Conservative versus invasive strategy in elderly patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: insights from the international POPular age registry

This registry assessed the impact of conservative and invasive strategies on major adverse clinical events (MACE) in elderly patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Patients aged ≥75 years with NSTEMI were prospectively registered from European centers and followed up for one year. Outcomes were compared between conservative and invasive groups in the overall population and a propensity score-matched (PSM) cohort. MACE included cardiovascular death, acute coronary syndrome, and stroke. The study included 1190 patients (median age 80 years, 43% female). CAG was performed in 67% (N = 798), with two-thirds undergoing revascularization. Conservatively treated patients had higher baseline risk. After propensity score matching, 319 patient pairs were successfully matched. MACE occurred more frequently in the conservative group (total population 20% vs. 12%, adjHR 0.53, 95% CI 0.37–0.77, p = 0.001), remaining significant in the PSM cohort (18% vs. 12%, adjHR 0.50, 95% CI 0.31–0.81, p = 0.004). In conclusion, an early invasive strategy was associated with benefits over conservative management in elderly patients with NSTEMI. Risk factors associated with ischemia and bleeding should guide strategy selection rather than solely relying on age

Towards a noninvasive anatomical and functional diagnostic work-up of patients with suspected coronary artery disease

Combining multidetector computed tomography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging provides the clinician a strategy to comprehensively evaluate coronary morphology and function noninvasively. In the MARCC trial (Magnetic Resonance and CT in suspected CAD) a new noninvasive diagnostic work-up for patients with suspected coronary artery disease will be developed, involving the sequential use of both imaging techniques. (Neth Heart J 2010;18:270–3.

Positive predictive value of computed tomography coronary angiography in clinical practice

Background: Several studies have investigated the diagnostic performance of computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) for the detection of significant coronary artery disease (CAD). These studies were performed in patients that were already referred for invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and prevalence of significant CAD was high. Although the negative predictive value of CTCA was consistently high, a wide range of positive predictive values (PPVs) was reported. Thus, the PPV of CTCA in patients that undergo CTCA as part of a clinical diagnostic evaluation remains unclear. This study investigated the PPV of CTCA for the detection of significant CAD in clinical practice. Methods: A total of 181 patients with low to intermediate pre-test probability CAD that were referred for non-invasive evaluation of chest pain underwent 64-slice CTCA. CTCA was scored per segment as normal, non-obstructive CAD or obstructive CAD (> 50% diameter stenosis). All patients with obstructive CAD according to CTCA, underwent ICA. Significant CAD was defined as > 50% diameter stenosis on ICA. Results: According to CTCA, 65 (35.9%) patients had obstructive CAD. In 26 (14.4%) patients, significant CAD was found by ICA. The PPV for detection of significant CAD per patient, per vessel and per segment were 40.0% (26/65, 95% CI: 30.6-50.2%), 31.3% (36/115, 95% CI: 24.7-38.8%) and 25.5% (42/165; 95% CI: 20.3-31.4%), respectively. Conclusions: The PPV of CTCA for detection of significant CAD in patients with low to intermediate probability CAD that are clinically referred for non-invasive evaluation of chest pain is markedly lower than generally reported. © 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved

Timing of revascularization in patients with transient ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a randomized clinical trial

Aims: Patients with acute coronary syndrome who present initially with ST-elevation on the electrocardiogram but, subsequently, show complete normalization of the ST-segment and relief of symptoms before reperfusion therapy are referred to as transient ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and pose a therapeutic challenge. It is unclear what the optimal timing of revascularization is for these patients and whether they should be treated with a STEMI-like or a non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI)-like invasive approach. The aim of the study is to determine the effect of an immediate vs. a delayed invasive strategy on infarct size measured by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR). Methods and results: In a randomized clinical trial, 142 patients with transient STEMI with symptoms of any duration were randomized to an immediate (STEMI-like) [0.3 h; interquartile range (IQR) 0.2-0.7 h] or a delayed (NSTEMI-like) invasive strategy (22.7 h; IQR 18.2-27.3 h). Infarct size as percentage of the left ventricular myocardial mass measured by CMR at day four was generally small and not different between the immediate and the delayed invasive group (1.3%; IQR 0.0-3.5% vs. 1.5% IQR 0.0-4.1%, P = 0.48). By intention to treat, there was no difference in major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as death, reinfarction, or target vessel revascularization at 30 days (2.9% vs. 2.8%, P = 1.00). However, four additional patients (5.6%) in the delayed invasive strategy required urgent intervention due to signs and symptoms of reinfarction while awaiting angiography. Conclusion: Overall, infarct size in transient STEMI is small and is not influenced by an immediate or delayed invasive strategy. In addition, short-term MACE was low and not different between the treatment groups