5 research outputs found
Artificial nighttime lighting impacts visual ecology links between flowers, pollinators and predators
This is the final version. Available on open access from Nature Research via the DOI in this recordData availability:
The authors declare that all data supporting the findings of this study, including source data
for figures 2 & 3, are available within the paper's supplementary information files.Code availability:
Full analysis code is available as a supplementary information file.The nighttime environment is being altered rapidly over large areas worldwide through
introduction of artificial lighting, from streetlights and other sources. This is predicted to
impact the visual ecology of many organisms, affecting both their intra- and interspecific
interactions. Here, we show the effects of different artificial light sources on multiple aspects
of hawkmoth visual ecology, including their perception of floral signals for pollination, the
potential for intraspecific sexual signalling, and the effectiveness of their visual defences
against avian predators. Light sources fall into three broad categories: some that prevent use
of chromatic signals for these behaviours, others that more closely mimic natural lighting
conditions, and, finally, types whose effects vary with light intensity and signal colour. We
find that Phosphor Converted (PC) amber LED lighting – often suggested to be less harmful
to nocturnal insects – falls into this third disruptive group, with unpredictable consequences
for insect visual ecology depending on distance from the light source and the colour of the
objects viewed. The diversity of impacts of artificial lighting on hawkmoth visual ecology
alone argues for a nuanced approach to outdoor lighting in environmentally sensitive areas,
employing intensities and spectra designed to limit those effects of most significant concern
Generalist camouflage can be more successful than microhabitat specialisation in natural environments
This is the final version. Available from BMC via the DOI in this record. The data and code supporting this publication are openly available on the
Open Science Framework repository at: https://osf.io/6p2fw/Background: Crypsis by background-matching is a critical form of anti-predator defence for animals exposed to visual predators, but achieving effective camouflage in patchy and variable natural environments is not straightforward. To cope with heterogeneous backgrounds, animals could either specialise on particular microhabitat patches, appearing cryptic in some areas but mismatching others, or adopt a compromise strategy, providing partial matching across different patch types. Existing studies have tested the effectiveness of compromise strategies in only a limited set of circumstances, primarily with small targets varying in pattern, and usually in screen-based tasks. Here, we measured the detection risk associated with different background-matching strategies for relatively large targets, with human observers searching for them in natural scenes, and focusing on colour. Model prey were designed to either ‘specialise’ on the colour of common microhabitat patches, or ‘generalise’ by matching the average colour of the whole visual scenes. Results: In both the field and an equivalent online computer-based search task, targets adopting the generalist strategy were more successful in evading detection than those matching microhabitat patches. This advantage occurred because, across all possible locations in these experiments, targets were typically viewed against a patchwork of different microhabitat areas; the putatively generalist targets were thus more similar on average to their various immediate surroundings than were the specialists. Conclusions: Demonstrating close agreement between the results of field and online search experiments provides useful validation of online citizen science methods commonly used to test principles of camouflage, at least for human observers. In finding a survival benefit to matching the average colour of the visual scenes in our chosen environment, our results highlight the importance of relative scales in determining optimal camouflage strategies, and suggest how compromise coloration can succeed in nature.Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilQineti
Varying benefits of generalist and specialist camouflage in two versus four background environments
This is the author accepted manuscript.Background-matching camouflage is a well-established strategy to reduce detection, but implementing this on heterogeneous backgrounds is challenging. For prey with fixed colour patterns, solutions include specialising on a particular visual microhabitat, or adopting a compromise or generalist appearance, matching multiple backgrounds less well. Existing studies suggest both approaches can succeed, but most consider relatively simple scenarios, where artificial prey appear against two backgrounds differing in a single visual characteristic. Here, we used computer-based search tasks with human participants to test the relative benefits of specialising and generalising for complex targets, displayed on either two or four types of naturalistic backgrounds. Across two background types, specialisation was beneficial on average. However, the success of this strategy varied with search duration, such that generalist targets could outperform specialists over short search durations due to the presence of poorly matched specialists. Over longer searches, the remaining well-matched specialists had greater success than generalists, leading to an overall benefit of specialisation at longer search durations. Against four different backgrounds, the initial cost to specialisation was greater, so specialists and generalists ultimately experienced similar survival. Generalists performed better when their patterning was a compromise between backgrounds that were more similar to each other than when backgrounds were more different, with similarity in luminance more relevant than pattern differences. Time-dependence in the relative success of these strategies suggests that predator search behaviour may affect optimal camouflage in real-world situations.Biotechnology & Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC)Qineti