Diverse parameters of ambulatory knee moments differ with medial knee osteoarthritis severity and are combinable into a severity index

Objective: To characterize ambulatory knee moments with respect to medial knee osteoarthritis (OA) severity comprehensively and to assess the possibility of developing a severity index combining knee moment parameters.Methods: Nine parameters (peak amplitudes) commonly used to quantify three-dimensional knee moments during walking were analyzed for 98 individuals (58.7 ± 9.2 years old, 1.69 ± 0.09 m, 76.9 ± 14.5 kg, 56% female), corresponding to three medial knee osteoarthritis severity groups: non-osteoarthritis (n = 22), mild osteoarthritis (n = 38) and severe osteoarthritis (n = 38). Multinomial logistic regression was used to create a severity index. Comparison and regression analyses were performed with respect to disease severity.Results: Six of the nine moment parameters differed statistically significantly among severity groups (p ≤ 0.039) and five reported statistically significant correlation with disease severity (0.23 ≤ |r| ≤ 0.59). The proposed severity index was highly reliable (ICC = 0.96) and statistically significantly different between the three groups (p < 0.001) as well as correlated with disease severity (r = 0.70).Conclusion: While medial knee osteoarthritis research has mostly focused on a few knee moment parameters, this study showed that other parameters differ with disease severity. In particular, it shed light on three parameters frequently disregarded in prior works. Another important finding is the possibility of combining the parameters into a severity index, which opens promising perspectives based on a single figure assessing the knee moments in their entirety. Although the proposed index was shown to be reliable and associated with disease severity, further research will be necessary particularly to assess its validity

Heightened clinical utility of smartphone versus body-worn inertial system for shoulder function B-B score

Background The B-B Score is a straightforward kinematic shoulder function score including only two movements (hand to the Back + lift hand as to change a Bulb) that demonstrated sound measurement properties for patients for various shoulder pathologies. However, the B-B Score results using a smartphone or a reference system have not yet been compared. Provided that the measurement properties are comparable, the use of a smartphone would offer substantial practical advantages. This study investigated the concurrent validity of a smartphone and a reference inertial system for the measurement of the kinematic shoulder function B-B Score. Methods Sixty-five patients with shoulder conditions (with rotator cuff conditions, adhesive capsulitis and proximal humerus fracture) and 20 healthy participants were evaluated using a smartphone and a reference inertial system. Measurements were performed twice, alternating between two evaluators. The B-B Score differences between groups, differences between devices, relationship between devices, intra- and inter-evaluator reproducibility were analysed. Results The smartphone mean scores (SD) were 94.1 (11.1) for controls and 54.1 (18.3) for patients (P < 0.01). The difference between devices was non-significant for the control (P = 0.16) and the patient group (P = 0.81). The analysis of the relationship between devices showed 0.97 ICC, -0.6 bias and -13.2 to 12.0 limits of agreement (LOA). The smartphone intra-evaluator ICC was 0.92, the bias 1.5 and the LOA -17.4 to 20.3. The smartphone inter-evaluator ICC was 0.92, the bias 1.5 and the LOA -16.9 to 20.0. Conclusions The B-B Score results measured with a smartphone were comparable to those of an inertial system. While single measurements diverged in some cases, the intra- and inter-evaluator reproducibility was excellent and was equivalent between devices. The B-B score measured with a smartphone is straightforward and as efficient as a reference inertial system measurement.sch_phy12pub4727pub

Gonarthrose et prothèse totale de genou chez les patients âgés : la plupart des prothèses dureront plus de 15 ans

Depuis plus de 30 ans, la prothèse totale de genou est une solution fréquemment proposée aux patients présentant une arthrose de genou avancée pour laquelle les traitements conservateurs, à but symptomatique, sont dépassés. Cette intervention, désormais bien maîtrisée, permet d'obtenir des résultats fi ables. Les questions, récurrentes et légitimes de la part d'un(e) futur(e) opéré(e), concernent principalement la longévité de l'implant, la récupération fonctionnelle et l'amélioration de sa qualité de vie altérée par les symptômes. Naturellement, la charge pondérale, l'activité du patient ainsi que les propriétés mécaniques et les choix liés à la prothèse (fi xation des implants avec ou sans ciment, conservation ou non des ligaments croisés, utilisation de plateau mobile ou fi xe, resurfaçage ou non de la rotule) sont tous des facteurs déterminants dans le succès thérapeutique

Between/within-session reliability of spinal kinematic and lumbar muscle activity measures in patients with chronic low back pain and asymptomatic individuals

Background : Longitudinal research is required to better understand the role of spinal movement alterations in chronic low back pain (CLBP). To this end, it is critical to assess the between-session reliability of spinal movement measures. Research question : What is the within/between-session reliability of spinal movement measures in patients with CLBP and asymptomatic controls? Methods : Spinal movement was recorded prospectively during two sessions, a week apart, for 20 patients with CLBP (60% male; 40.0 ± 12.3 years old) and 20 asymptomatic individuals (55% male; 38.2 ± 10.9 years old). Sagittal-plane angular amplitude and angular velocity at the lower lumbar, upper lumbar, lower thoracic and upper thoracic joints, as well as maximal erector spinae activity were measured during five daily-activity tasks. In addition, task-independent measures were obtained by averaging the measures across tasks. The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC 2,1) and the minimal detectable change (MDC) were calculated. Pearson correlation was used to compare task-independent and task-specific measures. Results : Between-session ICCs in patients with CLBP were mostly moderate to good for maximal angular amplitude and erector spinae activity measures. Lower ICCs were observed for range of angular motion and angular velocity measures (42% of ICCs < 0.5). Median MDCs were 9.6°, 18.3°/s and 1.0% for angular amplitude, angular velocity and erector spinae activity measures, respectively. The reliability of task-independent and task-specific measures was strongly correlated (r = 0.91, p < 0.001). Significance : Sagittal-plane maximal angular amplitude and erector spinae activity measures during various daily-activity tasks demonstrated mostly moderate to good between-session ICCs. However, relatively large MDCs suggested that important changes are needed to be detectable. Task-independent measures reported similarly acceptable ICCs than task-specific measures, supporting their use to describe spinal movement

Slowing gait during turning: how volition of modifying walking speed affects the gait pattern in healthy adults

BackgroundTurning during walking and volitionally modulating walking speed introduces complexity to gait and has been minimally explored.Research questionHow do the spatiotemporal parameters vary between young adults walking at a normal speed and a slower speed while making 90°, 180°, and 360° turns?MethodsIn a laboratory setting, the spatiotemporal parameters of 10 young adults were documented as they made turns at 90°, 180°, and 360°. A generalized linear model was utilized to determine the effect of both walking speed and turning amplitude.ResultsYoung adults volitionally reducing their walking speed while turning at different turning amplitudes significantly decreased their cadence and spatial parameters while increasing their temporal parameters. In conditions of slower movement, the variability of certain spatial parameters decreased, while the variability of some temporal parameters increased.SignificanceThis research broadens the understanding of turning biomechanics in relation to volitionally reducing walking speed. Cadence might be a pace gait constant synchronizing the rhythmic integration of several inputs to coordinate an ordered gait pattern output. Volition might up-regulate or down-regulate this pace gait constant (i.e., cadence) which creates the feeling of modulating walking speed

Chronic low back pain patients walk with locally altered spinal kinematics

Various studies have reported alterations of spinal kinematics in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) during gait. However, while recent findings stressed the importance of multi-segment analysis, most of prior gait studies modelled the lumbar spine as one segment, when it was not the entire trunk that was considered as a single segment. Therefore, there is a need for comprehensive multi-segment research that could improve our understanding of CLBP pathomechanism and thus possibly contribute to better care for CLBP. This study aimed at characterizing the angle patterns at the lower lumbar (LLS), upper lumbar (ULS), lower thoracic (LTS) and upper thoracic (UTS) joints in the three anatomical planes and at comparing CLBP patients and asymptomatic subjects. Spinal kinematics of 11 CLBP patients and 11 controls was measured using a marker-based motion capture system and described according to a previously proposed multi-segment biomechanical model. Characteristic patterns were observed at the UTS, LTS and ULS joints in the transverse plane and at the UTS, ULS and LLS joints in the frontal plane. CLBP patients walked with smaller frontal-plane LLS range of motion than controls. The results also suggested that patients had more asymmetrical LTS motion in the transverse plane. In conclusion, this work extended prior literature by showing specific CLBP-related alterations in multi-segment spinal kinematics during gait. Further research is necessary to understand the factors influencing kinematics alterations and how treatment strategies might improve motor behaviour in CLBP patients

Patients with chronic low back pain have an individual movement signature ::a comparison of angular amplitude, angular velocity and muscle activity across multiple functional tasks

Despite a large body of evidence demonstrating spinal movement alterations in individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP), there is still a lack of understanding of the role of spinal movement behavior on LBP symptoms development or recovery. One reason for this may be that spinal movement has been studied during various functional tasks without knowing if the tasks are interchangeable, limiting data consolidation steps. The first objective of this cross-sectional study was to analyze the influence of the functional tasks on the information carried by spinal movement measures. To this end, we first analyzed the relationships in spinal movement between various functional tasks in patients with CLBP using Pearson correlations. Second, we compared the performance of spinal movement measures to differentiate patients with CLBP from asymptomatic controls among tasks. The second objective of the study was to develop task-independent measures of spinal movement and determine the construct validity of the approach. Five functional tasks primarily involving sagittal-plane movement were recorded for 52 patients with CLBP and 20 asymptomatic controls. Twelve measures were used to describe the sagittal-plane angular amplitude and velocity at the lower and upper lumbar spine as well as the activity of the erector spinae. Correlations between tasks were statistically significant in 91 out of 99 cases (0.31 ≤ r ≤ 0.96, all p < 0.05). The area under the curve (AUC) to differentiate groups did not differ substantially between tasks in most of the comparisons (82% had a difference in AUC of ≤0.1). The task-independent measures of spinal movement demonstrated equivalent or higher performance to differentiate groups than functional tasks alone. In conclusion, these findings support the existence of an individual spinal movement signature in patients with CLBP, and a limited influence of the tasks on the information carried by the movement measures, at least for the twelve common sagittal-plane measures analysed in this study. Therefore, this work brought critical insight for the interpretation of data in literature reporting differing tasks and for the design of future studies. The results also supported the construct validity of task-independent measures of spinal movement and encouraged its consideration in the future