Entre les experts et les blogs, où se situe la démocratie ?

Brézin Édouard. Entre les experts et les blogs, où se situe la démocratie ?. In: Raison présente, n°176, 4e trimestre 2010. Culture, savoirs et compétences. pp. 45-52

Introduction. Croyance et connaissance

Brézin Édouard. Introduction. Croyance et connaissance. In: Raison présente, n°188, 4e trimestre 2013. Croyance et connaissance. pp. 7-9

Conclusion

Brézin Édouard. Conclusion. In: Raison présente, n°168, 4e trimestre 2008. Science et laïcité. pp. 107-110

Introduction

Fussman Gérard, Brézin Édouard. Introduction. In: Raison présente, n°168, 4e trimestre 2008. Science et laïcité. pp. 5-9

L'accident majeur de Fukushima

« Le 11 mars 2011, le district Nord-Est du Japon a été frappé par un tremblement de terre massif suivi d’un tsunami majeur et d’une série d’accidents à la centrale nucléaire de Fukushima avec fuites d’éléments radioactifs ». Tel est le message que le professeur Kanazawa, président du Science Council of Japan (SCJ) adressa quelques jours après la catastrophe aux présidents des académies des sciences étrangère

Discussion suivant l'exposé de JF Sirinelli

Sirinelli Jean-François, Joliot Pierre, Hayat Pierre, Brézin Édouard. Discussion suivant l'exposé de JF Sirinelli. In: Raison présente, n°176, 4e trimestre 2010. Culture, savoirs et compétences. pp. 61-62

The major accident at Fukushima

“On March 11, 2011, the North-East of Japan was struck by a huge earthquake followed by a major tsunami and a series of accidents that took place at the nuclear power site at Fukushima, with emissions of radioactive elements”. This was the message addressed by Prof. Kanazawa, President of the Science Council of Japan (SCJ), only a few days after the catastrophe, to his colleagues Presidents of the Science Academies, adding that he nourished the hope the “the academies would continue in the future to help with the necessary rehabilitation work”. The idea arose immediately to set up an ad hoc academic Working Party, with the assigned mission to analyse the events that had taken place in Japan, to make a status report regarding seismic and nuclear risks both in metropolitan France and in overseas territories and to draw conclusions and make recommendations as deemed appropriate to the situation. The academic Working Party comprised three separate sub-groups, each dealing with one of the three aspects – seismic, nuclear and medical – of the drama as it unfolded. For each of these components, objects of the three parts of this report, the analysis of observed events in Fukushima was supplemented by a reflection o the strengths and weaknesses of these areas in France, in order to formulate the necessary recommendations and to answer scientific and societal question public arises. Although uncertainties remain and that new information still come each month to enrich the record, the enclosed reports seemed complete enough to be published in the state, after the anniversary of this tragedy that will long continue to challenge us