 T cell responses, (c) broad (the average number of epitopes was 4.2 per responder), and (d) durable (T cell responses were present in 70% of vaccinees at week 72). The vaccine-induced T cell responses were strongest and most frequently directed against Env (91% of vaccines), but smaller responses against Gag-Pol-Nef were also observed in 48% of vaccinees. These results support the development of the poxvirus platform in the HIV vaccine field and the further clinical development of the DNA C plus NYVAC C vaccine regimen

Use of anti-CMV immunoglobulins in lung transplant recipients: The French experience

International audienceRational: Pending the authorization of new anti-CMV drugs with fewer adverse effects, exploring the possibilities offered by CMV immunoglobulins (CMVIG) seems necessary. In France, access to CMVIG requires official authorization by the national Health authority and is restricted to second line rescue therapy for CMV infection/disease. The aim of this multicenter retrospective study is to describe the indications and clinical situations that justified its use in France. Methods: A multicenter retrospective study included 22 lung transplant patients over a 3-year period. Data on clinical indication, tolerance and efficacy were collected. Results: The main indication for CMVIG initiation, which was documented in 17 of them (82%) was complex clinical situations resulting from side effects to antiviral drug. CMVIG indication was documented as treatment for 15 patients (68%) and as a secondary prophylaxis for 7 patients (32%). Only one side effect (pruritus during infusion with no anaphylactic symptoms) attributable to CMVIG was reported. After CMVIG initiation, no recurrence of infection or disease was observed during a median follow-up of 174 (12–682) days after treatment initiation for respectively 68% and 66% of the patients. Conclusion: This study describes an unusual indication of CMVIG use as a last resort treatment in complex situations, based on clinical needs. CMVIG could be useful to change the course of CMV infection with minimal adverse effects or comorbidity