Rationale and design of the RIACT–study: a multi-center placebo controlled double blind study to test the efficacy of RItuximab in Acute Cellular tubulointerstitial rejection with B-cell infiltrates in renal Transplant patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney allograft rejection is a major cause for declining graft function and has a negative impact on the long-term graft survival. The majority (90%) of acute rejections are T-cell mediated and, therefore, the anti-rejection therapy targets T-cell-mediated mechanisms of the rejection process. However, there is increasing evidence that intragraft B-cells are also important in the T-cell-mediated rejections. First, a significant proportion of patients with acute T-cell-mediated rejection have B-cells present in the infiltrates. Second, the outcome of these patients is inferior, which has been related to an inferior response to the conventional anti-rejection therapy. Third, treatment of these patients with an anti-CD20 antibody (rituximab) improves the allograft outcome as reported in single case observations and in one small study. Despite the promise of these observations, solid evidence is required before incorporating this treatment option into a general treatment recommendation. METHODS/DESIGN: The RIACT study is designed as a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group multicenter Phase III study. The study examines whether rituximab, in addition to the standard treatment with steroid-boli, leads to an improved one-year kidney allograft function, compared to the standard treatment alone in patients with acute T-cell mediated tubulointerstitial rejection and significant B-cell infiltrates in their biopsies. A total of 180 patients will be recruited. DISCUSSION: It is important to clarify the relevance of anti-B cell targeting in T-cell mediated rejection and answer the question whether this novel concept should be incorporated in the conventional anti-rejection therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trials gov. number: NCT0111766

Minimal change nephrotic syndrome in an 82 year old patient following a tetanus-diphteria-poliomyelitis-vaccination

Abstract Background The most common cause of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome in children and younger adults is the minimal change nephrotic syndrome (MCNS). In the elderly MCNS is relatively uncommon. Over the last decade some reports suggest a rare but possible association with the administration of various vaccines. Case presentation A 82-year old Caucasian female presented with pronounced nephrotic syndrome (proteinuria of 7.1 g/d, hypoproteinemia of 47 g/l). About six weeks prior to admission, she had received a combination vaccination for tetanus, diphtheria and poliomyelitis as a booster-vaccination from her general practitioner. The renal biopsy revealed typical minimal change lesions. She responded well to the initiated steroid treatment. As through physical examination as well as extensive laboratory and imaging studies did neither find any evidence for malignancies nor infections we suggest that the minimal change nephrotic syndrome in this patient might be related to the activation of the immune system triggered by the vaccination. Conclusion Our case as well as previous anecdotal reports suggests that vaccination and the resulting stimulations of the immune system might cause MCNS and other severe immune-reactions. Increased awareness in that regard might help to expand the database of those cases.</p

Glomerular macrophage index (GMI) in kidney transplant biopsies is associated with graft outcome

Background: Macrophages in renal transplants have been shown to participate in antibody-mediated rejection and are associated with impaired renal function. We calculated the glomerular macrophage index (GMI) in a large transplant biopsy cohort, studied its quantity in different diagnostic groups, to clarify its possible impact on graft survival. Methods: GMI, defined as the mean number of macrophages in 10 glomeruli, was prospectively quantified in 1440 renal transplant biopsies over a 10-year period. The main histopathological diagnoses were grouped into eight disease entities, and GMI was compared to normal transplant biopsies as the reference group. The impact of GMI on graft survival was analyzed. Results: GMI was highest in chronic (mean 9.4) and active (9.7) antibody mediated rejections (ABMR), mixed rejections (7.6), and recurrent or de novo glomerulonephritis (7.5) and differed significantly from normal transplants (1.3) in almost all diagnostic groups. Hazard ratios for graft loss were significantly increased for all biopsies with GMI ≥1.9 compared to GMI &lt;.5 (reference group) in an adjusted Cox regression model and increased with higher GMI levels. Biopsies with GMI ≥ 4.6 had &lt; 60% 10-year graft-survival, compared to &gt; 80% with GMI ≤ 1.8. Conclusion: GMI levels were predictive of graft loss independent of histological diagnoses and may guide clinicians to decide follow-up and therapy

Fetuin, matrix-Gla protein and osteopontin in calcification of renal allografts.

BACKGROUND: Calcification of renal allografts is common in the first year after transplantation and is related to hyperparathyroidism. It is associated with an impaired long-term function of the graft (Am J Transplant 5∶1934-41, 2005). Aim of this study is to examine the role of the anti-calcifying/calcifying factors in the pathophysiology of renal allograft calcification. METHODS: We analyzed protocol allograft biopsies, blood and urine samples of 31 patients with and 27 patients without allograft calcification taken at 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months after transplantation. Patient demographical data, cold ischemia time, initial graft function and donor characteristics were comparable between the two groups. Biopsies were stained for osteopontin, fetuin, and matrix-gla-protein. Serum and urine electrolytes, matrix-gla-protein, fetuin, Vitamin D and intact parathyroid hormone in serum and osteopontin (OPN) in urine were examined. RESULTS: Serum levels of fetuin and matrix-Gla protein as well as urinary levels of OPN showed specific time dependent changes (6 weeks vs. 3 months vs. 6 months; all p<0.0001). In patients with calcifications, urinary levels of OPN were decreased by 55% at 6 weeks and increased thereafter, showing 54% higher levels at 6 months compared to patients without calcification (6 weeks: p<0.01, 6 months: p<0.05). Local protein expression of fetuin-A, matrix-Gla protein and OPN in the graft was specifically increased around calcified plaques, without differences in the mRNA tissue expression. CONCLUSION: Anticalcifying factors show significant changes in the early phase after renal transplantation, which may be important for the prevention of allograft calcification. The differences in OPN indicate an involvement of this factor in the regulation of calcification

Demographics and transplant data of patients with and without (controls) calcification.

<p>Continuous data are given as mean±SD unless otherwise stated;</p>*<p>p = 0.011.</p

Representative images of Fetuin A (A), MGP (B) and OPN (C) expression are shown (red circle).

<p>The expression of the antigens is specifically localized in the vicinity of calcified plaques in patients with calcification. A representative control image is shown for Osteopontin (D). Original magnification: (Fetuin a and MGP x40; OPN x40 and x60).</p

Levels of parathyroid hormone (A), serum calcium (B) and vitamin D (C) are shown in NC patients and controls at the indicated time points.

<p>Patients with calcification are depicted in red. Data are shown as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM).</p

Urinary concentrations of OPN are shown in NC patients and control transplant patients without signs of calcification at the indicated time points.

<p>Patients with calcification are depicted in red.</p

Serum concentrations of Fetuin A (A) as well as MGP (B) are shown in NC patients (n = 31) in comparison to control transplant patients without signs of calcification (n = 27) at the indicated time points.

<p>Patients with calcification are depicted in red.</p

Urinary mineral ions in patients and controls at biopsy time points.

<p>Urinary mineral ions in patients and controls at biopsy time points.</p