Observer perceptions of the justifiability of the actions of nations in conflict: The relative importance of conveying national vulnerability versus strength

Because the underdog in a conflict typically gains the support of observers, nations will often adopt a narrative that persuades both their domestic following and international allies that they are the true victim in the conflict. Three survey studies were conducted to assess the perceptions of citizens of a third-party observer nation (Canada) in relation to two nations in conflict that differ in their historical persecution, namely the U.S. and Israel. Perceptions of the vulnerability of their safety and survival, and their strength to protect themselves against their opponents were hypothesized to mediate differences in the perceived justification for each nation's conflict actions. Study 1 (N = 91) supported this mediational model, with the U.S. seen as less vulnerable and more powerful than Israel, and perceptions of vulnerability accounting for differences in the justifiability of their respective conflict actions. Study 2 (N = 315) further demonstrated a moderating effect of Canadians' shared identity with the nations

Having a lot of a good thing: multiple important group memberships as a source of self-esteem.

Copyright: © 2015 Jetten et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are creditedMembership in important social groups can promote a positive identity. We propose and test an identity resource model in which personal self-esteem is boosted by membership in additional important social groups. Belonging to multiple important group memberships predicts personal self-esteem in children (Study 1a), older adults (Study 1b), and former residents of a homeless shelter (Study 1c). Study 2 shows that the effects of multiple important group memberships on personal self-esteem are not reducible to number of interpersonal ties. Studies 3a and 3b provide longitudinal evidence that multiple important group memberships predict personal self-esteem over time. Studies 4 and 5 show that collective self-esteem mediates this effect, suggesting that membership in multiple important groups boosts personal self-esteem because people take pride in, and derive meaning from, important group memberships. Discussion focuses on when and why important group memberships act as a social resource that fuels personal self-esteem.This study was supported by 1. Australian Research Council Future Fellowship (FT110100238) awarded to Jolanda Jetten (see http://www.arc.gov.au) 2. Australian Research Council Linkage Grant (LP110200437) to Jolanda Jetten and Genevieve Dingle (see http://www.arc.gov.au) 3. support from the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research Social Interactions, Identity and Well-Being Program to Nyla Branscombe, S. Alexander Haslam, and Catherine Haslam (see http://www.cifar.ca)

The intersection of self-evaluation maintenance and social identity theories: Intragroup judgment in interpersonal and intergroup contexts

Abstract: In two studies, the authors explore the integration of the self-evaluation maintenance (SEM) model and social identity theory (SIT) by focusing on each perspective's predictions for the evaluation of members of one's ingroup. SEM's predictions apply to personal identity concerns, whereas SIT's predictions are applicable to concerns for a group identity. In Study 1, participants evaluated an ingroup member who highly outperformed them. High-and low-identified participants did not differ in the irratings of the target in an interpersonal context but high identifiers did like the target more than lows in an intergroup context. In Study 2, highly identified participants preferred a poorly performing target in an interpersonal context, but in an intergroup context, they preferred the one who outperformed them. Results are discussed in terms of the theoretical overlap between SEM and SIT and how self-categorization theory can help integrate interpersonal and intergroup perspectives on self-evaluation. Article: In the spirit of Mackie and Smith's (1998) call for theoretical integration of interpersonal and intergroup phenomena, we present two studies that explore the intersection of SEM and SIT. We focus on the SEM concerns that arise when an ingroup member outperforms the self. An outperforming ingroup member threatens one's self-evaluation as an individual but it boosts the evaluation of one's ingroup. We propose that two factors determine how people evaluate the ingroup member in this situation: how the self is categorized (at the interpersonal or group level) and the level of identification with that group when the self is categorized as a group member. Our most basic argument is that when the context is interpersonal, SEM predictions apply, whereas SIT predictions are applicable to intergroup contexts. SELF-EVALUATION IN AN INTERPERSONAL CONTEXT Tesser's (1988) SEM model -assumes that (1) persons behave in a manner that will maintain or increase selfevaluation and (2) one's relations with others will have a substantial impact on self-evaluation‖ (pp. 181-182). Exactly how a relationship with another person affects self-evaluation depends on three interactive factors: the self-relevance of the comparison dimension, the other's performance on that dimension relative to one's own