11 research outputs found

    Validation and application of a multiparameter model for the densification of biochar

    Get PDF
    Densification is generally addressed to improve both the mechanical properties and the energy density of biomass feedstock. For such reason, it can also be used for biochar. However, the investigation of larger scales production by smaller academic equipment is not straightforward. It is therefore relevant to have access to models to facilitate a reliable comparison between the two different scales. In 2011, Holm et al. provided and validated a multiparameter model for analyzing industrial wood pelleting by a lab-scale single pellet press1. In 2017, the model was further verified for torrefied wood pelleting by Puig-Arnavat et al2. The intention of the authors of the present study was to prove the suitability of this model for pyrolyzed wood. It may help to understand how the densification process can be optimized at larger scales, especially regarding the forces that act through the pelleting channel, which are often cause of damages. Theoretically the model links the pelleting pressure , that the pellets undergo when ejected out of the channel, to the compression ratio c = x / 2r (where x is the length of the channel and r is its radius) 1. This is described by the equation: Please click Additional Files below to see the full abstract

    Considerations on factors affecting biocarbon densification behavior based on a multiparameter model

    No full text
    The optimization of upscaled biochar pelleting is limited by lack of knowledge regarding the effects of process parameters. A multiparameter model, coupled to a single pellet press unit, was for the first time applied to biochar production to predict the upscaled biochar pelleting process behavior. The model permits to estimate in a time and cost-effective way how the die friction forces, quantified through the pellet exiting pressure, are affected by the key process parameters. It was observed that to achieve acceptably low exiting pressures (in the order of 100 MPa), it was critical to produce biochar at high temperatures (e.g. 600 °C). Addition of water as a binder is also beneficial, while pelletization temperature does not significantly affect the exiting pressure. Furthermore, when pyrolysis oil was used as a binder, lower exiting pressures were measured. Biochar returned higher exiting pressure values compared with untreated wood, but lower compared with torrefied wood. Moreover, the correlation between density and compressive strength was also examined. It was found that the exiting pressure trend is a good indicator to estimate the mechanical quality of the pellets

    Considerations on factors affecting biochar densification behavior based on a multiparameter model

    Get PDF
    The optimization of upscaled biochar pelleting is limited by lack of knowledge regarding the effects of process parameters. A multiparameter model, coupled to a single pellet press unit, was for the first time applied to biochar production to predict the upscaled biochar pelleting process behavior. The model permits to estimate in a time and cost-effective way how the die friction forces, quantified through the pellet exiting pressure, are affected by the key process parameters. It was observed that to achieve acceptably low exiting pressures (in the order of 100 MPa), it was critical to produce biochar at high temperatures (e.g. 600 °C). Addition of water as a binder is also beneficial, while pelletization temperature does not significantly affect the exiting pressure. Furthermore, when pyrolysis oil was used as a binder, lower exiting pressures were measured. Biochar returned higher exiting pressure values compared with untreated wood, but lower compared with torrefied wood. Moreover, the correlation between density and compressive strength was also examined. It was found that the exiting pressure trend is a good indicator to estimate the mechanical quality of the pellets.publishedVersionPaid Open AccessUNIT agreemen

    LCA Analysis of Biocarbon Pellet Production to Substitute Coke

    Get PDF
    Biocarbon is a promising alternative to fossil reductants for decreasing greenhouse gas emissions and increasing sustainability of the metallurgical industry. In comparison to conventional reductants (i.e., coke and coal), biocarbon has low density, poor mechanical strength and high reactivity. Densification is an efficient way to upgrade biocarbon and improve its undesirable properties. In this study, woody biocarbon is compressed into pellets using pyrolysis oils as a binder. In fact both pyrolysis oils and charcoal can be produced through the slow pyrolysis process and represent respectively the liquid product and the solid product. Pyrolysis gases can be used to sustain the process. Mass and energy balance of the biocarbon pelletization process are calculated and used to implement a LCA analysis. Final use of the produced biocarbon will be in the silicon industry in Norway.LCA Analysis of Biocarbon Pellet Production to Substitute CokepublishedVersio

    Considerations on factors affecting biocarbon densification behavior based on a multiparameter model

    No full text
    The optimization of upscaled biochar pelleting is limited by lack of knowledge regarding the effects of process parameters. A multiparameter model, coupled to a single pellet press unit, was for the first time applied to biochar production to predict the upscaled biochar pelleting process behavior. The model permits to estimate in a time and cost-effective way how the die friction forces, quantified through the pellet exiting pressure, are affected by the key process parameters. It was observed that to achieve acceptably low exiting pressures (in the order of 100 MPa), it was critical to produce biochar at high temperatures (e.g. 600 °C). Addition of water as a binder is also beneficial, while pelletization temperature does not significantly affect the exiting pressure. Furthermore, when pyrolysis oil was used as a binder, lower exiting pressures were measured. Biochar returned higher exiting pressure values compared with untreated wood, but lower compared with torrefied wood. Moreover, the correlation between density and compressive strength was also examined. It was found that the exiting pressure trend is a good indicator to estimate the mechanical quality of the pellets

    CO2 reactivity assessment of woody biomass biocarbons for metallurgical purposes

    No full text
    Replacing the use of fossil reductants with biocarbons in metallurgical industries has a great potential with respect to reducing CO2 emissions and the contribution from this industry to the increasing greenhouse gas effect. However, biocarbons are significantly different from fossil reductants and the biocarbon properties vary in a wide range depending on the raw biomass properties and the biocarbon production process conditions. A key property of the biocarbons is their reactivity in the specific metallurgical process. The reactivity should be appropriate for the specific metallurgical process, to ensure an optimum reduction process. Especially important is the biocarbon reactivity towards CO2, i.e. the CO2 gasification of biocarbon fixed carbon. A standard method has earlier been developed by the metallurgical industry to test the CO2 reactivity of coal and coke. This can be adopted also for biocarbons. However, a simpler and more cost-efficient reactivity test method is wished for. For the silicon industry, also SiO reactivity is important and a standard method has been developed. This is very expensive to carry out, and also here a simpler and more cost-efficient reactivity test method is wished for. If a qualitative correlation between SiO and CO2 reactivity could be established as well, this would be very beneficial for this metallurgical industry. In this study, the main objectives were to assess the CO2 reactivity of biocarbons produced from different woody biomass in two experimental setups, a standardized setup and a thermogravimetric analyser (TGA), and to compare with the reactivity of fossil reductants. Spruce and birch stem wood and in addition their forest residues were tested. The results show that even if quantitatively different results were found in the two experimental setups, the qualitative results were the same, and hence the TGA test provides the opportunity of a simplified and cost-efficient CO2 reactivity test method. The biocarbon from the forest residues showed a higher reactivity than stem wood biocarbon, probably due to the higher ash content in the forest residues and their biocarbons, giving a catalytic effect. Compared to coke the biocarbons were more reactive
    corecore