Temporal trend of drug-resistance and APOBEC editing in PBMC genotypic resistance tests from HIV-1 infected virologically suppressed individuals

Background: We aimed at evaluating the temporal trend of drug-resistance and APOBEC editing from HIV-DNA genotypic resistance tests (GRT) in virologically suppressed individuals.Material and methods: Major resistance mutations (MRM), genotypic susceptibility score (GSS) for the current regimen and APOBEC-related mutations (APO-M) were evaluated. Potential changes in trends of MRM and APO-M over-time were assessed and predictors of MRM detection or sub-optimal GSS (GSS<2) at HIV-DNA-GRT were estimated through logistic regression analyses.Results: Among the 1126 individuals included, 396 (35.2%) harboured at least one MRM (23.4% to NRTI, 18.8% to NNRTI, 7.7% to PI and 1.4% to INSTI [N=724]); 132 (12.3%) individuals showed a GSS <2. APO-M and stop codons were found in 229 (20.3%) and 105 (9.3%) individuals, respectively. APO-DRMs were found in 16.8% of individuals and were more likely observed in those individuals with stop codons (40.0%) compared to those without (14.4%, P<0.001). From 2010 to 2021 no significant changes of resistance or APO-M were found. Positive predictors of MRM detection at HIV-DNA GRT were drug abuse, subtype B infection, and a prolonged and complex treatment history. Perinatal infection and having at least 2 stop codons were associated with a current suboptimal regimen.Conclusions: In virologically suppressed individuals, resistance in HIV-DNA and the extent of APOBEC editing were generally stable in the last decade. A careful evaluation of APOBEC editing might be helpful to improve the reliability of HIV-DNA GRT. Further investigations are required to understand how to apply the estimation of APOBEC editing in refining genotypic evaluation

Quantification of HIV-DNA and residual viremia in patients starting ART by droplet digital PCR: Their dynamic decay and correlations with immunological parameters and virological success

Background: Accurate quantification of total HIV-DNA and residual-viremia by sensitive assays is extremely useful to optimize monitoring of ART-treated patients. Objectives: To evaluate the performances of two ddPCR-based assays for HIV-DNA and residual-viremia quantification, and the correlations of pre-ART HIV-DNA with plasma HIV-RNA, CD4 + T, CD4/CD8 and virological-success (VS) during first-line ART. Study design: Plasma HIV-RNA, total HIV-DNA, CD4 + T, CD4/CD8 were evaluated at baseline of ART, at VS (viral-load <50copies/ml), and at 6 months after VS (6moVS) in 57 newly-diagnosed HIV-1 infected patients, receiving first-line modern ART. HIV-DNA (log10 copies/106CD4 + T) and residual-viremia (copies/ml) were measured with in-house ddPCR assays. Correlations were assessed by Spearman and Jonckheere-Terpstra tests. Results: HIV-DNA and residual-viremia assays showed a good linear trend between the expected and obtained values (R2 = 0.9913 and 0.9945); lower limits of detection were 32 copies/106CD4 + T and 2 copies/ml, respectively. At baseline, median (IQR) plasma HIV-RNA and HIV-DNA were 4.88(4.28\u20135.36)log10 copies/ml and 4.00(3.36\u20134.51) log10 copies/106CD4 + T cells. Residual-viremia was 8(2\u201326) and 4(2\u201312) copies/ml at VS and 6moVS. Pre-ART HIV-DNA positively correlated with plasma HIV-RNA at BL (Rho = 0.708, p < 0.001), and with residual-viremia at VS (Rho:0.383,p = 0.002). Notably, higher HIV-DNA correlated with longer time to achieve VS (median[IQR],weeks: 17.8[12.3\u201329.0] for HIV-DNA 654.5 vs. 7.4[4.1\u20138.7] for HIV-DNA<4.5, p < 0.001). Furthermore, pre-ART HIV-DNA negatively correlated with CD4 + T and CD4/CD8 at baseline, VS and 6moVS. Conclusions: Our results support the adoption of ddPCR-based assays for both HIV-DNA and residual-viremia quantifications and corroborate that pre-ART HIV-DNA is an excellent indicator in predicting viroimmunological response and VS in patients starting ART

Cryptic HBV replicative activity is frequently revealed in anti-HBC-positive/hbsag-negative patients with HIV infection by highly sensitive molecular assays, and can be predicted by integrating classical and novel serological HBV markers

The anti-HBc-positive/HBsAg-negative status is frequent in HIV-infection and correlates with poor survival. Here, by highly-sensitive assays, we evaluate cryptic HBV replication and factors correlated with its detection in 81 anti-HBc-positive/HBsAg-negative HIV-infected patients. Patients were treated for >12 months with HBV-active modern combined antiretroviral-therapy (cART) and had serum HBV-DNA < 20 IU/mL by commercial Real-Time PCR. Serum HBV-DNA was quantified by droplet digital PCR, serum HBV-RNA by an Abbott research assay, and anti-HBc titer (proposed to infer intrahepatic cccDNA) by Lumipulse/Fujirebio. Cryptic serum HBV-DNA was detected in 29.6% of patients (median (IQR): 4(1-15) IU/mL) and serum HBV-RNA in 3.7% of patients despite HBsAg-negativity and HBV-active cART. Notably, cryptic serum HBV-DNA correlated with an advanced CDC-stage (p = 0.01) and a lower anti-HBs titer (p = 0.05), while serum HBV-RNA correlated with lower nadir CD4+ cell-count (p = 0.01). By analyzing serological HBV-markers, the combination of anti-HBs < 50 mIU/mL (indicating lower immune response) plus anti-HBc > 15COI (reflecting higher HBV replicative activity) was predictive of cryptic serum HBV-DNA (OR: 4.7(1.1-21.7), p = 0.046, PPV = 62.5%, and NPV = 72%). In conclusion, cryptic HBV-replication (not detected by classical assays) characterizes a conspicuous set of anti-HBc-positive HIV-infected patients despite HBsAg-negativity and HBV-active combined antiretroviral therapy (cART). The integration of classical and novel markers may help identify patients with cryptic HBV-replication, thus optimizing the monitoring of anti-HBc-positive/HBsAg-negative HIV-infected patients