828 research outputs found
Using Rasch analysis to form plausible health states amenable to valuation: the development of CORE-6D from CORE-OM in order to elicit preferences for common mental health problems
Purpose: To describe a new approach for deriving a preference-based index from a condition specific measure that uses Rasch analysis to develop health states.
Methods: CORE-OM is a 34-item instrument monitoring clinical outcomes of people with common mental health problems. CORE-OM is characterised by high correlation across its domains. Rasch analysis was used to reduce the number of items and response levels in order to produce a set of unidimensionally-behaving items, and to generate a credible set of health states corresponding to different levels of symptom severity using the Rasch item threshold map.
Results: The proposed methodology resulted in the development of CORE-6D, a 2-dimensional health state description system consisting of a unidimensionally-behaving 5-item emotional component and a physical symptom item. Inspection of the Rasch item threshold map of the emotional component helped identify a set of 11 plausible health states, which, combined with the physical symptom item levels, will be used for the valuation of the instrument, resulting in the development of a preference-based index.
Conclusions: This is a useful new approach to develop preference-based measures where the domains of a measure are characterised by high correlation. The CORE-6D preference-based index will enable calculation of Quality Adjusted Life Years in people with common mental health problems
Estimating a preference-based index from the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation - Outcome Measure (CORE-OM): valuation of CORE-6D
Background: The Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation - Outcome Measure (CORE-OM) is used to evaluate the effectiveness of psychological therapies in people with common mental disorders. The objective of this study was to estimate a preference-based index for this population using CORE-6D, a health state classification system derived from CORE-OM consisting of a 5-item emotional component and a physical item, and to demonstrate a novel method for generating states that are not orthogonal.
Methods: Rasch analysis was used to identify 11 plausible āemotionalā health states from CORE-6D (rather than conventional statistical design that would generate implausible states). By combining these with the 3 response levels of the physical item of CORE-6D, 33 plausible health states can be described, of which 18 were selected for valuation. An interview valuation survey of 220 members of public in South Yorkshire, UK, was undertaken using the time-trade-off method to value the 18 health states; regression analysis was subsequently used to predict values for all possible states described by CORE-6D.
Results: A number of multivariate regression models were built to predict values for the 33 plausible health states of CORE-6D, using the Rasch logit value of the emotional health state and the response level of the physical item as independent variables. A cubic model with high predictive value (adjusted R squared 0.990) was finally selected, which can be used to predict utility values for all 927 states described by CORE-6D.
Conclusion: The CORE-6D preference-based index will enable the assessment of cost-effectiveness of interventions for people with common mental disorders using existing and prospective CORE-OM datasets. The new method for generating states may be useful for other instruments with highly correlated dimensions
Using Rasch analysis to form plausible health states amenable to valuation: the development of CORE-6D from CORE-OM in order to elicit preferences for common mental health problems
Purpose: To describe a new approach for deriving a preference-based index from a condition specific measure that uses Rasch analysis to develop health states. Methods: CORE-OM is a 34-item instrument monitoring clinical outcomes of people with common mental health problems. CORE-OM is characterised by high correlation across its domains. Rasch analysis was used to reduce the number of items and response levels in order to produce a set of unidimensionally-behaving items, and to generate a credible set of health states corresponding to different levels of symptom severity using the Rasch item threshold map. Results: The proposed methodology resulted in the development of CORE-6D, a 2-dimensional health state description system consisting of a unidimensionally-behaving 5-item emotional component and a physical symptom item. Inspection of the Rasch item threshold map of the emotional component helped identify a set of 11 plausible health states, which, combined with the physical symptom item levels, will be used for the valuation of the instrument, resulting in the development of a preference-based index. Conclusions: This is a useful new approach to develop preference-based measures where the domains of a measure are characterised by high correlation. The CORE-6D preference-based index will enable calculation of quality adjusted life years in people with common mental health problems.Rasch analysis; health-related quality of life; condition-specific measure; preference-based health; health states; CORE-6D; CORE-OM; mental health; quality-adjusted life years
Estimating a preference-based index from the clinical outcomes in routine evaluation-outcome measure (CORE-OM): Valuation of CORE-6D
Background. The Clinical Outcomes in Routine EvaluationāOutcome Measure (CORE-OM) is used to evaluate the effectiveness of psychological therapies in people with common mental disorders. The objective of this study was to estimate a preference-based index for this population using CORE-6D, a health state classification system derived from the CORE-OM consisting of a 5-item emotional component and a physical item, and to demonstrate a novel method for generating states that are not orthogonal. Methods. Rasch analysis was used to identify 11 emotional health states from CORE-6D that were frequently observed in the study population and are, thus, plausible (in contrast, conventional statistical design might generate implausible states). Combined with the 3 response levels of the physical item of CORE-6D, they generate 33 plausible health states, 18 of which were selected for valuation. A valuation survey of 220 members of the public in South Yorkshire, United Kingdom, was undertaken using the time tradeoff (TTO) method. Regression analysis was subsequently used to predict values for all possible states described by CORE-6D. Results. A number of multivariate regression models were built to predict values for the 33 health states of CORE-6D, using the Rasch logit value of the emotional state and the response level of the physical item as independent variables. A cubic model with high predictive value (adjusted R2 = 0.990) was selected to predict TTO values for all 729 CORE-6D health states. Conclusion. The CORE-6D preference-based index will enable the assessment of cost-effectiveness of interventions for people with common mental disorders using existing and prospective CORE-OM data sets. The new method for generating states may be useful for other instruments with highly correlated dimensions
Recommended from our members
An efficient and rapid microwave-assisted synthesis of 1-acetyl-1H-indol-3-YL acetates
An efficient and rapid synthesis of 1-acetyl-1H-indol-3-yl acetate 1 and its derivatives 7 via the microwave-assisted cyclisation and decarboxylation of 2-[(carboxymethyl)amino]benzoic acids 5 is described. The latter were left to react with acetic anhydride using triethylamine as the base and were subjected to microwave irradiation for 1 minute, at 80 Ā°C with initial power of 300 W. The target 1-acetyl-1H-indol-3-yl acetate 1 and derivatives 7 were isolated in 34-71% yield. In particular, synthesis of 1-acetyl-6-(trifluoromethyl)-1H-indol-3-yl acetate 7f and 1-acetyl-3-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl acetate 7h is reported for the first time
Using Rasch analysis to form plausible health states amenable to valuation: the development of CORE-6D from CORE-OM in order to elicit preferences for common mental health problems
Purpose: To describe a new approach for deriving a preference-based index from a condition specific measure that uses Rasch analysis to develop health states.
Methods: CORE-OM is a 34-item instrument monitoring clinical outcomes of people with common mental health problems. CORE-OM is characterised by high correlation across its domains. Rasch analysis was used to reduce the number of items and response levels in order to produce a set of unidimensionally-behaving items, and to generate a credible set of health states corresponding to different levels of symptom severity using the Rasch item threshold map.
Results: The proposed methodology resulted in the development of CORE-6D, a 2-dimensional health state description system consisting of a unidimensionally-behaving 5-item emotional component and a physical symptom item. Inspection of the Rasch item threshold map of the emotional component helped identify a set of 11 plausible health states, which, combined with the physical symptom item levels, will be used for the valuation of the instrument, resulting in the development of a preference-based index.
Conclusions: This is a useful new approach to develop preference-based measures where the domains of a measure are characterised by high correlation. The CORE-6D preference-based index will enable calculation of quality adjusted life years in people with common mental health problems
A study of geographical distribution of geomagnetic micropulsations Final report
Geographical distributions of geomagnetic micropulsations continuously recorded on frequency modulated magnetic tap
Development of a self-report measure of capability wellbeing for adults: the ICECAP-A
Purpose The benefits of health and social care are not confined to patient health alone and therefore broader measures of wellbeing may be useful for economic evaluation.\ud
This paper reports the development of a simple measure of capability wellbeing for adults (ICECAP-A).\ud
Methods In-depth, informant-led, interviews to identify the attributes of capability wellbeing were conducted with 36 adults in the UK. Eighteen semi-structured, repeat interviews were carried out to develop a capability-based descriptive system for the measure. Informants were purposively selected to ensure variation in socio-economic status, age, sex, ethnicity and health. Data analysis was carried out inductively and iteratively alongside interviews, and findings were used to shape the questions in later interviews.\ud
Results Five over-arching attributes of capability wellbeing were identified for the measure: āāstabilityāā,āāattachmentāā, āāachievementāā, āāautonomyāā and āāenjoymentāā. One item, with four response categories, was developed for each attribute for the ICECAP-A descriptive system.\ud
Conclusions The ICECAP-A capability measure represents a departure from traditional health economics outcome measures, by treating health status as an influence over broader attributes of capability wellbeing. Further work is required to value and validate the attributes and test the sensitivity of the ICECAP-A to healthcare interventions
An investigation of the construct validity of the ICECAP-A capability measure
Abstract
Purpose To investigate the construct validity of the
ICECAP-A capability wellbeing measure.
Methods A face-to-face interview-administered survey
was conducted with 418 members of the UK general
population, randomly sampled from the Postcode Address
File. Pre-specified hypotheses were developed about the
expected associations between individualsā ICECAP-A
responses and their socio-economic circumstances, health
and freedom. The hypotheses were investigated using statistical
tests of association.
Results The ICECAP-A responses and scores reflected
differences across different health and socioeconomic
groups as anticipated, but did not distinguish individuals by
the level of local deprivation. Mean ICECAP-A scores
reflected individualsā perceived freedom slightly more
closely than did measures of health and happiness.
Conclusion This study suggests that the ICECAP-A
measure can identify expected differences in capability
wellbeing in a general population sample. Further work
could establish whether self-reported capabilities exhibit
desirable validity and acceptability in sub-groups of the
population such as patients, social care recipients and
informal carers
Measuring the burden of schizophrenia using clinician and patient-reported measures: an exploratory analysis of construct validity
BACKGROUND: Various self-reported or clinician-reported (as a proxy) measures exist to quantify the burden of schizophrenia on patients. Evidence of the psychometric relationship between these measures to inform their practical use is limited. OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to conduct an exploratory analysis of the construct validity of patient-reported (EQ-5D, SF-6D, WEMWBS, SQLS subscales of Psychosocial, Motivation, Symptoms) versus clinician-reported measures (PANSS, CGI-SCH, NSA-4, HoNOS-PbR) to inform future use of patient-reported measures for burden-of-illness assessment and/or economic evaluation. METHODS: In an adult patient population with schizophrenia, construct validity was assessed in relation to convergent and known-group validity. Convergent validity was assessed using Spearman's rank absolute correlation strength (ACS: weakĀ ā¤Ā 0.3, moderateĀ =Ā 0.3Ā <Ā 0.5, strongĀ ā„Ā 0.5) and graphically using locally weighted scatterplot smoothing (LOWESS) techniques. Known-group validity was assessed using Cohen's d absolute effect size (AES: smallĀ ā¤Ā 0.5, moderateĀ =Ā 0.5Ā <Ā 0.8, largeĀ ā„Ā 0.8). Floor and ceiling effects were assessed as a proxy of sensitivity in this cross-sectional study. Statistical significance was assessed at the 5% threshold level (pĀ <Ā 0.05). Across head-to-head assessments, the frequency of producing the strongest ACS, largest AES, andĀ statistically significant results determined the best overall construct validity. RESULTS: Overall, 304 patients consented to the study. In relation to statistically significant results, the SF-6D most frequently exhibited the strongest ACS and largest AES against the clinician-reported measure scores (ACS range 0.084-0.436; AES range 0.043-0.746), and the SQLS Motivation subscale most frequently exhibited the weakest/smallest values (ACS range 0.009-0.157; AES range 0.002-0.397), although these results were mixed according to the clinician-reported measure used for comparative analysis (ACS range 0.009-0.529; AES range 0.002-0.934). CONCLUSION: The SF-6D indicated the best (mostly moderate) construct validity but still missed the negative symptoms of the condition. Although further evidence is required to confirm or refute these exploratory results, compared with the EQ-5D, the SF-6D can be self-reported to better capture generic health-related quality-of-life aspects of schizophrenia for the purpose of economic evaluation. The lack of construct validity for SQLS Motivation and Symptoms subscales were hypothesized post-hoc to be representative of the complementary information elicited by the subscales not captured by the clinician-reported measures. Therefore, the SQLS can be self-reported to capture complementary (i.e., additional) information relative to clinician-reported measures
- ā¦