Vascular injuries after minor blunt upper extremity trauma: pitfalls in the recognition and diagnosis of potential "near miss" injuries

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Low energy trauma to the upper extremity is rarely associated with a significant vascular injury. Due to the low incidence, a high level of suspicion combined with appropriate diagnostic algorithms are mandatory for early recognition and timely management of these potentially detrimental injuries.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Review of the pertinent literature, supported by the presentation of two representative "near miss" case examples.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>A major diagnostic pitfall is represented by the insidious presentation of significant upper extremity arterial injuries with intact pulses and normal capillary refill distal to the injury site, due to collateral perfusion. Thus, severe vascular injuries may easily be missed or neglected at the upper extremity, leading to a long-term adverse outcome with the potential need for a surgical amputation.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The present review article provides an outline of the diagnostic challenges related to these rare vascular injuries and emphasizes the necessity for a high level of suspicion, even in the absence of a significant penetrating or high-velocity trauma mechanism.</p

The Prevalence and Clinical Implications of Comorbid Back Pain in Shoulder Instability: A Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) Shoulder Instability Cohort Study.

Background:Understanding predictors of pain is critical, as recent literature shows that comorbid back pain is an independent risk factor for worse functional and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) as well as increased opioid dependence after total joint arthroplasty. Purpose/Hypothesis:The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether comorbid back pain would be predictive of pain or self-reported instability symptoms at the time of stabilization surgery. We hypothesized that comorbid back pain will correlate with increased pain at the time of surgery as well as with worse scores on shoulder-related PRO measures. Study Design:Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods:As part of the Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) Shoulder Instability cohort, patients consented to participate in pre- and intraoperative data collection. Demographic characteristics, injury history, preoperative PRO scores, and radiologic and intraoperative findings were recorded for patients undergoing surgical shoulder stabilization. Patients were also asked, whether they had any back pain. Results:The study cohort consisted of 1001 patients (81% male; mean age, 24.1 years). Patients with comorbid back pain (158 patients; 15.8%) were significantly older (28.1 vs 23.4 years; P &lt; .001) and were more likely to be female (25.3% vs 17.4%; P = .02) but did not differ in terms of either preoperative imaging or intraoperative findings. Patients with self-reported back pain had significantly worse preoperative pain and shoulder-related PRO scores (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index) (P &lt; .001), more frequent depression (22.2% vs 8.3%; P &lt; .001), poorer mental health status (worse scores for the RAND 36-Item Health Survey Mental Component Score, Iowa Quick Screen, and Personality Assessment Screener) (P &lt; .01), and worse preoperative expectations (P &lt; .01). Conclusion:Despite having similar physical findings, patients with comorbid back pain had more severe preoperative pain and self-reported symptoms of instability as well as more frequent depression and lower mental health scores. The combination of disproportionate shoulder pain, comorbid back pain and mental health conditions, and inferior preoperative expectations may affect not only the patient's preoperative state but also postoperative pain control and/or postoperative outcomes

Morel-Lavallée Lesion of the Knee in a Recreational Frisbee Player

Traumatic swelling/effusion in the knee region is a relatively common presenting complaint among athletes and nonathletes. Due to its broad differential diagnosis, a comprehensive evaluation beginning with history and physical examination are recommended. Knee joint effusion can be differentiated from other types of swelling by careful physical examination. Imaging, including plain radiography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), is preferred modality. Aspiration of a local fluctuating mass may help with the diagnosis and management of some of these conditions. We present a case of a 26-year-old gentleman with superomedial Morel-Lavallée lesion (MLL) of the knee with history of a fall during a Frisbee game. His MLL was successfully treated with therapeutic aspiration and compression wrap without further sequelae. MLL is a rare condition consisting of a closed degloving injury caused by pressure and shear stress between the subcutaneous tissue and the superficial fascia or bone. Most commonly, MLL is found over the greater trochanter and sacrum but in rare cases can occur in other regions of the body. In most cases, concurrent severe injury mechanisms and concomitant fractures are present. MLL due to sports injuries are very rare. Therapeutic strategies may vary from compression wraps and aspiration to surgical evacuation

The “Sublabral Window” in Arthroscopic Posterior Shoulder Instability Surgery: Description of a Technique for Safe Posterior Glenoid Preparation

Arthroscopic posterior labral repairs for posterior shoulder instability can be challenging. Preparation of the capsulolabral tissue and glenoid bony surface is critical. Iatrogenic injury to the articular cartilage and unwarranted truncation of the capsulolabral tissue are concerns during preparation. As a result, several techniques have been described to potentially avoid these complications. We describe an additional technique for improving access and preparing the capsulolabral tissue and glenoid surface through a “sublabral window.” This technique approaches the posterior labrum and glenoid through an already established posterior portal and mitigates iatrogenic injury to the labrum and articular cartilage. The technique is rather simple and easily adaptable

Outcomes of meniscal repair: minimum of 2-year follow-up.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the success rate of meniscal repair achieved in our sports medicine practice, particularly with interest in characterizing the outcomes observed with the newer all-inside repair devices. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective chart review with telephone follow-up. METHODS: 157 patients that had undergone a meniscal repair procedure between 1996 and 2001 were identified. Twenty-four of these patients were lost to follow-up. Thus, the study group consisted of 133 patients providing a follow-up rate of 85%. All patients included had a minimum of two years of follow up. Failure was defined as the need for meniscectomy in the area of the meniscus that was initially repaired. The time interval from injury to surgery was divided into less than six weeks (acute) and greater than six weeks (chronic). The etiology of the meniscal tear was broken down into three categories; sports related trauma, non-sports trauma, and atraumatic. The repair techniques used in these patients included outside-in sutures, inside-out sutures, darts, arrows, meniscal screws, T-fix, FasT-fix, and the RapidLoc. RESULTS: The failure rate was 36%. No association was found between failure and the length of preoperative symptoms, rim width, etiology, concomitant meniscectomy, chondroplasty or anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. There was a higher rate of failure of tears in the medial versus lateral meniscus (20.3% vs. 44.8%). No statistical comparisons could be made between devices due to small sample sizes. CONCLUSIONS: The all-inside meniscal repair devices have simplified the meniscal repair procedure. This may have lead to a broadening of the indications for repair CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The newer generation meniscal repair devices, while simplifying the procedure, do not appear to lead to an increased clinical success rate

Latissimus Dorsi Tendon Repair

Background: Latissimus dorsi tendon ruptures are rare injuries that can occur in overhead or throwing motions and are almost always sports related. Indications: Latissimus dorsi tendon ruptures are largely treated nonoperatively, although surgical repair is indicated for the young active patient looking to return to a high level of sport and for those with complete avulsion injuries or mid-substance tendon tears. Technique Description: Depending on the degree of tendon retraction, anteroinferior or posteroinferior axillary incision is made. After the tendon is mobilized, sutures are placed in a Krackow fashion through the bulk of the tendon, and the tendon footprint is prepared by gently decorticating the surface of the humerus, just anterior and inferior to the teres major insertion point. Two Arthrex Pec Buttons are then loaded into the superior and inferior limbs of the suture tape and 2 unicortical holes are drilled into the footprint of the insertion site. The superior button is placed first and then tensioned to allow the latissimus dorsi to be pulled to the bone. Next, the second button is placed, though this is not tensioned until later at the time of the biceps tenodesis. Finally, the procedure is visualized and well inspected to ensure appropriate location of the tendon and securing hardware. Results: After an appropriate rehabilitation protocol is followed for up to 6 months postoperatively, acute repair of a ruptured latissimus dorsi tendon allows for near to complete restoration of patient functionality and strength, with return to full activity possible within 6 to 8 months. Conclusion: Surgical repair of a ruptured latissimus dorsi tendon is effective in restoring upper extremity strength and functionality and is associated with high patient satisfaction. The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication

Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation

Background: Articular cartilage lesions are a significant cause of morbidity and impaired knee function, and attempts to surgically repair damaged cartilage have failed to reliably reproduce native cartilage. Thus, osteochondral allograft transplantation is an effective one-step procedure to repair large cartilage defects. Indications: Osteochondral allograft transplantation is indicated for young active patients with large focal defects, those with a history of previous cartilage repair, and those with cartilage-related degenerative disorders such as osteonecrosis, osteochondritis dissecans, and/or post-traumatic osteochondral defects. Technique Description: In short, after the focal chondral defect is identified, a socket is created with specific dimensions in depth and diameter. The donor cartilage is then secured in a graft station, and a sizing guide is placed through a bushing to confirm the allograft harvest location. Using stabilization from the graft station arm, a coring reamer is then advanced through the donor cartilage, and a saw is used to allow for easy removal of the graft from the donor condyle. The plug is then fashioned to fit the exact dimensions of the socket created earlier in the procedure. A cut on the donor plug is made to fashion the plug to the appropriate depth. A rongeur is used to make the plug more bullet shaped at the end to allow the plug to enter the socket more easily. Small holes are then drilled into the base of the socket to help promote incorporation of the plug into the socket during the healing process. After the socket is irrigated, the plug is then placed into the socket, and a tamp is used to gently tap the cartilage until it is flush with the surrounding surface. Results: After an appropriate rehabilitation protocol is followed for up to 10 months postoperatively, osteochondral allograft transplantation allows for near-to-complete restoration of patient functionality and strength, with return to full activity possible within 1 year. Conclusion: Acute repair of large focal chondral defects is effective in restoring knee strength and functionality and is associated with high patient satisfaction. The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication