Exploring men's and women's experiences of depression and engagement with health professionals: more similarities than differences? A qualitative interview study

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>It is argued that the ways in which women express emotional distress mean that they are more likely to be diagnosed with depression, while men's relative lack of articulacy means their depression is hidden. This may have consequences for communicating with health professionals. The purpose of this analysis was to explore how men and women with depression articulate their emotional distress, and examine whether there are gender differences or similarities in the strategies that respondents found useful when engaging with health professionals.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>In-depth qualitative interviews with 22 women and 16 men in the UK who identified themselves as having had depression, recruited through general practitioners, psychiatrists and support groups.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We found gender similarities and gender differences in our sample. Both men and women found it difficult to recognise and articulate mental health problems and this had consequences for their ability to communicate with health professionals. Key gender differences noted were that men tended to value skills which helped them to talk while women valued listening skills in health professionals, and that men emphasised the importance of getting practical results from talking therapies in their narratives, as opposed to other forms of therapy which they conceptualised as 'just talking'. We also found diversity among women and among men; some respondents valued a close personal relationship with health professionals, while others felt that this personal relationship was a barrier to communication and preferred 'talking to a stranger'.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Our findings suggest that there is not a straightforward relationship between gender and engagement with health professionals for people with depression. Health professionals need to be sensitive to patients who have difficulties in expressing emotional distress and critical of gender stereotypes which suggest that women invariably find it easy to express emotional distress and men invariably find it difficult. In addition it is important to recognise that, for a minority of patients, a personal relationship with health professionals can act as a barrier to the disclosure of emotional distress.</p

Proliferation Index: A Continuous Model to Predict Prognosis in Patients with Tumours of the Ewing's Sarcoma Family

The prognostic value of proliferation index (PI) and apoptotic index (AI), caspase-8, -9 and -10 expression have been investigated in primary Ewing's sarcoma family of tumours (ESFT). Proliferating cells, detected by immunohistochemistry for Ki-67, were identified in 91% (91/100) of tumours with a median PI of 14 (range 0–87). Apoptotic cells, identified using the TUNEL assay, were detected in 96% (76/79) of ESFT; the median AI was 3 (range 0–33). Caspase-8 protein expression was negative (0) in 14% (11/79), low (1) in 33% (26/79), medium (2) in 38% (30/79) and high (3) in 15% (12/79) of tumours, caspase-9 expression was low (1) in 66% (39/59) and high (3) in 34% (20/59), and caspase-10 protein was low (1) in 37% (23/62) and negative (0) in 63% (39/62) of primary ESFT. There was no apparent relationship between caspase-8, -9 and -10 expression, PI and AI. PI was predictive of relapse-free survival (RFS; p = 0.011) and overall survival (OS; p = <0.001) in a continuous model, whereas AI did not predict outcome. Patients with tumours expressing low levels of caspase-9 protein had a trend towards a worse RFS than patients with tumours expressing higher levels of caspase-9 protein (p = 0.054, log rank test), although expression of caspases-8, -9 and/or -10 did not significantly predict RFS or OS. In a multivariate analysis model that included tumour site, tumour volume, the presence of metastatic disease at diagnosis, PI and AI, PI independently predicts OS (p = 0.003). Consistent with previous publications, patients with pelvic tumours had a significantly worse OS than patients with tumours at other sites (p = 0.028); patients with a pelvic tumour and a PI≥20 had a 6 fold-increased risk of death. These studies advocate the evaluation of PI in a risk model of outcome for patients with ESFT

A. Kaplan Meier survival plots comparing the overall and relapse-free survival of patients with a tumour volume ≥200 ml with that of patients with a tumour volume <200 ml, p = 0.019 and 0.0133 respectively; log rank test. Crosses indicate censored events.

<p>B. Kaplan Meier survival plots to compare the overall and relapse-free survival of patients with pelvic tumours to that of patients with tumours at other sites, p = 0.0185 and 0.0088 respectively; log rank test. Crosses indicate censored events.</p

A. Immunohistochemistry for Ki-67 performed on primary ESFT (5 µm).

<p>Ki-67 protein was visualised with the DAB substrate, proliferating cells are identified by Ki-67 positive nuclei (see arrows). Immunohistochemistry performed in the absence of primary antibody was included to control for non-specific binding of the secondary antibody (No primary AB). Magnification ×400. B. TUNEL on primary ESFT (5 µm). Apoptotic cells were identified by TUNEL positive nuclei (see arrows). The TUNEL assay was performed in the absence TdT enzyme to control for non-specific staining (No enzyme). Magnification ×400.</p

Immunohistochemistry on primary ESFT (5 µm) for caspases-8, -9 and -10.

<p>Immunohistochemistry in the absence of primary antibody was to control for non-specific binding of the secondary antibody (No primary AB). Magnification of images = ×400. Caspase expression was scored as negative (0), low (1), medium (2) or high (3). A. Caspase-8 protein expression. B. Caspase-10 protein expression. C. Caspase-9 protein expression.</p