22 research outputs found
A low-volume polyethylene glycol solution was associated with an increased suboptimal bowel preparation rate but had similar recommendations for an early repeat colonoscopy, procedure times, and adenoma detection rates.
BACKGROUND/AIMS:Low-volume polyethylene glycol (PEG) bowel preparations are better tolerated by patients than high-volume preparations and may achieve similar preparation quality. However, there is little data comparing their effects on a recommendation for an early repeat colonoscopy (because of a suboptimal preparation), procedure times, adenoma detection rate (ADR), and advanced adenoma detection rate (AADR). METHODS:This is a retrospective cohort study of outpatient colonoscopies performed during a one-year period at a single academic medical center in which low-volume MoviPrepĀ® (n = 1841) or high-volume ColyteĀ® (n = 1337) was used. All preparations were split-dosed. Appropriate covariates were included in regression models assessing suboptimal preparation quality (fair, poor, or inadequate), procedure times, recommendation for an early repeat colonoscopy, ADR, and AADR. RESULTS:MoviPrepĀ® was associated with an increase in having a suboptimal bowel preparation (OR 1.36; 95% CI: 1.06-1.76), but it was not associated with differences in insertion (p = 0.43), withdrawal (p = 0.22), or total procedure times (p = 0.10). The adjusted percentage with a suboptimal preparation was 11.7% for patients using MoviPrepĀ® and 8.8% for patients using ColyteĀ®. MoviPrepĀ® was not associated with a significant difference in overall ADR (OR 0.93; 95% CI: 0.78-1.11), AADR (OR 1.18; 95% CI: 0.87-1.62), or recommendation for early repeat colonoscopy (OR 1.16; 95% CI: 0.72-1.88). CONCLUSIONS:MoviPrepĀ® was associated with a small absolute increase in having a suboptimal preparation, but did not affect recommendations for an early repeat colonoscopy, procedure times, or adenoma detection rates. Mechanisms to reduce financial barriers limiting low-volume preparations should be considered because of their favorable tolerability profile
Medicare Under Age 65 and Medicaid Patients Have Poorer Bowel Preparations: Implications for Recommendations for an Early Repeat Colonoscopy
Colonoscopy is performed on patients across a broad spectrum of demographic characteristics. These characteristics may aggregate by patient insurance provider and influencebowel preparation quality and the prevalence of adenomas. The purpose of this study wasto evaluate the association of insurance status and suboptimal bowel preparation, recommendation for an early repeat colonoscopy due to suboptimal bowel preparation, adenomadetection rate (ADR), and advanced ADR (AADR)
A Higher Percentage<sup>ā”</sup> of Medicare Under 65 Patients had at Least One Advanced Adenoma.
<p>A Higher Percentage<sup>ā”</sup> of Medicare Under 65 Patients had at Least One Advanced Adenoma.</p
A Higher Percentage<sup>ā”</sup> of Medicare Under 65 Patients had at least One Adenoma.
<p>A Higher Percentage<sup>ā”</sup> of Medicare Under 65 Patients had at least One Adenoma.</p
A Higher Percentage<sup>ā”</sup> of Medicare Patients Under 65 and Medicaid/CICP/Self-Pay Patients Received a Recommendation for an Early Repeat Colonoscopy.
<p>A Higher Percentage<sup>ā”</sup> of Medicare Patients Under 65 and Medicaid/CICP/Self-Pay Patients Received a Recommendation for an Early Repeat Colonoscopy.</p