Hanging-related injury in Pietermaritzburg, South Africa

BACKGROUND: Hanging is a common form of self-harm, and emergency care physicians will not infrequently be called upon to manage a survivor.Despite the relative frequency of the injury, there is a paucity of literature on the topic and the spectrum and incidence of associated injuries are poorly described. OBJECTIVES: To review experience with management of victims of hanging at a major trauma centre in South Africa. METHODS: All patients treated by the Pietermaritzburg Metropolitan Trauma Service following a hanging incident between December 2012 and December 2018 were identified from the Hybrid Electronic Medical Registry. Basic demographics were recorded, and the management and outcome of each patient were noted. RESULTS: During the 6-year period under review, a total of 154 patients were seen following a hanging incident. The mean age was 29.4 years. There were 24 females (15.6%) and 130 males (84.4%). The vast majority (n=150; 97.5%) had attempted suicide, and only 4 hangings (2.5%) were accidental. A total of 92 patients (60.9%) had consumed alcohol prior to the incident. There were 23 patients with a Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) 12 (mild TBI). A total of 7 patients (4.5%) required intensive care unit admission, and 25 (16.2%) required intubation. The following extracranial injuries were documented on computed tomography scans: hyoid bone fractures (n=2), cervical spine fracture (n=10), mandible fracture (n=4) and oesophageal injury (n=1). Intracranial pathology was evident on 27.0% of scans, with the most common finding being global cerebral ischaemia. The mortality rate was 2.5% (4/154). CONCLUSIONS: Hanging is a common mechanism of self-harm. It is associated with significant injuries and mortality. The acute management of hanging should focus on airway protection followed by detailed imaging of the head and neck. Further work must attempt to include mortuary data on hanging

Falanga: The clinical correlates of surgical outcomes as a result of foot whipping in a resource poor setting

Background: Falanga is a punishment that involves hitting the bare soles of a person's feet. The consequences of this punishment may be limb and life-threatening. Post-traumatic acute kidney injury (AKI) secondary to rhabdomyolysis is a well-documented complication. Patients often require prompt surgical intervention and renal replacement therapy (RRT). The clinical and biochemical presentation of these patients and subsequent outcomes are poorly understood. Aims: This prospective observational study describes the clinical presentation and effects of foot whipping on patient outcomes. Methodology: Prospective data were collected over a one-year period for 135 patients presenting following blunt force assault admitted to a single centre. Presenting clinical characteristics and patient outcomes were recorded and correlations between presenting clinical characteristics and surgical and clinical outcomes were assessed. Results: Of 138 patients presenting following blunt force assault 96% were male with a mean age of 28.8 ± 8.01. Thirty-six out of the 138 patients presenting following blunt force assault had received foot-whipping only (falanga group, FG). Ten of these 36 patients in the FG group required surgical intervention, with one requiring a below knee amputation, compared with only two patients who required surgical intervention in the group who experienced blunt force trauma not restricted to foot whipping (Sjambok group). Average length of stay was 4 days (range 2-38) in FG group compared with 5 (range 1-21) in SG group, with no mortalities in either group. For patients in the FG, Hb was higher at presentation compared to patients in the SG group (135.2 33.7 vs 124.2 21.3, p = 0.03) and correlated positively with the need for surgical intervention (r = 0.6, p < 0.01). In this same group, the presenting characteristics of CK (4251.3 3087.4, p = 0.1 vs 7422.6 12347.7, p = 0.1) and urine output (0.95 0.4 vs 0.7 0.4) positively correlated with RRT [CK r = 0.6, p < 0.01, UO r = 0.46, p < 0.01]. Conclusion: Patients who present following falanga frequently require surgical intervention and the related healthcare utilisation and morbidity is high. Clinical indicators of a greater systemic injury at presentation may correlate with an increased likelihood of requiring surgical intervention or RRT

Application of the AAST EGS Grade for Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction to a Multi-national Patient Population

Background: The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) anatomic severity grading system for adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO) has demonstrated to be a valid tool in North American patient populations. Using a multi-national patient cohort, we retrospectively assessed the validity the AAST ASBO grading system and estimated disease severity in a global population in order to correlate with several key clinical outcomes. Methods: Multicenter retrospective review during 2012\u20132016 from four centers, Minnesota USA, Bologna Italy, Pietermaritzburg South Africa, and Bucharest Romania, was performed. Adult patients (age 65 18) with ASBO were identified. Baseline demographics, physiologic parameters, laboratory results, operative and imaging details, outcomes were collected. AAST ASBO grades were assigned by independent reviewers. Univariate and multivariable analyses with odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were performed. Results: There were 789 patients with a median [IQR] age of 58 [40\u201375] years; 47% were female. The AAST ASBO grades were I (n = 180, 23%), II (n = 443, 56%), III (n = 87, 11%), and IV (n = 79, 10%). Successful non-operative management was 58%. Conversion rate from laparoscopy to laparotomy was 33%. Overall mortality and complication and temporary abdominal closure rates were 2, 46, and 4.7%, respectively. On regression, independent predictors for mortality included grade III (OR 4.4 95%CI 1.1\u20137.3), grade IV (OR 7.4 95%CI 1.7\u20139.4), pneumonia (OR 5.6 95%CI 1.4\u201311.3), and failing non-operative management (OR 2.4 95%CI 1.3\u20136.7). Conclusion: The AAST EGS grade can be assigned with ease at any surgical facility using operative or imaging findings. The AAST ASBO severity grading system has predictive validity for important clinical outcomes and allows for standardization across institutions, providers, and future research. Disease severity and outcomes varied between countries. Level of evidence III: Study type Retrospective multi-institutional cohort study