Reply to comment by B. Cecconi on "Spectral features of SKR observed by Cassini/RPWS: Frequency bandwidth, flux density and polarization"

International audienceThe main purpose of the paper by Galopeau et al.[2007] was to classify the spectral features of the Saturniankilometric radiation (SKR) starting from three physicalobserved parameters: the frequency bandwidth, the fluxdensity, and the pol arization. We show in the presentresponse that an unsupervised application of arbitrary auto-matic criteria during the data processing (such as a signal-to-noise ratio greater than 23 dB) can totally judge a weaknatural emission as a background noise. As a consequence,such a situation may lead to consideration of only the datapresenting a degree of circular polarization close to 100%and neglect a huge part of the data. Galopeau et al. [2007]considered a phenomenological aspect and gave an estima-tion of the Stokes parameters. This approach leads to firstrecognizing spectral components (flux density and band-width) in the frequency range from 3.5 kHz to 1200 kHz,and then deriving the Stokes parameters for each compo-nent. The Cassini/RPWS instrument provides long-lastingcoverage of radio emissions at Saturn with unprecedentedinstrumental capabilities

Remote sensing of the Io torus plasma ribbon using natural radio occultation of the Jovian radio emissions

International audienceWe study the Jovian hectometric (HOM) emissions recorded by the RPWS (Radio and Plasma Wave Science) experiment onboard the Cassini spacecraft during its Jupiter flyby. We analyze the attenuation band associated with the intensity extinction of HOM radiation. This phenomenon is interpreted as a refraction effect of the Jovian hectometric emission inside the Io plasma torus. This attenuation band was regularly observed during periods of more than 5 months, from the beginning of October 2000 to the end of March 2001. We estimate for this period the variation of the electron density versus the central meridian longitude (CML). We find a clear local time dependence. Hence the electron density was not higher than 5.0 × 104 cm−3 during 2 months, when the spacecraft approached the planet on the dayside. In the late afternoon and evening sectors, the electron density increases to 1.5 × 105 cm−3 and reach a higher value at some specific occasions. Additionally, we show that ultraviolet and hectometric wavelength observations have common features related to the morphology of the Io plasma torus. The maxima of enhancements/attenuations of UV/HOM observations occur close to the longitudes of the tip of the magnetic dipole in the southern hemisphere (20° CML) and in the northern hemisphere (200° CML), respectively. This is a significant indication about the importance of the Jovian magnetic field as a physical parameter in the coupling process between Jupiter and the Io satellite

Wavelet analysis applied on temporal data sets in order to reveal possible pre-seismic radio anomalies and comparison with the trend of the raw data

Since 2009, several radio receivers have been installed throughout Europe in order to realize the INFREP European radio network for studying the VLF (10-50 kHz) and LF (150-300 kHz) radio precursors of earthquakes. Precursors can be related to “anomalies” in the night-time behavior of VLF signals. A suitable method of analysis is the use of the Wavelet spectra. Using the “Morlet function”, the Wavelet transform of a time signal is a complex series that can be usefully represented by its square amplitude, i.e. considering the so-called Wavelet power spectrum. The power spectrum is a 2D diagram that, once properly normalized with respect to the power of the white noise, gives information on the strength and precise time of occurrence of the various Fourier components, which are present in the original time series. The main difference between the Wavelet power spectra and the Fourier power spectra for the time series is that the former identifies the frequency content along the operational time, which cannot be done with the latter. Anomalies are identified as regions of the Wavelet spectrogram characterized by a sudden increase in the power strength. On January 30, 2020 an earthquake with Mw= 6.0 occurred in Dodecanese Islands. The results of the Wavelet analysis carried out on data collected some INFREP receivers is compared with the trends of the raw data. The time series from January 24, 2020 till January 31, 2000 was analyzed. The Wavelet spectrogram shows a peak corresponding to a period of 1 day on the days before January 30. This anomaly was found for signals transmitted at the frequencies 19,58 kHz, 20, 27 kHz, 23,40 kHz with an energy in the peak increasing from 19,58 kHz to 23,40 kHz. In particular, the signal at the frequency 19,58 kHz, shows a peak on January 29, while the frequencies 20,27 kHz and 23,40 kHz are characterized by a peak starting on January 28 and continuing to January 29. The results presented in this work shows the perspective use of the Wavelet spectrum analysis as an operational tool for the detection of anomalies in VLF and LF signal potentially related to EQ precursors

Analysis of pre-seismic ionospheric disturbances prior to 2020 2 Croatian earthquakes

Abstract: We study the sub-ionospheric VLF transmitter signals recorded by the Austrian Graz station in the year 2020. Those radio signals are known to propagate in the Earth-ionosphere waveguide between the ground and lower ionosphere. The Austrian Graz facility (geographic coordinates: 15.46◦E, 47.03◦N) can receive such sub-ionospheric transmitter signals, particularly those propagating above earthquake (EQ) regions in the southern part of Europe. We consider in this work the transmitter amplitude variations recorded a few weeks before the occurrence of two EQs in Croatia at a distance less than 200 km from Graz VLF facility. The selected EQs happened on 22 March 2020 and 29 December 2020, with magnitudes of Mw5.4 and Mw6.4, respectively, epicenters localized close to Zagreb (16.02◦E, 45.87◦N; 16.21◦E, 45.42◦N), and with focuses of depth smaller than 10 km. In our study we emphasize the anomaly fluctuations before/after the sunrise times, sunset times, and the cross-correlation of transmitter signals. We attempt to evaluate and to estimate the latitudinal and the longitudinal expansions of the ionospheric disturbances related to the seismic preparation areas

Study of VLF/LF wave propagations above seismic areas

Abstract: We report on radio transmitter signals recorded in Europe by INFREP network which is mainly devoted to search for earthquakes electromagnetic precursors (Biagi et al., 2011). We consider in this analysis the detection of transmitter signals recorded by INFREP receivers located in different regions of Europe, i.e. Romania, Italy, Greece and Austria. The aim is the investigation of the electromagnetic environment above earthquakes regions. We selected seismic events which occurred in the year 2016 and characterized by a moment magnitude (Mw) above 5.0 and a depth of less than 50 km. A common method is applied to all events and which involves the analysis of the VLF/LF signal detection taking into consideration the following parameters: (a) the distance transmitters-receivers, (b) the signal to noise ratio during the diurnal and night observations, (c) the daily and night averaged amplitude and (d) the sunset and sunrise termination times. This leads us to specify the key factors which can be considered as criteria to distinguish and to identify earthquakes precursors. We discuss in this contribution the radio wave propagation in the D- and E-layers and their impacts on the VLF/LF amplitude signal. We show that the 'seismic anomaly' requests a more precise analysis of the 'quiet' and 'disturbed' ionospheric conditions and their corresponding spectral traces on the VLF/LF transmitter signals

Mesures de la polarisation des emissions radio decametriques de Jupiter

SIGLEAvailable from INIST (FR), Document Supply Service, under shelf-number : TD 78887 / INIST-CNRS - Institut de l'Information Scientifique et TechniqueFRFranc

Beaming cone of the Jovian decameter emission derived from different magnetic field models

International audienceFive different Jupiter"s magnetic field models (O6, VIP4, VIT4, VIPAL and JRM09) are used to investigate the angular distribution of the Jovian decameter radiation occurrence probability, relatively to the local magnetic field B and its gradient ∇B in the source region. The most recent model JRM09, proposed by Connerney et al. [Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 2590-2596, 2018], and derived from Juno"s first nine orbits observations, confirms the results obtained several years ago using older models (O6, VIP4, VIT4 and VIPAL): the radio emission is beamed in a hollow cone presenting a flattening in a specific direction. In this study, the same assumptions were made as in the previous ones: the Jovian decameter radiation is supposed to be produced by the cyclotron maser instability (CMI) in a plasma where B and ∇B are not parallel. The main result of our study is that the emission cone does not have any axial symmetry and then presents a flattening in a privileged direction. This flattening appears to be more important for the northern emission (34.8%) than for the southern emission (12.5%) probably due to the fact that the angle between the directions of B and ∇B is greater in the North (~10°) than in the South (~4°)

Features of emission cone of Jovian decameter radiation and observation of Jupiter's magnetic field by JUNO

International audienceA new magnetic field model for Jupiter, based on Juno's first nine orbits observations, JRM09, was recently proposed by Connerney et al. [Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 2590-2596, 2018]. We use this model to investigate the angular distribution of the Jovian decameter radiation occurrence probability, relatively to the local magnetic field B and its gradient ∇B in the source region, and we compare the results to those obtained several years ago using older models (O6, VIP4, VIT4 and VIPAL). The JRM09 model confirms the former results: the radio emission is beamed in a hollow cone presenting a flattening in a specific direction. The same assumptions were made as in the previous studies: the Jovian decameter radiation is supposed to be produced by the cyclotron maser instability (CMI) in a plasma where B and ∇B are not parallel. As a consequence, the emission cone does not have any axial symmetry and then presents a flattening in a privileged direction. This flattening appears to be more important for the northern emission (34.8%) than for the southern emission (12.5%) probably due to the fact that the angle between the directions of B and ∇B is greater in the North (∼ 10∘) than in the South (∼ 4∘)

Emission cone of Jovian decameter radiation derived from Jupiter's magnetic field observed by JUNO

International audienceWe use Jupiter's new magnetic field model JRM09 to investigate the angular distribution of the Jovian decameter radiation occurrence probability, relatively to the local magnetic field and the gradient of its modulus in the source region

Relevance of the magnetic field model for studying the beaming cone of the Jovian decameter emission

International audienceWe use five different Jupiter's magnetic field models (O6, VIP4, VIT4, VIPAL and JRM09) to investigate the angular distribution of the Jovian decameter radiation occurrence probability, relatively to the local magnetic field B and its gradient ∇B in the source region. The most recent model JRM09, proposed by Connerney et al. [Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 2590-2596, 2018], was derived from Juno's first nine orbits observations. The JRM09 model confirms the results obtained several years ago using older models (O6, VIP4, VIT4 and VIPAL): the radio emission is beamed in a hollow cone presenting a flattening in a specific direction. The same assumptions were made as in the previous studies: the Jovian decameter radiation is supposed to be produced by the cyclotron maser instability (CMI) in a plasma where B and ∇B are not parallel. As a consequence, the emission cone does not have any axial symmetry and then presents a flattening in a privileged direction. This flattening appears to be more important for the northern emission (34.8%) than for the southern emission (12.5%) probably due to the fact that the angle between the directions of B and ∇B is greater in the North (~10°) than in the South (~4°)