3,044 research outputs found
A review of studies mapping (or cross walking) from non-preference based measures of health to generic preference-based measures
This paper presents a systematic review of current practice in mapping between nonpreference based measures and generic preference-based measures. It reviews the studies identified by a systematic search of the published literature and the grey literature. This review seeks to address the feasibility and overall validity of this approach, the circumstances when it should be considered and to bring together any lessons for future mapping studies
A review of studies mapping (or cross walking) from non-preference based measures of health to generic preference-based measures
This paper presents a systematic review of current practice in mapping between nonpreference based measures and generic preference-based measures. It reviews the studies identified by a systematic search of the published literature and the grey literature. This review seeks to address the feasibility and overall validity of this approach, the circumstances when it should be considered and to bring together any lessons for future mapping studies.mapping; cross walking; preference-based measures; QALYs
A review of studies mapping (or cross walking) from non-preference based measures of health to generic preference-based measures
A comparison of United States and United Kingdom EQ-5D health states valuations using a nonparametric Bayesian method
Few studies have compared preference values of health states obtained in different countries. This paper applies a nonparametric model to estimate and compare EQ-5D health state valuation data obtained from two countries using Bayesian methods. The data set is the US and UK EQ-5D valuation studies where a sample of 42 states defined by the EQ-5D was valued by representative samples of the general population from each country using the time trade-off technique. We estimate a function applicable across both countries which explicitly accounts for the differences between them, and is estimated using the data from both countries. The paper discusses the implications of these results for future applications of the EQ-5D and further work in this field.preference-based health measure; nonparametric methods; time trade-off; EQ-5D
Using Rasch analysis to form plausible health states amenable to valuation: the development of CORE-6D from CORE-OM in order to elicit preferences for common mental health problems
Purpose: To describe a new approach for deriving a preference-based index from a condition specific measure that uses Rasch analysis to develop health states.
Methods: CORE-OM is a 34-item instrument monitoring clinical outcomes of people with common mental health problems. CORE-OM is characterised by high correlation across its domains. Rasch analysis was used to reduce the number of items and response levels in order to produce a set of unidimensionally-behaving items, and to generate a credible set of health states corresponding to different levels of symptom severity using the Rasch item threshold map.
Results: The proposed methodology resulted in the development of CORE-6D, a 2-dimensional health state description system consisting of a unidimensionally-behaving 5-item emotional component and a physical symptom item. Inspection of the Rasch item threshold map of the emotional component helped identify a set of 11 plausible health states, which, combined with the physical symptom item levels, will be used for the valuation of the instrument, resulting in the development of a preference-based index.
Conclusions: This is a useful new approach to develop preference-based measures where the domains of a measure are characterised by high correlation. The CORE-6D preference-based index will enable calculation of Quality Adjusted Life Years in people with common mental health problems
A comparison of the EQ-5D and the SF-6D across seven patient groups
As the number of preference-based instruments grows, it becomes increasingly important to compare different
preference-based measures of health in order to inform an important debate on the choice of instrument. This paper
presents a comparison of two of them, the EQ-5D and the SF-6D (recently developed from the SF-36) across seven
patient/population groups (chronic obstructive airways disease, osteoarthritis, irritable bowel syndrome, lower back
pain, leg ulcers, post menopausal women and elderly). The mean SF-6D index value was found to exceed the EQ-5D
by 0.045 and the intraclass correlation coefficient between them was 0.51. Whilst this convergence lends some
support for the validity of these measures, the modest difference at the aggregate level masks more significant
differences in agreement across the patient groups and over severity of illness, with the SF-6D having a smaller range
and lower variance in values. There is evidence for floor effects in the SF-6D and ceiling effects in the EQ-5D. These
discrepancies arise from differences in their health state classifications and the methods used to value them. Further
research is required to fully understand the respective roles of the descriptive systems and the valuation methods and
to examine the implications for estimates of the impact of health care interventions
Common scale valuations across different preference-based measures: estimation using rank data
Background: Different preference-based measures (PBMs) used to estimate Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) provide di¤erent utility values for the same patient. Differences are expected since values have been obtained using different samples, valuation techniques and descriptive systems. Previous studies have estimated the relationship between pairs of PBMs using patient self-reported data. However, there is a need for an approach capable of generating values directly on a common scale for a range of PBMs using the same sample of general population respondents and valuation technique but keeping the advantages of the different descriptive systems.
Methods: General public survey data (n=501) where respondents ranked health states described using subsets of six PBMs were analysed. We develop a new model based on the mixed logit to overcome two key limitations of the standard rank ordered logit model, namely, the unrealistic choice pattern (Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives) and the independence of repeated observations.
Results: There are substantial differences in the estimated parameters between the two models (mean di¤erence 0.07) leading to di¤erent orderings across the measures. Estimated values for the best states described by di¤erent PBMs are substantially and significantly di¤erent using the standard model, unlike our approach which yields more consistent results.
Limitations: Data come from a exploratory study that is relatively small both in sample size and coverage of health states.
Conclusions: This study develops a new, �exible econometric model specifically designed to reflect appropriately the features of rank data. Results support the view that the standard model is not appropriate in this setting and will yield very different and apparently inconsistent results. PBMs can be compared using a common scale by implementation of this new approach
Efficiency, equity, and NICE clinical guidelines
The stated purpose of clinical guidelines from the United Kingdom's National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) is to "help healthcare professionals and patients make the right decisions about healthcare in specific clinical circumstances." However, what constitutes "the right decisions" depends on your point of view. For individual patients the right decision is that which maximises their wellbeing, and this is properly the concern of the clinician. Yet in resource constrained healthcare systems this will not always coincide with the right decisions for patients in general or society as a whole, thereby leading to some understandable tensions. NICE is a national policy making body whose responsibility is clearly broader than the individual patient. This wider viewpoint is reflected in NICE's technology appraisals by the central role afforded to cost effectiveness. We argue that the methods currently used by the NICE clinical guideline programme confuse these two viewpoints
Evolution of the SPS Power Converter Controls towards the LHC Era
By the end of the nineties, the power converter control system (Mugef) of the
CERN proton accelerator (SPS) had undergone a complete modernization. This
resulted in newly developed hardware for function generation, measurement and
I/O in a VME environment, under the LynxOS real-time operating system. This has
provided a platform on which extensions can be developed for future operation
in the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) era. This paper describes some of these
extensions, in particular a fast Surveillance and Interlock system for
monitoring the power converter output currents. This will be mandatory for the
safe operation of the SPS transfer lines TI2 & TI8 to LHC and for similar
applications in the future. The strategies employed to cope with various
failure modes of the power converters and the timely activation of the
interlock are outlined. The new SPS controls infrastructure now under
development, will give rise to new modes of operation for the Mugef systems.
Integration with the proposed middleware must be undertaken in a structured
evolution, while retaining compatibility with the current usage.Comment: Paper is 3 pages for ICAPEPCS 01 27 - 30 November 2001 San Jose. John
C L Brazier is the principal author and a consultant to CERN (hence the CERN
Email address but UK Organisation
- …