Social cognition approach to reporting chronic conditions in health surveys

[by Marilynn B. Brewer, Valerie T. Dull, and Jared B. Jobe]."This research was a part of a larger project entitled "Laboratory-based Research on the Cognitive Aspects of Survey Methodology" being conducted by the National Center for Health Statistics under a grant #SES 84-03415 from the National Science Foundation."--T.p. verso."October 1989.""DHHS contract no. 282-2123."Bibliography: p. 13

Summer Institute in Political Psychology (SIPP)

The University Archives has determined that this item is of continuing value to OSU's history.For the past twelve years, the Ohio State University has organized a Summer Institute in Political Psychology (SIPP) in conjunction with the International Society of Political Psychology. Each morning, a member of SIPP’s guest faculty will present his or her current research. This is not necessarily just a lecture; it is an opportunity to learn about ongoing study in political psychology, learn cutting-edge methodologies and explore substantive and professional issues in this work. Each session allows for Q and A and substantial intellectual exchanges among faulty and students.Mershon Center for International Security StudiesInternational Society of Political Psychologyevent webpag

The Human Dilemma: Being the Same and Different at the Same Time

The University Archives has determined that this item is of continuing value to OSU's history.Human social behavior presents us with a paradox. On the one hand, we assert our individuality, long to stand out from the crowd, and resist being “pigeon-holed” based on roles or stereotypes. On the other hand, we proudly wear our school colors, cringe with embarrassment if we are out of fashion, and seek to belong and “fit in.” If we are categorized as members of large, inclusive social groups, we speak of “losing our identity”; but if others fail to recognize or validate our group memberships, we speak of “losing our identity.” According to a theory of optimal distinctiveness, such apparent contradictions reflect adaptive mechanisms that bind human beings together in social groups. The theory posits that humans are characterized by two opposing social needs. The first is a need for assimilation and inclusion, a desire for belonging that motivates immersion in social groups. The second is a need for differentiation from others that operates in opposition to the need for immersion. Opposing motives hold each other in check, with the result that human beings are not comfortable either in isolation or in huge collectives and instead gravitate to social groups that are both bounded and distinctive. These motives underlie group loyalty, cooperation, and trust, but at the same time lay the groundwork for inter-group distrust and conflict. Research in the laboratory and the real world documents both the constructive and destructive consequences of us-them distinctions and leads us to explore the important question of whether humans can reap the benefits of group belonging without the costs of exclusion.Introduction by Barbara Snyder, Executive Vice-President and Provost of The Ohio State University (00:00:00-00:02:44) -- Introduction by Karen Holbrook, President of The Ohio State University (00:02:45-00:05:58) -- Presentation (00:05:59-00:54:05) -- Questions (00:54:06-01:23:26